IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v237y2024ipbs0960148124017373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria optimization next to a comparative analysis of a polygeneration layout based on a double-stage gas turbine cycle fueled by biomass and hydrogen

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Shulong
  • Huang, Xuechen
  • Zhang, Jinfeng
  • Gao, Chao
  • Wan, Qian
  • Feng, Dulong

Abstract

The significance and advantages of utilizing renewable energy sources are widely recognized. Upon examining past studies, it was revealed that there has been a lack of research on harnessing the waste energy from double-stage gas turbines powered by biomass-hydrogen hybrid fuel for polygeneration applications. Thus, a new configuration is proposed in the study for the multi-production of electricity, cooling, heating, and potable water. In the current research, a high-pressure turbine is driven by a combustion chamber fed by a biomass gasifier. Meanwhile, a low-pressure turbine is driven by a post-combustion chamber fed by hydrogen as fuel. The heat loss of the topping gas turbine cycle is recuperated by a supercritical Brayton cycle (SBC), a steam Rankine cycle (SRC), and a water heater. The waste heat of the supercritical Brayton cycle and steam Rankine cycle is recovered through an absorption refrigeration cycle and a thermoelectric generator, respectively. Thus, the heat loss of the topping system is completely recovered. The net power output of the gas turbine cycle is considered the electricity production of the system while the output power of the SBC and SRC is utilized in a reverse osmosis desalination system to produce potable water. The investigations conducted on the system are thermodynamic and exergy-economic assessments and three-objective optimization utilizing 5 gases (i.e., CO2, CO, Nitrogen, Air, and Helium) in the SBC. The final results reveal the superiority of Helium as the supercritical gas, bringing about an exergy efficiency (ηex) of 32.11 %, a total cost rate (C˙tot) of 103 $h−1, a payback period (PP) of 0.159 years, and a specific cost of polygeneration (cpoly) of 22.03 $GJ−1 for the system. Although the levelized cost of products of the configuration is high due to the freshwater production, ηex of the proposed system is higher than the previous systems based on a double-stage gas turbine cycle driven by biomass and hydrogen.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Shulong & Huang, Xuechen & Zhang, Jinfeng & Gao, Chao & Wan, Qian & Feng, Dulong, 2024. "Multi-criteria optimization next to a comparative analysis of a polygeneration layout based on a double-stage gas turbine cycle fueled by biomass and hydrogen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:237:y:2024:i:pb:s0960148124017373
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.121669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124017373
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khani, Leyla & Mahmoudi, S. Mohammad S. & Chitsaz, Ata & Rosen, Marc A., 2016. "Energy and exergoeconomic evaluation of a new power/cooling cogeneration system based on a solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 64-77.
    2. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    3. Wang, Yurou & Guo, Wenjuan & Chen, Wei & Xu, Gongxun & Zhu, Guoqiang & Xie, Geliang & Xu, Lujiang & Dong, Chengyu & Gao, Shuai & Chen, Yingquan & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Hanping & Fang, Zhen, 2024. "Co-production of porous N-doped biochar and hydrogen-rich gas production from simultaneous pyrolysis-activation-nitrogen doping of biomass: Synergistic mechanism of KOH and NH3," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Habibi, Hamed & Chitsaz, Ata & Javaherdeh, Koroush & Zoghi, Mohammad & Ayazpour, Mojtaba, 2018. "Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of a solar-driven ammonia-water regenerative Rankine cycle and LNG cold energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 147-160.
    5. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    6. Behzadi, Amirmohammad & Gholamian, Ehsan & Houshfar, Ehsan & Habibollahzade, Ali, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of waste heat recovery from Tehran's waste-to-energy plant integrated with an ORC unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1055-1068.
    7. Fu, Yidan & Cai, Lei & Liu, Chunming & Wu, Mouliang & Guan, Yanwen, 2024. "Thermodynamic and economic performance comparison of biomass gasification oxy-fuel combustion power plant in different gasifying atmospheres using advanced exergy and exergoeconomic approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Uusitalo, Antti & Ameli, Alireza & Turunen-Saaresti, Teemu, 2019. "Thermodynamic and turbomachinery design analysis of supercritical Brayton cycles for exhaust gas heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 60-79.
    9. Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Zhang, Jinjun & Irfan, Muhammad & Alvarado, Rafael, 2022. "Analyze the environmental sustainability factors of China: The role of fossil fuel energy and renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 390-402.
    10. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Hussen, Hasanen M. & Anqi, Ali E. & Farouk, Naeim & Issakhov, Alibek, 2022. "Development and tri-objective optimization of a novel biomass to power and hydrogen plant: A comparison of fueling with biomass gasification or biomass digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    11. Mehrabian, M.J. & Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H., 2023. "4E, risk, diagnosis, and availability evaluation for optimal design of a novel biomass-solar-wind driven polygeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    12. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Dincer, Ibrahim & Hamdullahpur, Feridun, 2012. "Energy and exergy analyses of a biomass trigeneration system using an organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 975-985.
    13. Hou, Yongping & Shen, Caoyuan & Hao, Dong & Liu, Yanan & Wang, Hong, 2014. "A dynamic model for hydrogen consumption of fuel cell stacks considering the effects of hydrogen purge operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 672-678.
