IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v167y2019icp60-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic and turbomachinery design analysis of supercritical Brayton cycles for exhaust gas heat recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Uusitalo, Antti
  • Ameli, Alireza
  • Turunen-Saaresti, Teemu

Abstract

Significant amount of energy is wasted in engine systems as waste heat. In this study, the use of supercritical Brayton cycles for recovering exhaust gas heat of large-scale engines is investigated. The aim of the study is to investigate the electricity production potential with different operational conditions and working fluids, and to identify the main design parameters affecting the cycle power production. The studied process configurations are the simple recuperated cycle and intercooled recuperated cycle. As the performance of the studied cycle is sensitive on the turbomachinery design and efficiencies, the design of the process turbine and compressor were included in the analysis. Cycles operating with CO2 and ethane resulted in the highest performances in both the simple and intercooled cycle configurations, while the lowest cycle performances were simulated with ethylene and R116. 18.3 MW engine was selected as the case engine and maximum electric power output of 1.76 MW was simulated by using a low compressor inlet temperature, intercooling, and high turbine inlet pressure. It was concluded that working fluid and the cycle operational parameters have significant influence not only on the thermodynamic cycle design, but also highly affects the optimal rotational speed and geometry of the turbomachines.

Suggested Citation

  • Uusitalo, Antti & Ameli, Alireza & Turunen-Saaresti, Teemu, 2019. "Thermodynamic and turbomachinery design analysis of supercritical Brayton cycles for exhaust gas heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 60-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:167:y:2019:i:c:p:60-79
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218321789
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maraver, Daniel & Royo, Javier & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2014. "Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 11-29.
    2. Lai, Ngoc Anh & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2011. "Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 199-211.
    3. Fernández, F.J. & Prieto, M.M. & Suárez, I., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of high-temperature regenerative organic Rankine cycles using siloxanes as working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5239-5249.
    4. Rovira, Antonio & Muñoz-Antón, Javier & Montes, María José & Martínez-Val, José María, 2013. "Optimization of Brayton cycles for low-to-moderate grade thermal energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 403-416.
    5. Kim, Y.M. & Kim, C.G. & Favrat, D., 2012. "Transcritical or supercritical CO2 cycles using both low- and high-temperature heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 402-415.
    6. Larsen, Ulrik & Sigthorsson, Oskar & Haglind, Fredrik, 2014. "A comparison of advanced heat recovery power cycles in a combined cycle for large ships," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 260-268.
    7. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    8. Hong Gao & Chao Liu & Chao He & Xiaoxiao Xu & Shuangying Wu & Yourong Li, 2012. "Performance Analysis and Working Fluid Selection of a Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle for Low Grade Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Schuster, A. & Karellas, S. & Aumann, R., 2010. "Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1033-1039.
    10. Iverson, Brian D. & Conboy, Thomas M. & Pasch, James J. & Kruizenga, Alan M., 2013. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 957-970.
    11. Kang, Seok Hun, 2012. "Design and experimental study of ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and radial turbine using R245fa working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 514-524.
    12. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    13. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Bo & Wang, Shun-sen, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a hybrid cascade supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Xia, Jiaxi & Wang, Jiangfeng & Lou, Juwei & Hu, Jianjun & Yao, Sen, 2023. "Thermodynamic, economic, environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel combined cooling and power system for cascade utilization of engine waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    3. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Wang, Zhe & Jiang, Yuemao & Ma, Yue & Han, Fenghui & Ji, Yulong & Cai, Wenjian, 2022. "A partial heating supercritical CO2 nested transcritical CO2 cascade power cycle for marine engine waste heat recovery: Thermodynamic, economic, and footprint analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    5. Uusitalo, Antti & Turunen-Saaresti, Teemu & Honkatukia, Juha & Tiainen, Jonna & Jaatinen-Värri, Ahti, 2020. "Numerical analysis of working fluids for large scale centrifugal compressor driven cascade heat pumps upgrading waste heat," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Jin, Qinglong & Xia, Shaojun & Chen, Lingen, 2023. "A modified recompression S–CO2 Brayton cycle and its thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    7. Hagen, Brede A.L. & Andresen, Trond & Nekså, Petter, 2022. "Equation-oriented methods for optimizing Rankine cycles using radial inflow turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    8. Edwin Espinel Blanco & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Thermodynamic, Exergy and Environmental Impact Assessment of S-CO 2 Brayton Cycle Coupled with ORC as Bottoming Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Jeong, Yongju & Son, Seongmin & Cho, Seong Kuk & Baik, Seungjoon & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2020. "Evaluation of supercritical CO2 compressor off-design performance prediction methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Kim, Sunjin & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2020. "Parametric study and optimization of closed Brayton power cycle considering the charge amount of working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    11. