IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i12p3366-d187033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Significance and Challenges of Biomass as a Suitable Feedstock for Bioenergy and Biochemical Production: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Ahorsu

    (Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Francesc Medina

    (Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Magda Constantí

    (Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain)

Abstract

Fossil fuels have been a major contributor to greenhouse gases, the amounts of which could be reduced if biofuels such as bioethanol and biodiesel were used for transportation. One of the most promising biofuels is ethyl alcohol. In 2015, the world production of ethanol was 25.6 billion gallons and the USA, Brazil, China, the European Union, and 28 other countries have set targets for blending ethanol with gasoline. The two major bio-source materials used for ethanol production are corn and sugarcane. For 1st generation biofuels, sugarcane and corn feedstocks are not able to fulfill the current demand for alcohol. Non-edible lignocellulosic biomass is an alternative bio-source for creating 2nd generation biofuels and algae biomass for 3rd and 4th generation biofuels. This review discusses the significance of biomass for the different generations of biofuels, and biochemical and thermochemical processes, and the significance of biorefinery products.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Ahorsu & Francesc Medina & Magda Constantí, 2018. "Significance and Challenges of Biomass as a Suitable Feedstock for Bioenergy and Biochemical Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3366-:d:187033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3366/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3366/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Long, Huiling & Li, Xiaobing & Wang, Hong & Jia, Jingdun, 2013. "Biomass resources and their bioenergy potential estimation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 344-352.
    2. Azadi, Pooya & Inderwildi, Oliver R. & Farnood, Ramin & King, David A., 2013. "Liquid fuels, hydrogen and chemicals from lignin: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 506-523.
    3. Bridgwater, A. V. & Peacocke, G. V. C., 2000. "Fast pyrolysis processes for biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 1-73, March.
    4. Carraretto, C. & Macor, A. & Mirandola, A. & Stoppato, A. & Tonon, S., 2004. "Biodiesel as alternative fuel: Experimental analysis and energetic evaluations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2195-2211.
    5. Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Murphy, Jerry D., 2010. "What type of digester configurations should be employed to produce biomethane from grass silage?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 1558-1568, August.
    6. Lim, Jeng Shiun & Abdul Manan, Zainuddin & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Hashim, Haslenda, 2012. "A review on utilisation of biomass from rice industry as a source of renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3084-3094.
    7. Gani, Asri & Naruse, Ichiro, 2007. "Effect of cellulose and lignin content on pyrolysis and combustion characteristics for several types of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 649-661.
    8. Brennan, Liam & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Biofuels from microalgae--A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 557-577, February.
    9. Fatih Demirbas, M., 2009. "Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(Supplemen), pages 151-161, November.
    10. Sosa, Amanda & Acuna, Mauricio & McDonnell, Kevin & Devlin, Ger, 2015. "Controlling moisture content and truck configurations to model and optimise biomass supply chain logistics in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 338-351.
    11. Koçar, Günnur & Civaş, Nilgün, 2013. "An overview of biofuels from energy crops: Current status and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 900-916.
    12. Eckert, C.T. & Frigo, E.P. & Albrecht, L.P. & Albrecht, A.J.P. & Christ, D. & Santos, W.G. & Berkembrock, E. & Egewarth, V.A., 2018. "Maize ethanol production in Brazil: Characteristics and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3907-3912.
    13. Manochio, C. & Andrade, B.R. & Rodriguez, R.P. & Moraes, B.S., 2017. "Ethanol from biomass: A comparative overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 743-755.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Zhang & Yun-Ze Li & Ao-Bing Wang & Li-Jun Gao & Hui-Juan Xu & Xian-Wen Ning, 2020. "The Development Strategies and Technology Roadmap of Bioenergy for a Typical Region: A Case Study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Tripathi, Manoj & Sahu, J.N. & Ganesan, P., 2016. "Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 467-481.
    3. Tomasz Rokicki & Marcin Ratajczak & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Barbara Gradziuk & Piotr Gradziuk & Agnieszka Siedlecka, 2021. "Energy Self-Subsistence of Agriculture in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.
    5. Perkins, Greg & Bhaskar, Thallada & Konarova, Muxina, 2018. "Process development status of fast pyrolysis technologies for the manufacture of renewable transport fuels from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 292-315.
    6. Theodore Dickerson & Juan Soria, 2013. "Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Maity, Sunil K., 2015. "Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part II," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1446-1466.
    8. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    9. Paola Sakai & Stavros Afionis & Nicola Favretto & Lindsay C. Stringer & Caroline Ward & Marco Sakai & Pedro Henrique Weirich Neto & Carlos Hugo Rocha & Jaime Alberti Gomes & Nátali Maidl de Souza & No, 2020. "Understanding the Implications of Alternative Bioenergy Crops to Support Smallholder Farmers in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Huang, Yu-Fong & Kuan, Wen-Hui & Chang, Chun-Yuan, 2018. "Effects of particle size, pretreatment, and catalysis on microwave pyrolysis of corn stover," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 696-703.
    11. Ji, Xi & Long, Xianling, 2016. "A review of the ecological and socioeconomic effects of biofuel and energy policy recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 41-52.
    12. Banerjee, Sanjukta & Banerjee, Srijoni & Ghosh, Ananta K. & Das, Debabrata, 2020. "Maneuvering the genetic and metabolic pathway for improving biofuel production in algae: Present status and future prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Kuo, Hsiu-Po & Hou, Bo-Ren & Huang, An-Ni, 2017. "The influences of the gas fluidization velocity on the properties of bio-oils from fluidized bed pyrolyzer with in-line distillation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 279-286.
    14. Żyromski, Andrzej & Szulczewski, Wiesław & Biniak-Pieróg, Małgorzata & Jakubowski, Wojciech, 2016. "The estimation of basket willow (Salix viminalis) yield – New approach. Part I: Background and statistical description," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1118-1126.
    15. Balasubramani Ravindran & Sanjay Kumar Gupta & Won-Mo Cho & Jung Kon Kim & Sang Ryong Lee & Kwang-Hwa Jeong & Dong Jun Lee & Hee-Chul Choi, 2016. "Microalgae Potential and Multiple Roles—Current Progress and Future Prospects—An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Chen, Fuxin & Hou, Binbin & Chen, Suying & Zhang, Huikuan & Gong, Pin & Zhou, Anning, 2017. "Biochemicals distribution and the collaborative pyrolysis study from three main components of Helianthus annuus stems based on PY-GC/MS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 960-967.
    17. Zhang, Xueyan & Zhang, Xiaoyu & Sun, Ningyue & Wang, Shengtian & Wang, Xiaohong & Jiang, Zijang, 2019. "High production of levulinic acid from cellulosic feedstocks being catalyzed by temperature-responsive transition metal substituted heteropolyacids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 802-813.
    18. Yang, Xiaoguang & Choi, Han Suk & Park, Chulhwan & Kim, Seung Wook, 2015. "Current states and prospects of organic waste utilization for biorefineries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 335-349.
    19. Ambursa, Murtala M. & Juan, Joon Ching & Yahaya, Y. & Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. & Lin, Yu-Chuan & Lee, Hwei Voon, 2021. "A review on catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of lignin to transportation fuels by using nickel-based catalysts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Shi, Yan & Du, Yuanyuan & Yang, Guofu & Tang, Yuli & Fan, Likun & Zhang, Jun & Lu, Yijun & Ge, Ying & Chang, Jie, 2013. "The use of green waste from tourist attractions for renewable energy production: The potential and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 410-418.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3366-:d:187033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.