IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jcopol/v37y2014i2p205-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the What Is Beautiful Is Good Stereotype and the Influence of Moderately Attractive and Less Attractive Advertising Models on Self-Perception, Ad Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions of 8–13-Year-Old Children

Author

Listed:
  • Iris Vermeir
  • Dieneke Sompel

Abstract

This paper investigates (1) whether the physical attractiveness stereotype applies to children, (2) whether children’s self-perception is influenced by the attractiveness of an advertising model, (3) whether children’s attitudes towards an ad and buying intentions for a non-beauty-related product are influenced by the attractiveness of an advertising model, and (4) whether age affects (1), (2), and (3). Results of two experimental studies with respectively 8–9-year-old (N = 75) and 12–13 year old (N = 57) girls and boys confirm the presence of the physical attractiveness stereotype in children. The presence of a moderately attractive (vs. less attractive) model has a negative influence on general self-worth for 8–9-year-old boys, but not for girls, nor for 12–13-year-old children. Exposure to a moderately attractive (vs. less attractive) model also has a positive influence on perceived physical appearance of 8–9-year-old girls, but this effect does not occur for boys, nor for 12–13-year-olds. The studies also show that moderately attractive (vs. less attractive) models increase attitudes and buying intentions for 8–9-year-olds, but not for 12–13-year-old boys and girls. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Iris Vermeir & Dieneke Sompel, 2014. "Assessing the What Is Beautiful Is Good Stereotype and the Influence of Moderately Attractive and Less Attractive Advertising Models on Self-Perception, Ad Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions of 8–13-Y," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 205-233, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:37:y:2014:i:2:p:205-233
    DOI: 10.1007/s10603-013-9245-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10603-013-9245-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10603-013-9245-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derbaix, Christian & Pecheux, Claude, 2003. "A New Scale to Assess Children's Attitude toward TV Advertising," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 390-399, December.
    2. Moore, Elizabeth S & Lutz, Richard J, 2000. "Children, Advertising, and Product Experiences: A Multimethod Inquiry," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(1), pages 31-48, June.
    3. Richins, Marsha L, 1991. "Social Comparison and the Idealized Images of Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 71-83, June.
    4. Robertson, Thomas S & Rossiter, John R, 1974. "Children and Commercial Persuasion: An Attribution Theory Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 1(1), pages 13-20, June.
    5. John, Deborah Roedder, 1999. "Consumer Socialization of Children: A Retrospective Look at Twenty-Five Years of Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(3), pages 183-213, December.
    6. Roedder, Deborah L, 1981. "Age Differences in Children's Responses to Television Advertising: An Information-Processing Approach," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 8(2), pages 144-153, September.
    7. Brucks, Merrie & Armstrong, Gary M & Goldberg, Marvin E, 1988. "Children's Use of Cognitive Defenses against Television Advertising: A Cognitive Response Approach," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(4), pages 471-482, March.
    8. Bahn, Kenneth D, 1986. "How and When Do Brand Perceptions and Preferences First Form? A Cognitive Developmental Investigation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(3), pages 382-393, December.
    9. Capon, Noel & Kuhn, Deanna, 1980. "A Developmental Study of Consumer Information-Processing Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(3), pages 225-233, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Jesús Ruiz-Montero & Oscar Chiva-Bartoll & Antonio Baena-Extremera & David Hortigüela-Alcalá, 2020. "Gender, Physical Self-Perception and Overall Physical Fitness in Secondary School Students: A Multiple Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Reijmersdal, Eva A. & Rozendaal, Esther & Buijzen, Moniek, 2012. "Effects of Prominence, Involvement, and Persuasion Knowledge on Children's Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advergames," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 33-42.
    2. Sabrina Bruyneel & Laurens Cherchye & Sam Cosaert & Bram De Rock & Siegfried Dewitte, 2020. "Verbal Aptitude Hurts Children’s Economic Decision Making Accuracy," Working Papers ECARES 2020-22, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Williams, Janine & Ashill, Nicholas & Thirkell, Peter, 2016. "How is value perceived by children?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5875-5885.
    4. Yann Verhellen & Caroline Oates & Patrick Pelsmacker & Nathalie Dens, 2014. "Children’s Responses to Traditional Versus Hybrid Advertising Formats: The Moderating Role of Persuasion Knowledge," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 235-255, June.
    5. De Jans, Steffi & Hudders, Liselot, 2020. "Disclosure of Vlog Advertising Targeted to Children," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-19.
    6. Raghbir Singh & Pavleen Kaur, 2014. "Maternal Attitude towards TV Advertising in India," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(2), pages 160-173, May.
    7. Reifurth, Katherine R.N. & Wear, Henry T. & Heere, Bob, 2020. "Creating fans from scratch: A qualitative analysis of child consumer brand perceptions of a new sport team," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 428-442.
    8. Pavleen Kaur, 2011. "Foods Promotion to Children: Understanding the Need of Responsibility in Marketing to Children," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 2(4), pages 133-137.
    9. Abideen, Zain Ul & Salaria, Rashid M., 2009. "Effects of television advertising on children: with special reference to pakistani urban children," MPRA Paper 22321, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Apr 2010.
    10. Mehta, Ritu & Bharadwaj, Apoorva, 2021. "Food advertising targeting children in India: Analysis and implications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    11. Hogg, Margaret K. & Banister, Emma N. & Stephenson, Christopher A., 2009. "Mapping symbolic (anti-) consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 148-159, February.
    12. Clinton Gudmunson & Ivan Beutler, 2012. "Relation of Parental Caring to Conspicuous Consumption Attitudes in Adolescents," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 389-399, December.
    13. Ajay Kumar & Ruchi Sharma, 2017. "Perceived Influential Aspects of TV Advertising," Paradigm, , vol. 21(2), pages 192-210, December.
    14. van Reijmersdal, Eva A. & Rozendaal, Esther & Hudders, Liselot & Vanwesenbeeck, Ini & Cauberghe, Veroline & van Berlo, Zeph M.C., 2020. "Effects of Disclosing Influencer Marketing in Videos: An Eye Tracking Study Among Children in Early Adolescence," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 94-106.
    15. Rares MOCANU, 2013. "Brand Image as a Function of Self-Image and Self-Brand Connection," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 1(3), pages 387-408, December.
    16. Carter, Owen B.J. & Patterson, Lisa J. & Donovan, Robert J. & Ewing, Michael T. & Roberts, Clare M., 2011. "Children's understanding of the selling versus persuasive intent of junk food advertising: Implications for regulation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 962-968, March.
    17. Oliver Büttner & Arnd Florack & Benjamin Serfas, 2014. "A Dual-Step and Dual-Process Model of Advertising Effects: Implications for Reducing the Negative Impact of Advertising on Children's Consumption Behaviour," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 161-182, June.
    18. Robert Aitken & Leah Watkins, 2017. "“Harm or Good?”: Consumer Perceptions of Corporate Strategic Giving in Schools," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 406-432, July.
    19. Ana Côrte-Real & Paulo Lencastre, 2009. "CHILDREN THOUGHTS about BRANDS," Working Papers de Gestão (Management Working Papers) 10, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
    20. Feenstra, Florence & Muzellec, Laurent & de Faultrier, Brigitte & Boulay, Jacques, 2015. "Edutainment experiences for children in retail stores, from a child’s perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 47-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:37:y:2014:i:2:p:205-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.