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Wang, Jingyu & Li, Min & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Adaptive flow assignment for CO2 transcritical power cycle (CTPC): An engine operational profile-based off-design study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    12. Muhammad, Hafiz Ali & Cho, Junhyun & Cho, Jongjae & Choi, Bongsu & Roh, Chulwoo & Ishfaq, Hafiz Ahmad & Lee, Gilbong & Shin, Hyungki & Baik, Young-Jin & Lee, Beomjoon, 2022. "Performance improvement of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle at elevated heat sink temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    13. Uusitalo, Antti & Turunen-Saaresti, Teemu & Grönman, Aki, 2021. "Design and loss analysis of radial turbines for supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Kunniyoor, Vijayaraj & Singh, Punit & Nadella, Karthik, 2020. "Value of closed-cycle gas turbines with design assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    15. Antti Uusitalo & Aki Grönman, 2021. "Analysis of Radial Inflow Turbine Losses Operating with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Chen, Weixiong & Qian, Yiran & Tang, Xin & Fang, Huawei & Yi, Jingwei & Liang, Tiebo & Zhao, Quanbin & Yan, Junjie, 2023. "System-component combined design and comprehensive evaluation of closed-air Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    17. Chagnon-Lessard, Noémie & Copeland, Colin & Mathieu-Potvin, François & Gosselin, Louis, 2020. "Maximizing specific work output extracted from engine exhaust with novel inverted Brayton cycles over a large range of operating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Chengyu & Wang, Huaixin, 2016. "Power cycles for waste heat recovery from medium to high temperature flue gas sources – from a view of thermodynamic optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 707-721.
    2. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    3. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    5. Rovira, Antonio & Muñoz, Marta & Sánchez, Consuelo & Martínez-Val, José María, 2015. "Proposal and study of a balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle for low-to-moderate temperature solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 305-317.
    6. Muñoz, Marta & Rovira, Antonio & Sánchez, Consuelo & Montes, María José, 2017. "Off-design analysis of a Hybrid Rankine-Brayton cycle used as the power block of a solar thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 369-381.
    7. Xu, Jinliang & Yu, Chao, 2014. "Critical temperature criterion for selection of working fluids for subcritical pressure Organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 719-733.
    8. Hui-Xing, Zhai & Wei, Dong & Lin, Shi & Qing-Song, An & Sui-Lin, Wang & Bao-Lin, An, 2022. "Theoretical selection criteria of organic Rankine cycle form for different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    9. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Dynamic modelling and start-up operation of a solar-assisted recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 247-263.
    10. Le, Van Long & Feidt, Michel & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Performance optimization of low-temperature power generation by supercritical ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 513-526.
    11. Uusitalo, Antti & Honkatukia, Juha & Turunen-Saaresti, Teemu, 2017. "Evaluation of a small-scale waste heat recovery organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 146-158.
    12. Markus Preißinger & Dieter Brüggemann, 2017. "Thermoeconomic Evaluation of Modular Organic Rankine Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery over a Broad Range of Heat Source Temperatures and Capacities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Zhai, Huixing & An, Qingsong & Shi, Lin & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 790-805.
    14. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    15. Amini, Ali & Mirkhani, Nima & Pakjesm Pourfard, Pedram & Ashjaee, Mehdi & Khodkar, Mohammad Amin, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of low-grade waste heat recovery in Yazd combined-cycle power plant (Iran) by a CO2 transcritical Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 74-84.
    16. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    17. Ni, Jiaxin & Zhao, Li & Zhang, Zhengtao & Zhang, Ying & Zhang, Jianyuan & Deng, Shuai & Ma, Minglu, 2018. "Dynamic performance investigation of organic Rankine cycle driven by solar energy under cloudy condition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 122-141.
    18. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    19. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    20. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:167:y:2019:i:c:p:60-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.