    14. Flori, Giacomo & Frigo, Stefano & Barontini, Federica & Gabbrielli, Roberto & Sica, Pietro, 2024. "Experimental assessment of oxy-CO2 gasification strategy with woody biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    15. Singh, Mukesh Kumar & Malek, Javed & Sharma, Harish Kumar & Kumar, Rahul, 2024. "Converting the threats of fossil fuel-based energy generation into opportunities for renewable energy development in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    16. Kourougianni, Fanourios & Arsalis, Alexandros & Olympios, Andreas V. & Yiasoumas, Georgios & Konstantinou, Charalampos & Papanastasiou, Panos & Georghiou, George E., 2024. "A comprehensive review of green hydrogen energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Zhou, Zongming & Cao, Yan & Anqi, Ali E. & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed & Rajhi, Ali A. & Alamri, Sagr, 2022. "Converting a geothermal-driven steam flash cycle into a high-performance polygeneration system by waste heat recovery: 3E analysis and Genetic-Fgoalattain optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 609-627.
    18. Al-Rashed, Abdullah A.A.A. & Afrand, Masoud, 2021. "Multi-criteria exergoeconomic optimization for a combined gas turbine-supercritical CO2 plant with compressor intake cooling fueled by biogas from anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    19. V. Srinivasan & Allan Shocker, 1973. "Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(3), pages 337-369, September.
    20. El-Maaroufi, Abdellah & Daoudi, Mohammed & Ahl Laamara, Rachid, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis of a PV/WT/biomass off-grid hybrid power system for rural electrification in northern Morocco using HOMER," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liao, Jixiang & Liu, Xingye & Pang, Yunfeng, 2024. "Economic and technical optimization of a tri-generation setup integrating a partial evaporation Rankine cycle with an ejector-based refrigeration system using different solar collectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Cao, Yan & Habibi, Hamed & Zoghi, Mohammad & Raise, Amir, 2021. "Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine - recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and pa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Wang, Dan & Jasim, Dheyaa J. & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed, 2024. "Optimized multi-criteria performance of a poly-generation layout including a Stirling engine and a supercritical Brayton cycle using biogas and methane as two potential fuels of a topping gas turbine ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    4. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    5. Li, Jiaojiao & Zoghi, Mohammad & Zhao, Linfeng, 2022. "Thermo-economic assessment and optimization of a geothermal-driven tri-generation system for power, cooling, and hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    6. Kim, Sunjin & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2020. "Parametric study and optimization of closed Brayton power cycle considering the charge amount of working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Esmaeil Jadidi & Mohammad Hasan Khoshgoftar Manesh & Mostafa Delpisheh & Viviani Caroline Onishi, 2021. "Advanced Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Analyses of Integrated Solar-Assisted Gasification Cycle for Producing Power and Steam from Heavy Refinery Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Pirmohamadi, Alireza & Ghazi, Mehrangiz & Nikian, Mohammad, 2019. "Optimal design of cogeneration systems in total site using exergy approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1291-1302.
    9. Noorbakhsh, Hosein & Khoshgoftar Manesh, Mohamad Hasan & Amidpour, Majid, 2023. "Evaluation of an innovative polygeneration system based on integration of gasification process with a thermo electric generator- solid oxide fuel cell - Adsorption desalination system - Thermal photov," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    10. Xia, Jiaxi & Wang, Jiangfeng & Lou, Juwei & Hu, Jianjun & Yao, Sen, 2023. "Thermodynamic, economic, environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel combined cooling and power system for cascade utilization of engine waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    11. Yosaf, Salem & Ozcan, Hasan, 2018. "Exergoeconomic investigation of flue gas driven ejector absorption power system integrated with PEM electrolyser for hydrogen generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 88-99.
    12. Hai, Tao & Zoghi, Mohammad & Abed, Hooman & Chauhan, Bhupendra Singh & Ahmed, Ahmed Najat, 2023. "Exergy-economic study and multi-objective optimization of a geothermal-based combined organic flash cycle and PEMFC for poly-generation purpose," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    13. Wang, Zhe & Jiang, Yuemao & Ma, Yue & Han, Fenghui & Ji, Yulong & Cai, Wenjian, 2022. "A partial heating supercritical CO2 nested transcritical CO2 cascade power cycle for marine engine waste heat recovery: Thermodynamic, economic, and footprint analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    14. Wang, Shun-sen & Wu, Chuang & Li, Jun, 2018. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of single-pressure single-stage and multi-stage CO2 transcritical power cycles for engine waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 559-577.
    15. Zhou, Zongming & Cao, Yan & Anqi, Ali E. & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed & Rajhi, Ali A. & Alamri, Sagr, 2022. "Converting a geothermal-driven steam flash cycle into a high-performance polygeneration system by waste heat recovery: 3E analysis and Genetic-Fgoalattain optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 609-627.
    16. Fang, Zhenhua & Pan, Zhen & Ma, Guiyang & Yu, Jingxian & Shang, Liyan & Zhang, Zhien, 2023. "Exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel combined cooling, heating and power system for liquefied natural gas cold energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. García Kerdan, Iván & Raslan, Rokia & Ruyssevelt, Paul & Morillón Gálvez, David, 2017. "ExRET-Opt: An automated exergy/exergoeconomic simulation framework for building energy retrofit analysis and design optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 33-58.
    18. Zhou, Jincheng & Hai, Tao & Ali, Masood Ashraf & Shamseldin, Mohamed A. & Almojil, Sattam Fahad & Almohana, Abdulaziz Ibrahim & Alali, Abdulrhman Fahmi, 2023. "Waste heat recovery of a wind turbine for poly-generation purpose: Feasibility analysis, environmental impact assessment, and parametric optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    19. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Fierro, José J. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Potential savings in the cement industry using waste heat recovery technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    20. Chitgar, Nazanin & Moghimi, Mahdi, 2020. "Design and evaluation of a novel multi-generation system based on SOFC-GT for electricity, fresh water and hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:237:y:2024:i:pb:s0960148124017373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.