IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v148y2021ics1364032121005049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An economic viability and environmental impact assessment of mango processing waste-based biorefineries for co-producing bioenergy and bioactive compounds

Author

Listed:
  • Manhongo, T.T.
  • Chimphango, A.
  • Thornley, P.
  • Röder, M.

Abstract

Process feasibility, economic viability, and environmental impacts of model integrated biorefineries based on a 62.5 metric tonnes of mango processing waste per hour plant capacity, for co-producing bioenergy and bioactive compounds were evaluated using three scenarios for integration with a dried mango chips processing facility. Scenario I modeled an integrated biorefinery for anaerobic digestion (AD) of mango peel and wastewater for biogas production. Scenario II integrated extraction and recovery of pectin from mango peel while scenario III involved the sequential recovery of pectin and polyphenols from the peel before AD. In all scenarios, the biogas from AD is co-combusted with mango seeds to produce heat and electricity, thus representing integrated biorefineries for co-production of bioactive compounds with bioenergy. Scenario III is the most attractive option in terms of profitability, with a net present value of $ 57.2 million compared to - $ 86.4 million and $ 50.0 million for Scenarios I and II respectively. However, results from the life cycle analysis suggest that it is the least auspicious with a global warming potential (GWP) of 15.9 kg CO2 eq,/tonne of waste processed when compared to Scenarios I and II with GWP values of 12.1 and 12.8 kg CO2 eq./tonne, respectively. The results demonstrate both process and economic feasibility for the co-production of bioenergy and bioactives at the base plant capacity. Nonetheless, a trade-off between environmental and economic benefits should be established when making choices for implementing mango waste biorefineries since improved profitability is at the expense of higher environmental burdens.

Suggested Citation

  • Manhongo, T.T. & Chimphango, A. & Thornley, P. & Röder, M., 2021. "An economic viability and environmental impact assessment of mango processing waste-based biorefineries for co-producing bioenergy and bioactive compounds," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:148:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121005049
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121005049
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    2. Hernández, Valentina & Romero-García, Juan M. & Dávila, Javier A. & Castro, Eulogio & Cardona, Carlos A., 2014. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of an olive stone based biorefinery," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 145-150.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Genel, Salih & Durak, Halil & Durak, Emre Demirer & Güneş, Hasret & Genel, Yaşar, 2023. "Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass with molybdenum, aluminum, cobalt metal powder catalysts and evaluation of wastewater by fungus cultivation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 20-32.
    2. Nawaz, Ahmad & Razzak, Shaikh Abdur, 2024. "Co-pyrolysis of biomass and different plastic waste to reduce hazardous waste and subsequent production of energy products: A review on advancement, synergies, and future prospects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Yu, Yang & Lei, Zhongfang & Yang, Xi & Yang, Xiaojing & Huang, Weiwei & Shimizu, Kazuya & Zhang, Zhenya, 2018. "Hydrothermal carbonization of anaerobic granular sludge: Effect of process temperature on nutrients availability and energy gain from produced hydrochar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 88-95.
    4. Tahir H. Seehar & Saqib S. Toor & Ayaz A. Shah & Thomas H. Pedersen & Lasse A. Rosendahl, 2020. "Biocrude Production from Wheat Straw at Sub and Supercritical Hydrothermal Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Louw, Jeanne & Dogbe, Eunice S. & Yang, Bin & Görgens, Johann F., 2023. "Prioritisation of biomass-derived products for biorefineries based on economic feasibility: A review on the comparability of techno-economic assessment results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Eric Johnson, 2019. "Process Technologies and Projects for BioLPG," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-29, January.
    7. Munir, M. Tajammal & Mansouri, Seyed Soheil & Udugama, Isuru A. & Baroutian, Saeid & Gernaey, Krist V. & Young, Brent R., 2018. "Resource recovery from organic solid waste using hydrothermal processing: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 64-75.
    8. Ankit Mathanker & Snehlata Das & Deepak Pudasainee & Monir Khan & Amit Kumar & Rajender Gupta, 2021. "A Review of Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Biomass for Biofuels Production with a Special Focus on the Effect of Process Parameters, Co-Solvents, and Extraction Solvents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-60, August.
    9. Zhuang, Xiuzheng & Liu, Jianguo & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Chenguang & Zhan, Hao & Ma, Longlong, 2022. "A review on the utilization of industrial biowaste via hydrothermal carbonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Guodong Yin & Heng Zhong & Guodong Yao & Fangming Jin & Jianfu Zhao, 2021. "Production of Acrylic Acid from Biomass-Derived Fumaric Acid under Hydrothermal Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-9, September.
    11. Briongos, J.V. & Taramona, S. & Gómez-Hernández, J. & Mulone, V. & Santana, D., 2021. "Solar and biomass hybridization through hydrothermal carbonization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 268-279.
    12. Ayaz Ali Shah & Saqib Sohail Toor & Asbjørn Haaning Nielsen & Thomas Helmer Pedersen & Lasse Aistrup Rosendahl, 2021. "Bio-Crude Production through Recycling of Pretreated Aqueous Phase via Activated Carbon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Marco Balsamo & Francesca Di Lauro & Maria Laura Alfieri & Paola Manini & Piero Salatino & Fabio Montagnaro & Roberto Solimene, 2024. "Unravelling the Role of Biochemical Compounds within the Hydrothermal Liquefaction Process of Real Sludge Mixtures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Okolie, Jude A. & Nanda, Sonil & Dalai, Ajay K. & Berruti, Franco & Kozinski, Janusz A., 2020. "A review on subcritical and supercritical water gasification of biogenic, polymeric and petroleum wastes to hydrogen-rich synthesis gas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Wilk, Małgorzata & Śliz, Maciej & Gajek, Marcin, 2021. "The effects of hydrothermal carbonization operating parameters on high-value hydrochar derived from beet pulp," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 216-228.
    16. Saqib Sohail Toor & Ayaz Ali Shah & Kamaldeep Sharma & Tahir Hussain Seehar & Thomas Helmer Pedersen & Lasse Aistrup Rosendahl, 2022. "Bio-Crude Production from Protein-Extracted Grass Residue through Hydrothermal Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Kamaldeep Sharma & Ayaz A. Shah & Saqib S. Toor & Tahir H. Seehar & Thomas H. Pedersen & Lasse A. Rosendahl, 2021. "Co-Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Lignocellulosic Biomass in Supercritical Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Queiroz, Sarah S. & Jofre, Fanny M. & Mussatto, Solange I. & Felipe, Maria das Graças A., 2022. "Scaling up xylitol bioproduction: Challenges to achieve a profitable bioprocess," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Ahmad, Fiaz & Silva, Edson Luiz & Varesche, Maria Bernadete Amâncio, 2018. "Hydrothermal processing of biomass for anaerobic digestion – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 108-124.
    20. Zhao, Kaige & Li, Wanqing & Yu, Yingying & Chen, Guanyi & Yan, Beibei & Cheng, Zhanjun & Zhao, Hai & Fang, Yang, 2023. "Speciation and transformation of nitrogen in the hydrothermal liquefaction of wastewater-treated duckweed for the bio-oil production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 661-670.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:148:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121005049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.