IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea16/235881.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does self regulation work? The case of television food advertisement to children in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Landwehr, Stefanie C.
  • Hartmann, Monika

Abstract

Television advertisement targeting children and promoting food products high in sugar, saturated fat or sodium is considered to enhance the development of childhood overweight and obesity. Thus, reducing children’s exposure to advertisement of energy-dense, nutrient-poor (EDNP) products is considered as one option to improve children’s health. In 2007, globally leading food and beverage companies launched the EU Pledge, a self-regulation initiative in which signatory corporations agreed to restrict television and internet advertising of EDNP products not in line with specific nutritional criteria to media audiences of at least 35 % children under the age of 12 at European level. While initially each participating corporation defined their own nutritional criteria, in 2012 companies agreed on a common nutrient profiling system which has to be adopted by the end of 2014. The overall objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the EU Pledge in reducing children’s exposure television advertising of EDNP food and drink products. In October 2011, 2012 and 2014, television program of ten German television networks was recorded each on one weekend day and one week day. In total, 892 hours of television program were taped. Data was analyzed using content analysis. The sample contains 127.6 hours of advertising with a total of 1,069 food commercials addressing children. More than half of all food advertisements designed in a child-appealing way originates from Pledge-signatory companies (57.4 %). The share of products from Pledge-participating companies matching the common criteria of the EU Pledge increased from 37.5 % in 2011 to 75.0 % in 2014. At the same time, the share of non-participating companies declined (2011: 80.0 %; 2014: 25.0 %). However, compared to the criteria of the Ofcom score (compliance Pledge-members 2011: 12.5 %; 2014: 25.0) criteria of the EU Pledge are considerable less strict. The results indicate that despite the adoption of harmonized criteria, the overall nutritional value of food products advertised to children on television has not improved as EDNP products continue dominating food commercials to children.

Suggested Citation

  • Landwehr, Stefanie C. & Hartmann, Monika, 2016. "Does self regulation work? The case of television food advertisement to children in Germany," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235881, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235881
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.235881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235881/files/Does%20self-regulation%20work_AAEA%202016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.235881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:eurcho:v:8:y:2009:i:3:p:22-28 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Carter, Owen B.J. & Patterson, Lisa J. & Donovan, Robert J. & Ewing, Michael T. & Roberts, Clare M., 2011. "Children's understanding of the selling versus persuasive intent of junk food advertising: Implications for regulation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 962-968, March.
    3. Thomas Lehnert & Pawel Streltchenia & Alexander Konnopka & Steffi Riedel-Heller & Hans-Helmut König, 2015. "Health burden and costs of obesity and overweight in Germany: an update," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(9), pages 957-967, December.
    4. Harrison, K. & Marske, A.L., 2005. "Nutritional content of foods advertised during the television programs children watch most," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(9), pages 1568-1574.
    5. Paul M. Connell & Merrie Brucks & Jesper H. Nielsen, 2014. "How Childhood Advertising Exposure Can Create Biased Product Evaluations That Persist into Adulthood," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 119-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Landwehr, Stefanie C. & Hartmann, Monika, 2020. "Industry self-regulation of food advertisement to children: Compliance versus effectiveness of the EU Pledge," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Petra Landovská & Martina Karbanová, 2023. "Social costs of obesity in the Czech Republic," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(8), pages 1321-1341, November.
    3. Michaela Jackson & Paul Harrison & Boyd Swinburn & Mark Lawrence, 2015. "Marketing ethics in context: the promotion of unhealthy foods and beverages to children," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 17, pages 354-386, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Yura Kim & Taeyeon Kim & Hye-Jeong Nam, 2021. "Marketing Investments and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Pavleen Kaur, 2011. "Need for Parental Control and Mediation in Food Advertising to Children: A Review of Previous Research," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 3(3), pages 171-177.
    6. Cozac, Marina & Mende, Martin & Scott, Maura L., 2023. "Consumer preferences for fuel snacks at the intersection of caregiving stress and gender," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Mehta, Ritu & Bharadwaj, Apoorva, 2021. "Food advertising targeting children in India: Analysis and implications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Galih Putri Wulandari & Susi Ari Kristina, 2018. "Direct and Indirect Cost of Obesity: A Systematic Review," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 122-122, September.
    9. repec:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2023:i:5:p:926-939. is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Gloria Jiménez-Marín & Rodrigo Elías Zambrano & Araceli Galiano-Coronil & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2020. "Food and Beverage Advertising Aimed at Spanish Children Issued through Mobile Devices: A Study from a Social Marketing and Happiness Management Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Tobias Effertz & Susanne Engel & Frank Verheyen & Roland Linder, 2016. "The costs and consequences of obesity in Germany: a new approach from a prevalence and life-cycle perspective," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(9), pages 1141-1158, December.
    12. Jesse D Malkin & Drishti Baid & Reem F Alsukait & Taghred Alghaith & Mohammed Alluhidan & Hana Alabdulkarim & Abdulaziz Altowaijri & Ziyad S Almalki & Christopher H Herbst & Eric Andrew Finkelstein & , 2022. "The economic burden of overweight and obesity in Saudi Arabia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-8, March.
    13. Phoebe R. Ruggles & Jacob E. Thomas & Natalie S. Poulos & Keryn E. Pasch, 2023. "School-Level Socioeconomic Status and Nutrient Content of Outdoor Food/Beverage Advertisements," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-12, September.
    14. Minton, Elizabeth A. & Cornwell, T. Bettina & Yuan, Hong, 2021. "I know what you are thinking: How theory of mind is employed in product evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 405-422.
    15. Hogreve, Jens & Matta, Shashi & Hettich, Alexander S. & Reczek, Rebecca Walker, 2021. "How Do Social Norms Influence Parents’ Food Choices for Their Children? The Role of Social Comparison and Implicit Self-Theories," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 173-190.
    16. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:72-79 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. David Rowthorn, 2019. "Is Child Advertising Inherently Unfair?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 603-615, September.
    18. Susan Linn & Courtney L. Novosat, 2008. "Calories for Sale: Food Marketing to Children in the Twenty-First Century," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 615(1), pages 133-155, January.
    19. Roberto Cattivelli & Anna Guerrini Usubini & Gian Mauro Manzoni & Francesco Vailati Riboni & Giada Pietrabissa & Alessandro Musetti & Christian Franceschini & Giorgia Varallo & Chiara A. M. Spatola & , 2021. "ACTonFood. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Based Group Treatment Compared to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Group Treatment for Weight Loss Maintenance: An Individually Randomized Group Treatmen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Phua, Peilin & Kennedy, Rachel & Trinh, Giang & Page, Bill & Hartnett, Nicole, 2020. "Examining older consumers’ loyalty towards older brands in grocery retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    21. Fabrizio Carmignani & Grace Lordan & Kam Ki Tang, 2012. "Does Donor Assistance For Hiv Respond To Media Pressure?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(S1), pages 18-32, June.
    22. Mimi Tatlow-Golden & Daniel Parker, 2020. "The Devil Is in the Detail: Challenging the UK Government’s 2019 Impact Assessment of the Extent of Online Marketing of Unhealthy Foods to Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Health Economics and Policy; Marketing;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.