IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p9885-d884806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Assessment of GIS-MCA with Logistics Analysis for an Assessment of a Potential Decentralized Bioethanol Production System Using Distributed Agricultural Residues in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Piradee Jusakulvijit

    (Department of Bioenergy, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
    Faculty of Economics and Management Science, University of Leipzig, Grimmaische Straße 12, 04109 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Alberto Bezama

    (Department of Bioenergy, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Daniela Thrän

    (Department of Bioenergy, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
    Faculty of Economics and Management Science, University of Leipzig, Grimmaische Straße 12, 04109 Leipzig, Germany
    Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gGmbH—DBFZ, Torgauer Str. 116 D, 04347 Leipzig, Germany)

Abstract

Crop residues derived from post-harvesting process have been problematic due to an on-field incineration, which caused air pollutants and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. An appropriate utilization of those biomasses can improve the environmental situation and provide a substitute for fossil fuels. Therefore, this study intends to analyze how left-over agricultural residues should be valorized in the decentralized bioethanol production configuration. With integrated techniques of geographical information system and multi-criteria analysis (GIS-MCA), we identify suitable locations for exhibiting decentralized sites matching the geographical backgrounds in each region. Under the precondition of a complete utilization of the agricultural residues, we found optimal installation numbers 71 units of decentralized production in total through suitability analysis. Conducting the location–allocation model, it is possible to determine production scales from the collectable spatially distributed biomass and transportation distances. Under the presumed conditions of installing 1 to 25 units, the logistics cost and total capital investment can reach USD 1.17–2.46 L −1 and USD 1.17–6.93 L −1 , respectively. The results from examining the technical potential and economic feasibility aspects are key to designing decentralized bioethanol production facilities and maximizing the utilization of agricultural residues in Thailand.

