IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v237y2024ipbs0960148124017373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria optimization next to a comparative analysis of a polygeneration layout based on a double-stage gas turbine cycle fueled by biomass and hydrogen

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Shulong
  • Huang, Xuechen
  • Zhang, Jinfeng
  • Gao, Chao
  • Wan, Qian
  • Feng, Dulong

Abstract

The significance and advantages of utilizing renewable energy sources are widely recognized. Upon examining past studies, it was revealed that there has been a lack of research on harnessing the waste energy from double-stage gas turbines powered by biomass-hydrogen hybrid fuel for polygeneration applications. Thus, a new configuration is proposed in the study for the multi-production of electricity, cooling, heating, and potable water. In the current research, a high-pressure turbine is driven by a combustion chamber fed by a biomass gasifier. Meanwhile, a low-pressure turbine is driven by a post-combustion chamber fed by hydrogen as fuel. The heat loss of the topping gas turbine cycle is recuperated by a supercritical Brayton cycle (SBC), a steam Rankine cycle (SRC), and a water heater. The waste heat of the supercritical Brayton cycle and steam Rankine cycle is recovered through an absorption refrigeration cycle and a thermoelectric generator, respectively. Thus, the heat loss of the topping system is completely recovered. The net power output of the gas turbine cycle is considered the electricity production of the system while the output power of the SBC and SRC is utilized in a reverse osmosis desalination system to produce potable water. The investigations conducted on the system are thermodynamic and exergy-economic assessments and three-objective optimization utilizing 5 gases (i.e., CO2, CO, Nitrogen, Air, and Helium) in the SBC. The final results reveal the superiority of Helium as the supercritical gas, bringing about an exergy efficiency (ηex) of 32.11 %, a total cost rate (C˙tot) of 103 $h−1, a payback period (PP) of 0.159 years, and a specific cost of polygeneration (cpoly) of 22.03 $GJ−1 for the system. Although the levelized cost of products of the configuration is high due to the freshwater production, ηex of the proposed system is higher than the previous systems based on a double-stage gas turbine cycle driven by biomass and hydrogen.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Shulong & Huang, Xuechen & Zhang, Jinfeng & Gao, Chao & Wan, Qian & Feng, Dulong, 2024. "Multi-criteria optimization next to a comparative analysis of a polygeneration layout based on a double-stage gas turbine cycle fueled by biomass and hydrogen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:237:y:2024:i:pb:s0960148124017373
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.121669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124017373
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:237:y:2024:i:pb:s0960148124017373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.