IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i24p8409-d701451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advanced Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Analyses of Integrated Solar-Assisted Gasification Cycle for Producing Power and Steam from Heavy Refinery Fuels

Author

Listed:
  • Esmaeil Jadidi

    (Energy, Environmental and Biological Systems Research Lab (EEBRlab), Division of Thermal Sciences and Energy Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology & Engineering, University of Qom, Qom 3716146611, Iran
    Center of Environmental Research, Qom 3716146611, Iran)

  • Mohammad Hasan Khoshgoftar Manesh

    (Energy, Environmental and Biological Systems Research Lab (EEBRlab), Division of Thermal Sciences and Energy Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology & Engineering, University of Qom, Qom 3716146611, Iran
    Center of Environmental Research, Qom 3716146611, Iran)

  • Mostafa Delpisheh

    (Energy, Environmental and Biological Systems Research Lab (EEBRlab), Division of Thermal Sciences and Energy Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology & Engineering, University of Qom, Qom 3716146611, Iran)

  • Viviani Caroline Onishi

    (School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Merchiston Campus, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK)

Abstract

Integrated solar-assisted gasification cycles (ISGC) have emerged as a more flexible and environmentally friendly solution for producing power, steam, and other high-valued by-products from low-cost opportunity fuels. In this light, this paper investigates a new ISGC system for converting heavy refineries fuels into power and steam utilities while enhancing energy efficiency and economic and environmental performance indicators. In this approach, a solar energy field and a two-pressure heat recovery steam generator were integrated into the ISGC system to improve overall economic and environmental plant viability. The ISGC system was modelled in MATLAB software, and the results were validated using Thermoflex software. Conventional and advanced energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental (4E) analyses were implemented to assess the main performance parameters and identify potential system improvements. The ISGC system produced 319.92 MW of power by feeding on 15.5 kg/s of heavy refinery fuel, with a thermal efficiency of 50% and exergy efficiency of 54%. The results also revealed an investment cost of $466 million, evaluated at a system cost rate of 446 $/min and an environmental impact rate of 72,796 pts/min. The conventional and advanced 4E analyses unveiled the process economic and environmental feasibilities, particularly for oil-rich countries with high availability of solar resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Esmaeil Jadidi & Mohammad Hasan Khoshgoftar Manesh & Mostafa Delpisheh & Viviani Caroline Onishi, 2021. "Advanced Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Analyses of Integrated Solar-Assisted Gasification Cycle for Producing Power and Steam from Heavy Refinery Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8409-:d:701451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khani, Leyla & Mahmoudi, S. Mohammad S. & Chitsaz, Ata & Rosen, Marc A., 2016. "Energy and exergoeconomic evaluation of a new power/cooling cogeneration system based on a solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 64-77.
    2. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    3. Athari, Hassan & Soltani, Saeed & Bölükbaşi, Abdurrahim & Rosen, Marc A. & Morosuk, Tatiana, 2015. "Comparative exergoeconomic analyses of the integration of biomass gasification and a gas turbine power plant with and without fogging inlet cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 394-400.
    4. Boyano, A. & Blanco-Marigorta, A.M. & Morosuk, T. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2011. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2202-2214.
    5. Zhang, Guoqiang & Yang, Yongping & Jin, Hongguang & Xu, Gang & Zhang, Kai, 2013. "Proposed combined-cycle power system based on oxygen-blown coal partial gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 735-745.
    6. Jia, Junxi & Abudula, Abuliti & Wei, Liming & Sun, Baozhi & Shi, Yue, 2015. "Thermodynamic modeling of an integrated biomass gasification and solid oxide fuel cell system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 400-410.
    7. Chen, Shiyi & Lior, Noam & Xiang, Wenguo, 2015. "Coal gasification integration with solid oxide fuel cell and chemical looping combustion for high-efficiency power generation with inherent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 298-312.
    8. Perna, Alessandra & Minutillo, Mariagiovanna & Jannelli, Elio, 2016. "Hydrogen from intermittent renewable energy sources as gasification medium in integrated waste gasification combined cycle power plants: A performance comparison," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 457-465.
    9. Ammar Bany Ata & Peter Maximilian Seufert & Christian Heinze & Falah Alobaid & Bernd Epple, 2021. "Optimization of Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plant for Polygeneration of Power and Chemicals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Hassan Athari & Saeed Soltani & Marc A. Rosen & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Tatiana Morosuk, 2015. "Comparative Exergoeconomic Analyses of Gas Turbine Steam Injection Cycles with and without Fogging Inlet Cooling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Yang, Kun & Xu, Zi-Long & Fu, Chao, 2015. "Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated CCHP system with biomass air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 317-327.
    12. Razi, Faran & Dincer, Ibrahim & Gabriel, Kamiel, 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of the integrated copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    13. Domenichini, R. & Gallio, M. & Lazzaretto, A., 2010. "Combined production of hydrogen and power from heavy oil gasification: Pinch analysis, thermodynamic and economic evaluations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2184-2193.
    14. Lv, Xiaojing & Liu, Xing & Gu, Chenghong & Weng, Yiwu, 2016. "Determination of safe operation zone for an intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 91-102.
