IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v113y2016icp861-874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and techno-economic analysis of an integrated petroleum coke, biomass, and natural gas polygeneration process

Author

Listed:
  • Salkuyeh, Yaser Khojasteh
  • Elkamel, Ali
  • Thé, Jesse
  • Fowler, Michael

Abstract

This work presents the techno-economic analysis results of a novel polygeneration process that converts biomass, petcoke, and natural gas into methanol, ethanol, DME, olefins, FT-liquids, and electricity, while eliminating CO2 emissions. A comprehensive process simulation model was developed in Aspen Plus. The economic optimization of the plant is performed for a wide range of biomass to petcoke ratios: 0%, 5%, 10%, and 20%, using the particle swarm optimization technique. Moreover, five different optimization scenarios are considered for each feedstock including maximizing profitability of the plant, maximizing petcoke utilization, maximizing fuel production, maximizing olefin production and maximizing ethanol production. The economic optimization results showed that up to 65% of feedstock inlet can be a petcoke/biomass mixture while the process is still profitable. In addition, the results indicate that the methanol scenario leads to the minimum thermal efficiency and NPV compared to the other chemical production units.

Suggested Citation

  • Salkuyeh, Yaser Khojasteh & Elkamel, Ali & Thé, Jesse & Fowler, Michael, 2016. "Development and techno-economic analysis of an integrated petroleum coke, biomass, and natural gas polygeneration process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 861-874.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:861-874
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216310192
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khojasteh Salkuyeh, Yaser & Adams, Thomas A., 2015. "Integrated petroleum coke and natural gas polygeneration process with zero carbon emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 479-490.
    2. Naik, Satyanarayan & Goud, Vaibhav V. & Rout, Prasant K. & Jacobson, Kathlene & Dalai, Ajay K., 2010. "Characterization of Canadian biomass for alternative renewable biofuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1624-1631.
    3. Kvamsdal, Hanne M. & Jordal, Kristin & Bolland, Olav, 2007. "A quantitative comparison of gas turbine cycles with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 10-24.
    4. Yaser Khojasteh Salkuyeh & Thomas A. Adams II, 2015. "Co-Production of Olefins, Fuels, and Electricity from Conventional Pipeline Gas and Shale Gas with Near-Zero CO 2 Emissions. Part I: Process Development and Technical Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Clausen, Lasse R. & Elmegaard, Brian & Houbak, Niels, 2010. "Technoeconomic analysis of a low CO2 emission dimethyl ether (DME) plant based on gasification of torrefied biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4831-4842.
    6. Yaser Khojasteh Salkuyeh & Thomas A. Adams II, 2015. "Co-Production of Olefins, Fuels, and Electricity from Conventional Pipeline Gas and Shale Gas with Near-Zero CO 2 Emissions. Part II: Economic Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-13, April.
    7. Reyes Valle, C. & Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Vidal-Barrero, F. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of biomass-to-ethanol by indirect fluidized bed gasification: Impact of reforming technologies and comparison with entrained flow gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 254-266.
    8. Chmielniak, Tomasz & Sciazko, Marek, 2003. "Co-gasification of biomass and coal for methanol synthesis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(3-4), pages 393-403, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang, Dong & Xiang, Junjie & Sun, Zhe & Cao, Yan, 2017. "The integrated coke-oven gas and pulverized coke gasification for methanol production with highly efficient hydrogen utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 78-91.
    2. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Adams, Thomas A., 2021. "Optimal design and operation of a waste tire feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Techno-economic and climate impact analysis of carbon utilization process for methanol production from blast furnace gas over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brigagão, George Victor & de Medeiros, José Luiz & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Duić, Neven, 2021. "A zero-emission sustainable landfill-gas-to-wire oxyfuel process: Bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Adams, Thomas A., 2021. "Optimal design and operation of a waste tire feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Manasrah, Abdallah D. & Nassar, Nashaat N., 2020. "Oxy-cracking technique for producing non-combustion products from residual feedstocks and cleaning up wastewater," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Jiang, Peng & Parvez, Ashak Mahmud & Meng, Yang & Xu, Meng-xia & Shui, Tian-chi & Sun, Cheng-gong & Wu, Tao, 2019. "Exergetic, economic and carbon emission studies of bio-olefin production via indirect steam gasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Gutiérrez, R.E. & Guerra, K. & Haro, P., 2022. "Exploring the techno-economic feasibility of new bioeconomy concepts: Solar-assisted thermochemical biorefineries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    6. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I. & Adams, Thomas A., 2022. "Global optimization of a hybrid waste tire and natural gas feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    7. Hoseinzade, Leila & Adams, Thomas A., 2019. "Techno-economic and environmental analyses of a novel, sustainable process for production of liquid fuels using helium heat transfer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 850-866.
    8. Blumberg, Timo & Lee, Young Duk & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2019. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of methanol production by steam reforming and autothermal reforming of natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1273-1284.
    9. Atsonios, Konstantinos & Kougioumtzis, Michael-Alexander & D. Panopoulos, Kyriakos & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2015. "Alternative thermochemical routes for aviation biofuels via alcohols synthesis: Process modeling, techno-economic assessment and comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 346-366.
    10. Zhang, Ziyin & Pang, Shusheng & Levi, Tana, 2017. "Influence of AAEM species in coal and biomass on steam co-gasification of chars of blended coal and biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 356-363.
    11. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Chen, Chih-Jung & Hung, Chen-I & Shen, Cheng-Hsien & Hsu, Heng-Wen, 2013. "A comparison of gasification phenomena among raw biomass, torrefied biomass and coal in an entrained-flow reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 421-430.
    12. Uddin, Md Mosleh & Simson, Amanda & Wright, Mark Mba, 2020. "Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emission analysis of dimethyl ether production via the bi-reforming pathway for transportation fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    13. Luo, Chending & Zhang, Na, 2012. "Zero CO2 emission SOLRGT power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 312-323.
    14. Ziółkowski, Paweł & Stasiak, Kamil & Amiri, Milad & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2023. "Negative carbon dioxide gas power plant integrated with gasification of sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    15. Yi, Qun & Gong, Min-Hui & Huang, Yi & Feng, Jie & Hao, Yan-Hong & Zhang, Ji-Long & Li, Wen-Ying, 2016. "Process development of coke oven gas to methanol integrated with CO2 recycle for satisfactory techno-economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 618-628.
    16. Su, Li-Wang & Li, Xiang-Rong & Sun, Zuo-Yu, 2013. "Flow chart of methanol in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 541-550.
    17. Turi, Davide Maria & Chiesa, Paolo & Macchi, Ennio & Ghoniem, Ahmed F., 2016. "High fidelity model of the oxygen flux across ion transport membrane reactor: Mechanism characterization using experimental data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 127-141.
    18. Mancini, Enrico & Tian, Hailin & Angelidaki, Irini & Fotidis, Ioannis A., 2021. "The implications of using organic-rich industrial wastewater as biomethanation feedstocks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Martelli, Emanuele & Nord, Lars O. & Bolland, Olav, 2012. "Design criteria and optimization of heat recovery steam cycles for integrated reforming combined cycles with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 255-268.
    20. Collazo, Joaquín & Pazó, José Antonio & Granada, Enrique & Saavedra, Ángeles & Eguía, Pablo, 2012. "Determination of the specific heat of biomass materials and the combustion energy of coke by DSC analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 746-752.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:861-874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.