IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v145y2021ics1364032121003865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies

Author

Listed:
  • Aui, A.
  • Wang, Y.
  • Mba-Wright, M.

Abstract

The conversion of cellulosic biomass to ethanol as a viable way of decarbonizing the transportation sector has experienced a growing interest in the last few decades. However, this infant industry still struggles to succeed commercially. To examine the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol, this study conducts a meta-analysis using recently published Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) studies, which compute the Minimum Fuel Selling Price (MFSP) to measure the economic viability of ethanol production. This review finds that ethanol MFSPs range from $0.90–6.00/gallon with an average of $2.65/gallon, which is comparable to retail gasoline prices in the U.S. The considerable variation in MFSP estimates is due to the wide range of assumptions made by TEA studies. The unit cost of production was computed to examine the economies of scale effect, which resulted in a scale factor of 0.69. This estimate affirms the assumptions made by TEA studies. Multivariate linear regression shows that capital cost is positively correlated, while input capacity and output capacity are negatively correlated, with MFSP. These variables significantly impact MFSP, while pathway, feedstock type, and feedstock cost are not statistically significant due partly to data limitations. Findings from this analysis provide insights for improving the economic viability of cellulosic ethanol, which calls for a suite of government policies including financial incentives, mandates, and assistance programs for this industry to thrive.

