IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v150y2021ics1364032121007383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno economic analysis of a micro Gas-to-Liquid unit for associated natural gas conversion

Author

Listed:
  • Pauletto, Gianluca
  • Galli, Federico
  • Gaillardet, Alice
  • Mocellin, Paolo
  • Patience, Gregory S.

Abstract

Flared and vented natural gas in remote regions of the world contribute ¿1% of the total CO2 emissions. High investment costs to build facilities to treat this gas and labor costs to operate the infrastructure are deterrents to addressing this environmental burden. Here we report a techno-economic analysis of a commercial mobile manufacturing plant that processes 2400 m3 d-1 of methane via a tandem short contact time catalytic partial oxidation (CPOX) and a single-pass Fischer–Tropsch fluidized bed to produce 7 bbl d-1. Starting from methane and air, a thermodynamic analysis identified the optimized operating conditions considering both carbon yield, CO/H2 ratio and adiabatic conditions. We studied the flammability limits of the mixture at operating pressures and temperatures. The economic analysis itemizes costs for all equipment rather than applying scale-up power law or factors. The greatest contributors to direct costs are the compressors and the CPOX reactor. Operating CPOX at 2.0 MPa reduces reactor volumes but to achieve 90% conversion and selectivity requires operating this unit above 900 °C. Avoiding syngas compression and upstream syngas conditioning reduces capital costs. The capital cost (CAPEX) reaches 570 000 USD when the whole process operates at 2.0 MPa. Considering numbering-up, the price of the 100th unit approaches 360 000 USD thus the MRU increases profitability. We demonstrate how thermodynamics constrains methane conversion and syngas selectivity. A large part of achieving low CAPEX is operating a single pass process, building multiple units, and replacing the methane to heat the treater at the oil tank battery with the incondensable gas leaving the three phases separator downstream the Fischer–Tropsch reactor.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauletto, Gianluca & Galli, Federico & Gaillardet, Alice & Mocellin, Paolo & Patience, Gregory S., 2021. "Techno economic analysis of a micro Gas-to-Liquid unit for associated natural gas conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:150:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121007383
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121007383
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zdzisław Jaworski & Paulina Pianko-Oprych, 2018. "A Comparative Thermodynamic Study of Equilibrium Conditions for Carbon Deposition from Catalytic C–H–O Reformates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Marvin B. Lieberman, 1989. "The learning curve, technology barriers to entry, and competitive survival in the chemical processing industries," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(5), pages 431-447, September.
    3. Herz, Gregor & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias, 2017. "Design and evaluation of a Fischer-Tropsch process for the production of waxes from biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 370-381.
    4. Ramberg, David J. & Henry Chen, Y.H. & Paltsev, Sergey & Parsons, John E., 2017. "The economic viability of gas-to-liquids technology and the crude oil–natural gas price relationship," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 13-21.
    5. Mohajerani, Sara & Kumar, Amit & Oni, Abayomi Olufemi, 2018. "A techno-economic assessment of gas-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid plants through the development of scale factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 681-693.
    6. Blumberg, Timo & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "Exergy-based evaluation of methanol production from natural gas with CO2 utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2528-2539.
    7. Reyes Valle, C. & Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Vidal-Barrero, F. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of biomass-to-ethanol by indirect fluidized bed gasification: Impact of reforming technologies and comparison with entrained flow gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 254-266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigues, A.C.C., 2022. "Decreasing natural gas flaring in Brazilian oil and gas industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Do, Thai Ngan & Hur, Young Gul & Chung, Hegwon & Kim, Jiyong, 2023. "Potentials and benefit assessment of green fuels from residue gas via gas-to-liquid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Techno-economic and climate impact analysis of carbon utilization process for methanol production from blast furnace gas over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Atsonios, Konstantinos & Kougioumtzis, Michael-Alexander & D. Panopoulos, Kyriakos & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2015. "Alternative thermochemical routes for aviation biofuels via alcohols synthesis: Process modeling, techno-economic assessment and comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 346-366.
    3. Sandro Montresor & Antonio Vezzani, 2015. "On the R&D giants’ shoulders: do FDI help to stand on them?," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 42(1), pages 33-60, March.
    4. Bichescu, Bogdan & Raturi, Amitabh, 2015. "The antecedents and consequences of plant closing announcements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 197-210.
    5. Angel Sevil & Alfonso Cruz & Tomas Reyes & Roberto Vassolo, 2022. "When Being Large Is Not an Advantage: How Innovation Impacts the Sustainability of Firm Performance in Natural Resource Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Claussen, Jörg & Kretschmer, Tobias & Spengler, Thomas, 2010. "Market leadership through technology – Backward compatibility in the U.S. Handheld Video Game Industry," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 12716, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
    7. Shah, Vedant & Cheng, Zhuo & Baser, Deven S. & Fan, Jonathan A. & Fan, Liang-Shih, 2021. "Highly Selective Production of Syngas from Chemical Looping Reforming of Methane with CO2 Utilization on MgO-supported Calcium Ferrite Redox Materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    8. Gagarin, H. & Sridhar, S. & Lange, I. & Bazilian, M.D., 2020. "Considering non-power generation uses of coal in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    9. Gopalakrishnan, S. & Damanpour, F., 1997. "A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 15-28, February.
    10. Tiantian Yang & Tie Wang & Guoxing Li & Jinhong Shi & Xiuquan Sun, 2018. "Vibration Characteristics of Compression Ignition Engines Fueled with Blended Petro-Diesel and Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuel from Coal Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Reyes Valle, C. & Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Vidal-Barrero, F. & Ollero, P., 2015. "Integrated economic and life cycle assessment of thermochemical production of bioethanol to reduce production cost by exploiting excess of greenhouse gas savings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 466-475.
    12. Salkuyeh, Yaser Khojasteh & Elkamel, Ali & Thé, Jesse & Fowler, Michael, 2016. "Development and techno-economic analysis of an integrated petroleum coke, biomass, and natural gas polygeneration process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 861-874.
    13. April M. Franco & MB Sarkar & Rajshree Agarwal & Raj Echambadi, 2009. "Swift and Smart: The Moderating Effects of Technological Capabilities on the Market Pioneering-Firm Survival Relationship," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(11), pages 1842-1860, November.
    14. Yih-Hang Chen & David Shan-Hill Wong & Ya-Chien Chen & Chao-Min Chang & Hsuan Chang, 2019. "Design and Performance Comparison of Methanol Production Processes with Carbon Dioxide Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Taylor-de-Lima, Reynaldo L.N. & Gerbasi da Silva, Arthur José & Legey, Luiz F.L. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2018. "Evaluation of economic feasibility under uncertainty of a thermochemical route for ethanol production in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 363-376.
    16. Chaiwatanodom, Paphonwit & Vivanpatarakij, Supawat & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification with CO2 recycle for synthesis gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 10-17.
    17. Rodrigues, A.C.C., 2022. "Decreasing natural gas flaring in Brazilian oil and gas industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Ashish Arora & Alfonso Gambardella, 2011. "Implications for Energy Innovation from the Chemical Industry," NBER Chapters, in: Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors, pages 87-111, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Nakyai, Teeranun & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai & Saebea, Dang, 2020. "Comparative exergoeconomic analysis of indirect and direct bio-dimethyl ether syntheses based on air-steam biomass gasification with CO2 utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    20. Li, Xiaodong & Jinxi, Wang, 2023. "A novel process for the simultaneous production of methanol, oxygen, and electricity using a PEM electrolyzer and agricultural-based landfill gas-fed oxyfuel combustion power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:150:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121007383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.