Suggested Citation

  • Piradee Jusakulvijit & Alberto Bezama & Daniela Thrän, 2022. "An Integrated Assessment of GIS-MCA with Logistics Analysis for an Assessment of a Potential Decentralized Bioethanol Production System Using Distributed Agricultural Residues in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9885-:d:884806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sujung Heo & Joon Weon Choi, 2019. "Potential and Environmental Impacts of Liquid Biofuel from Agricultural Residues in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Sultana, Arifa & Kumar, Amit, 2012. "Optimal siting and size of bioenergy facilities using geographic information system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 192-201.
    3. Tamás Mizik, 2021. "Economic Aspects and Sustainability of Ethanol Production—A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Kudakasseril Kurian, Jiby & Raveendran Nair, Gopu & Hussain, Abid & Vijaya Raghavan, G.S., 2013. "Feedstocks, logistics and pre-treatment processes for sustainable lignocellulosic biorefineries: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 205-219.
    5. Blanca Antizar-Ladislao & Juan L. Turrion-Gomez, 2010. "Decentralized Energy from Waste Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Delivand, Mitra Kami & Barz, Mirko & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2011. "Logistics cost analysis of rice straw for biomass power generation in Thailand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1435-1441.
    7. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Perpiñá, C. & Alfonso, D. & Pérez-Navarro, A. & Peñalvo, E. & Vargas, C. & Cárdenas, R., 2009. "Methodology based on Geographic Information Systems for biomass logistics and transport optimisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 555-565.
    9. Tian Li & Chaoji Chen & Alexandra H. Brozena & J. Y. Zhu & Lixian Xu & Carlos Driemeier & Jiaqi Dai & Orlando J. Rojas & Akira Isogai & Lars Wågberg & Liangbing Hu, 2021. "Developing fibrillated cellulose as a sustainable technological material," Nature, Nature, vol. 590(7844), pages 47-56, February.
    10. Sahoo, K. & Hawkins, G.L. & Yao, X.A. & Samples, K. & Mani, S., 2016. "GIS-based biomass assessment and supply logistics system for a sustainable biorefinery: A case study with cotton stalks in the Southeastern US," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 260-273.
    11. Fleischmann, Mortiz & Krikke, Hans Ronald & Dekker, Rommert & Flapper, Simme Douwe P., 2000. "A characterisation of logistics networks for product recovery," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 653-666, December.
    12. Penwadee Cheewaphongphan & Agapol Junpen & Orachorn Kamnoet & Savitri Garivait, 2018. "Study on the Potential of Rice Straws as a Supplementary Fuel in Very Small Power Plants in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Höhn, J. & Lehtonen, E. & Rasi, S. & Rintala, J., 2014. "A Geographical Information System (GIS) based methodology for determination of potential biomasses and sites for biogas plants in southern Finland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-10.
    14. Kocoloski, Matt & Michael Griffin, W. & Scott Matthews, H., 2011. "Impacts of facility size and location decisions on ethanol production cost," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 47-56, January.
    15. Lars Wietschel & Lukas Messmann & Andrea Thorenz & Axel Tuma, 2021. "Environmental benefits of large‐scale second‐generation bioethanol production in the EU: An integrated supply chain network optimization and life cycle assessment approach," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 677-692, June.
    16. Singh, R.P. & Embrandiri, A. & Ibrahim, M.H. & Esa, N., 2011. "Management of biomass residues generated from palm oil mill: Vermicomposting a sustainable option," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 423-434.
    17. Famoso, F. & Prestipino, M. & Brusca, S. & Galvagno, A., 2020. "Designing sustainable bioenergy from residual biomass: Site allocation criteria and energy/exergy performance indicators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    18. Jayarathna, Lasinidu & Kent, Geoff & O'Hara, Ian & Hobson, Philip, 2020. "A Geographical Information System based framework to identify optimal location and size of biomass energy plants using single or multiple biomass types," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    19. Daylan, B. & Ciliz, N., 2016. "Life cycle assessment and environmental life cycle costing analysis of lignocellulosic bioethanol as an alternative transportation fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 578-587.
    20. Hossain, Tasmin & Jones, Daniela & Hartley, Damon & Griffel, L. Michael & Lin, Yingqian & Burli, Pralhad & Thompson, David N. & Langholtz, Matthew & Davis, Maggie & Brandt, Craig, 2021. "The nth-plant scenario for blended feedstock conversion and preprocessing nationwide: Biorefineries and depots," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    21. Aui, A. & Wang, Y. & Mba-Wright, M., 2021. "Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Evaluation of biogas potential from livestock manures and rural wastes using GIS in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 351-356.
    3. Jayarathna, Lasinidu & Kent, Geoff & O'Hara, Ian & Hobson, Philip, 2020. "A Geographical Information System based framework to identify optimal location and size of biomass energy plants using single or multiple biomass types," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    4. Xiang Zhao & Xiaoya Ma & Kun Wang & Yuqing Long & Dongjie Zhang & Zhanchun Xiao, 2017. "A Spatially Explicit Optimization Model for Agricultural Straw-Based Power Plant Site Selection: A Case Study in Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Senocak, Ahmet Alp & Guner Goren, Hacer, 2023. "Three-phase artificial intelligence-geographic information systems-based biomass network design approach: A case study in Denizli," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    6. Shu, Kesheng & Schneider, Uwe A. & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2017. "Optimizing the bioenergy industry infrastructure: Transportation networks and bioenergy plant locations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 247-261.
    7. Lozano-García, Diego Fabián & Santibañez-Aguilar, José Ezequiel & Lozano, Francisco J. & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio, 2020. "GIS-based modeling of residual biomass availability for energy and production in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Chakraborty, Abhishek & Biswal, Anima & Pandey, Varun & Shadab, Syed & Kalyandeep, K. & Murthy, C.S. & Seshasai, M.V.R. & Rao, P.V.N. & Jain, Niveta & Sehgal, V.K. & Kaushik, Nirmala & Singh, Sanjay &, 2022. "Developing a spatial information system of biomass potential from crop residues over India: A decision support for planning and establishment of biofuel/biomass power plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Chopin, Pierre & Guindé, Loïc & Causeret, François & Bergkvist, Göran & Blazy, Jean-Marc, 2019. "Integrating stakeholder preferences into assessment of scenarios for electricity production from locally produced biomass on a small island," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 128-136.
    10. Seyed Hashem Mousavi-Avval & Sami Khanal & Ajay Shah, 2023. "Assessment of Potential Pennycress Availability and Suitable Sites for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Refineries in Ohio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Zhou, Jianli & Wu, Yunna & Tao, Yao & Gao, Jianwei & Zhong, Zhiming & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Geographic information big data-driven two-stage optimization model for location decision of hydrogen refueling stations: An empirical study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    12. Chen, Yan & Huang, Zhenhua & Ai, Hongshan & Guo, Xingkun & Luo, Fan, 2021. "The Impact of GIS/GPS Network Information Systems on the Logistics Distribution Cost of Tobacco Enterprises," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Prabodh Illukpitiya & Firuz Yuldashev & Kabirat Nasiru, 2022. "Designing Harvesting and Hauling Cost Models for Energy Cane Production for Biorefineries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-12, July.
    14. Avinash Bharti & Kunwar Paritosh & Venkata Ravibabu Mandla & Aakash Chawade & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2021. "GIS Application for the Estimation of Bioenergy Potential from Agriculture Residues: An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Tomaž Levstek & Črtomir Rozman, 2022. "A Model for Finding a Suitable Location for a Micro Biogas Plant Using Gis Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Costa, Fabrício Rodrigues & Ribeiro, Carlos Antonio Alvares Soares & Marcatti, Gustavo Eduardo & Lorenzon, Alexandre Simões & Teixeira, Thaisa Ribeiro & Domingues, Getulio Fonseca & Castro, Nero Lemos, 2020. "GIS applied to location of bioenergy plants in tropical agricultural areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 911-918.
    17. Arnò, Paolo & Fiore, Silvia & Verda, Vittorio, 2017. "Assessment of anaerobic co-digestion in areas with heterogeneous waste production densities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 221-236.
    18. Mikkel Bojesen & Luc Boerboom & Hans Skov-Petersen, 2014. "Towards a sustainable capacity expansion of the Danish biogas sector," IFRO Working Paper 2014/03, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    19. Sultana, Arifa & Kumar, Amit, 2014. "Development of tortuosity factor for assessment of lignocellulosic biomass delivery cost to a biorefinery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 288-295.
    20. Seyed Ali Haji Esmaeili & Ahmad Sobhani & Sajad Ebrahimi & Joseph Szmerekovsky & Alan Dybing & Amin Keramati, 2023. "Location Allocation of Biorefineries for a Switchgrass-Based Bioethanol Supply Chain Using Energy Consumption and Emissions," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9885-:d:884806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.