Suggested Citation

  • Aui, A. & Wang, Y. & Mba-Wright, M., 2021. "Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:145:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121003865
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121003865
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Reyes Valle, C. & Ollero, P. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2011. "Technoeconomic assessment of ethanol production via thermochemical conversion of biomass by entrained flow gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4097-4108.
    2. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    3. Frederick T. Moore, 1959. "Economies of Scale: Some Statistical Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 73(2), pages 232-245.
    4. White, Halbert, 1980. "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 817-838, May.
    5. Diep, Nhu Quynh & Fujimoto, Shinji & Minowa, Tomoaki & Sakanishi, Kinya & Nakagoshi, Nobukazu, 2012. "Estimation of the potential of rice straw for ethanol production and the optimum facility size for different regions in Vietnam," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 205-211.
    6. McDonald, Alan & Schrattenholzer, Leo, 2001. "Learning rates for energy technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 255-261, March.
    7. Zhao, Xuebing & Liu, Dehua, 2019. "Multi-products co-production improves the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A case of Formiline pretreatment-based biorefining," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 229-244.
    8. Fornell, Rickard & Berntsson, Thore & Åsblad, Anders, 2013. "Techno-economic analysis of a kraft pulp-mill-based biorefinery producing both ethanol and dimethyl ether," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 83-92.
    9. He, Jie & Zhang, Wennan, 2011. "Techno-economic evaluation of thermo-chemical biomass-to-ethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1224-1232, April.
    10. Hettinga, W.G. & Junginger, H.M. & Dekker, S.C. & Hoogwijk, M. & McAloon, A.J. & Hicks, K.B., 2009. "Understanding the reductions in US corn ethanol production costs: An experience curve approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 190-203, January.
    11. Mohammad I. Jahirul & Mohammad G. Rasul & Ashfaque Ahmed Chowdhury & Nanjappa Ashwath, 2012. "Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis —A Technological Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-50, November.
    12. Akhtar, Javaid & Amin, Nor Aishah Saidina, 2011. "A review on process conditions for optimum bio-oil yield in hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 1615-1624, April.
    13. Richard Ahorsu & Francesc Medina & Magda Constantí, 2018. "Significance and Challenges of Biomass as a Suitable Feedstock for Bioenergy and Biochemical Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Kenkel, Philip & Holcomb, Rodney B., 2009. "Conditions Necessary for Private Investment in the Ethanol Industry," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 455-464, August.
    15. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    16. Frankó, Balázs & Galbe, Mats & Wallberg, Ola, 2016. "Bioethanol production from forestry residues: A comparative techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 727-736.
    17. Hausman, Jerry & Palmer, Christopher, 2012. "Heteroskedasticity-robust inference in finite samples," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 232-235.
    18. Borrion, Aiduan Li & McManus, Marcelle C. & Hammond, Geoffrey P., 2012. "Environmental life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic conversion to ethanol: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4638-4650.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karin Ericsson, 2021. "Potential for the Integrated Production of Biojet Fuel in Swedish Plant Infrastructures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Prabodh Illukpitiya & Firuz Yuldashev & Kabirat Nasiru, 2022. "Designing Harvesting and Hauling Cost Models for Energy Cane Production for Biorefineries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Larnaudie, Valeria & Ferrari, Mario Daniel & Lareo, Claudia, 2022. "Switchgrass as an alternative biomass for ethanol production in a biorefinery: Perspectives on technology, economics and environmental sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Piradee Jusakulvijit & Alberto Bezama & Daniela Thrän, 2022. "An Integrated Assessment of GIS-MCA with Logistics Analysis for an Assessment of a Potential Decentralized Bioethanol Production System Using Distributed Agricultural Residues in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Gabrielle M. Myers & Daniel S. Andersen & Bobby J. Martens & D. Raj Raman, 2023. "Cost Assessment of Centralizing Swine Manure and Corn Stover Co-Digestion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Nneka B. Ekwe & Maksim V. Tyufekchiev & Ali A. Salifu & Klaus Schmidt-Rohr & Zhaoxi Zheng & Alex R. Maag & Geoffrey A. Tompsett & Charles M. Cai & Emmanuel O. Onche & Ayten Ates & Winston O. Soboyejo , 2022. "Bamboo as a Cost-Effective Source of Renewable Carbon for Sustainable Economic Development in Low- and Middle-Income Economies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Baral, Nawa Raj & Mishra, Shruti K. & George, Anthe & Gautam, Sagar & Mishra, Umakant & Scown, Corinne D., 2022. "Multifunctional landscapes for dedicated bioenergy crops lead to low-carbon market-competitive biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Aui, Alvina & Wang, Yu, 2023. "Cellulosic ethanol production: Assessment of the impacts of learning and plant capacity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Aui, Alvina & Wang, Yu, 2022. "Post-RFS supports for cellulosic ethanol: Evaluation of economic and environmental impacts of alternative policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariana S. T. Amândio & Joana M. Pereira & Jorge M. S. Rocha & Luísa S. Serafim & Ana M. R. B. Xavier, 2022. "Getting Value from Pulp and Paper Industry Wastes: On the Way to Sustainability and Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-31, June.
    2. Romano, Joseph P. & Wolf, Michael, 2017. "Resurrecting weighted least squares," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 1-19.
    3. Clauser, Nicolás M. & Felissia, Fernando E. & Area, María C. & Vallejos, María E., 2021. "A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Taylor-de-Lima, Reynaldo L.N. & Gerbasi da Silva, Arthur José & Legey, Luiz F.L. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2018. "Evaluation of economic feasibility under uncertainty of a thermochemical route for ethanol production in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 363-376.
    5. Menten, Fabio & Chèze, Benoît & Patouillard, Laure & Bouvart, Frédérique, 2013. "A review of LCA greenhouse gas emissions results for advanced biofuels: The use of meta-regression analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 108-134.
    6. Sin, C.Y. (Chor-yiu) & Lee, Cheng-Few, 2021. "Using heteroscedasticity-non-consistent or heteroscedasticity-consistent variances in linear regression," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 117-142.
    7. Reyes Valle, C. & Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Vidal-Barrero, F. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of biomass-to-ethanol by indirect fluidized bed gasification: Impact of reforming technologies and comparison with entrained flow gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 254-266.
    8. Rubin, Edward S. & Azevedo, Inês M.L. & Jaramillo, Paulina & Yeh, Sonia, 2015. "A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 198-218.
    9. Bingyao Zeng & Naoto Shimizu, 2021. "Hydrogen Generation from Wood Chip and Biochar by Combined Continuous Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-11, June.
    10. Jianghao Chu & Tae-Hwy Lee & Aman Ullah & Haifeng Xu, 2020. "Exact Distribution of the F-statistic under Heteroskedasticity of Unknown Form for Improved Inference," Working Papers 202027, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    11. Neil Shephard, 2020. "An estimator for predictive regression: reliable inference for financial economics," Papers 2008.06130, arXiv.org.
    12. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Chen, Yuche & Zhang, Yunteng & Fan, Yueyue & Hu, Kejia & Zhao, Jianyou, 2017. "A dynamic programming approach for modeling low-carbon fuel technology adoption considering learning-by-doing effect," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 825-835.
    14. Méjean, Aurélie & Hope, Chris, 2010. "Modelling the costs of energy crops: A case study of US corn and Brazilian sugar cane," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 547-561, January.
    15. Fazeni, Karin & Lindorfer, Johannes & Prammer, Heinz, 2014. "Methodological advancements in Life Cycle Process Design: A preliminary outlook," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 66-77.
    16. Zhu, Shengdong & Huang, Wenjing & Huang, Wangxiang & Wang, Ke & Chen, Qiming & Wu, Yuanxin, 2015. "Pretreatment of rice straw for ethanol production by a two-step process using dilute sulfuric acid and sulfomethylation reagent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 190-196.
    17. Vasilakou, Konstantina & Nimmegeers, Philippe & Thomassen, Gwenny & Billen, Pieter & Van Passel, Steven, 2023. "Assessing the future of second-generation bioethanol by 2030 – A techno-economic assessment integrating technology learning curves," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    18. Richard, Patrick, 2017. "Robust heteroskedasticity-robust tests," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 28-32.
    19. Matei Demetrescu & Christoph Hanck, 2013. "Nonlinear IV panel unit root testing under structural breaks in the error variance," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1043-1066, November.
    20. Solarte-Toro, Juan Camilo & González-Aguirre, Jose Andrés & Poveda Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro & Cardona Alzate, Carlos A., 2021. "Thermochemical processing of woody biomass: A review focused on energy-driven applications and catalytic upgrading," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:145:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121003865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.