    15. Kelly, S. & Tsatsaronis, G. & Morosuk, T., 2009. "Advanced exergetic analysis: Approaches for splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 384-391.
    16. Yari, Mortaza & Mehr, Ali Saberi & Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed & Santarelli, Massimo, 2016. "A comparative study of two SOFC based cogeneration systems fed by municipal solid waste by means of either the gasifier or digester," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 586-602.
    17. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    18. Thallam Thattai, A. & Oldenbroek, V. & Schoenmakers, L. & Woudstra, T. & Aravind, P.V., 2016. "Experimental model validation and thermodynamic assessment on high percentage (up to 70%) biomass co-gasification at the 253MWe integrated gasification combined cycle power plant in Buggenum, The Neth," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 381-393.
    19. Zhang, Yixuan & Ahn, Hyungwoong, 2019. "The implications of choice between sour and sweet shift on process design and operation of an IGCC power plant integrated with a dual-stage selexol unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1273-1284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hekmatshoar, Maziyar & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Gholizadeh, Mohammad & Dadpour, Daryoush & Delpisheh, Mostafa, 2022. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a geothermal-driven multi-generation system producing power, freshwater, and hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Mousavi, Seyed Ali & Toopshekan, Ashkan & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Delpisheh, Mostafa, 2023. "Comprehensive exergetic performance assessment and techno-financial optimization of off-grid hybrid renewable configurations with various dispatch strategies and solar tracking systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 40-63.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fallah, M. & Siyahi, H. & Ghiasi, R. Akbarpour & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Rosen, M.A., 2016. "Comparison of different gas turbine cycles and advanced exergy analysis of the most effective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 701-715.
    2. Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M. & Masi, Marco & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2014. "Exergo-environmental analysis of a reverse osmosis desalination plant in Gran Canaria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 223-232.
    3. Wang, Qingqiang & Hou, Jili & Wei, Xing & Jin, Nan & Ma, Yue & Li, Shuyuan & Zhao, Yuchao, 2022. "Advanced exergoenvironmental analysis of the oil shale retorting process with SJ-type rectangular retort," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Wei, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Bingjian & Wu, Shengyuan & Chen, Qinglin & Tsatsaronis, George, 2012. "Energy-use analysis and evaluation of distillation systems through avoidable exergy destruction and investment costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 424-433.
    5. Casas Ledón, Yannay & González, Patricia & Concha, Scarlett & Zaror, Claudio A. & Arteaga-Pérez, Luis E., 2016. "Exergoeconomic valuation of a waste-based integrated combined cycle (WICC) for heat and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 239-252.
    6. Soltanian, Salman & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Farzad, Somayeh & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Mandegari, Mohsen & Görgens, Johann F., 2019. "Exergoeconomic analysis of lactic acid and power cogeneration from sugarcane residues through a biorefinery approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 872-889.
    7. Adrian Bejan & George Tsatsaronis, 2021. "Purpose in Thermodynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Navid, P. & Blanco Marigorta, A.M. & Amidpour, M. & Hamedi, M.H., 2013. "New procedure for optimal design and evaluation of cogeneration system based on advanced exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 314-333.
    9. Sadeghi, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zar, M. & Santarelli, M., 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of a novel syngas fed SOFC power plant using a downdraft gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 16-31.
    10. Fallah, M. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M., 2017. "Advanced exergy analysis for an anode gas recirculation solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1097-1112.
    11. Oyekale, Joseph & Petrollese, Mario & Cau, Giorgio, 2020. "Modified auxiliary exergy costing in advanced exergoeconomic analysis applied to a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    14. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Shayan, E. & Zare, V. & Mirzaee, I., 2019. "On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: A comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1126-1138.
    16. Li, C.Y. & Wu, J.Y. & Shen, Y. & Kan, X. & Dai, Y.J. & Wang, C.-H., 2018. "Evaluation of a combined cooling, heating, and power system based on biomass gasification in different climate zones in the U.S," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 326-340.
    17. Morosuk, T. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2009. "Advanced exergetic evaluation of refrigeration machines using different working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2248-2258.
    18. Tsatsaronis, G. & Morosuk, T., 2010. "Advanced exergetic analysis of a novel system for generating electricity and vaporizing liquefied natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 820-829.
    19. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Ayanoglu, Abdulkadir & Abusoglu, Aysegul, 2011. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4422-4433.
    20. Tan, Luzhi & Dong, Xiaoming & Gong, Zhiqiang & Wang, Mingtao, 2018. "Analysis on energy efficiency and CO2 emission reduction of an SOFC-based energy system served public buildings with large interior zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1106-1118.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8409-:d:701451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.