IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v150y2020icp935-942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selective separation of CH4 and CO2 using membrane contactors

Author

Listed:
  • Hidalgo, D.
  • Sanz-Bedate, S.
  • Martín-Marroquín, J.M.
  • Castro, J.
  • Antolín, G.

Abstract

In this paper, the behavior of micro-porous hollow fiber membrane contactors is analyzed for biogas upgrading under different operational conditions. Physical solvents, as deionized water and sodium chloride solution, were initially used. In these cases, carbon dioxide absorption was dependent upon liquid phase flow. After these experiments, sodium hydroxide was used as chemical absorbent in order to compare results. In this case, an increasing in gas velocity resulted in a higher CO2 mass transfer. This effect was associated to the increase of reactive hydroxide ions available in the solvent. Under optimum conditions, with two membrane contactors operating in series, it was possible to obtain a gas stream with more than 99% of pure methane using deionized water as solvent. The same yields were obtain with NaOH as solvent, but in this case working with just one membrane module, that is, reducing by half the available surface area for molecules diffusion. At constant liquid to gas flow ratios, better separation behavior was targeted at pressures higher than 2.0 barg. When dealing with solvent reuse without regeneration, NaOH is the only absorbent allowing a high number of solvent recirculation cycles. This aspect could be very interesting for the economy of the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Hidalgo, D. & Sanz-Bedate, S. & Martín-Marroquín, J.M. & Castro, J. & Antolín, G., 2020. "Selective separation of CH4 and CO2 using membrane contactors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 935-942.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:150:y:2020:i:c:p:935-942
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148119319457
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ciro Florio & Gabriella Fiorentino & Fabiana Corcelli & Sergio Ulgiati & Stefano Dumontet & Joshua Güsewell & Ludger Eltrop, 2019. "A Life Cycle Assessment of Biomethane Production from Waste Feedstock Through Different Upgrading Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Pelletier, Chloé & Rogaume, Yann & Dieckhoff, Léa & Bardeau, Guillaume & Pons, Marie-Noëlle & Dufour, Anthony, 2019. "Effect of combustion technology and biogenic CO2 impact factor on global warming potential of wood-to-heat chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1381-1388.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R. C. Assunção, Lorena & A. S. Mendes, Pietro & Matos, Stelvia & Borschiver, Suzana, 2021. "Technology roadmap of renewable natural gas: Identifying trends for research and development to improve biogas upgrading technology management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Lee, Jae Won & Kim, Seonggon & Torres Pineda, Israel & Kang, Yong Tae, 2021. "Review of nanoabsorbents for capture enhancement of CO2 and its industrial applications with design criteria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Hidalgo, D. & Martín-Marroquín, J.M., 2020. "Power-to-methane, coupling CO2 capture with fuel production: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Francesco Zito, Pasquale & Brunetti, Adele & Barbieri, Giuseppe, 2022. "Renewable biomethane production from biogas upgrading via membrane separation: Experimental analysis and multistep configuration design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 777-787.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Svetlana Zueva & Andrey A. Kovalev & Yury V. Litti & Nicolò M. Ippolito & Valentina Innocenzi & Ida De Michelis, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Aspects of Biomethane Production from Organic Waste in Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Jakub Stolarski & Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2024. "Economic Analysis of Renewable Energy Generation from a Multi-Energy Installation in a Single-Family House," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Sylwia Myszograj, 2019. "Biogas and Methane Potential of Pre-Thermally Disintegrated Bio-Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Rasheed, Rizwan & Tahir, Fizza & Yasar, Abdullah & Sharif, Faiza & Tabinda, Amtul Bari & Ahmad, Sajid Rashid & Wang, Yubo & Su, Yuehong, 2022. "Environmental life cycle analysis of a modern commercial-scale fibreglass composite-based biogas scrubbing system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1261-1271.
    5. Apoorva Upadhyay & Andrey A. Kovalev & Elena A. Zhuravleva & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Yuriy V. Litti & Shyam Kumar Masakapalli & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2022. "Recent Development in Physical, Chemical, Biological and Hybrid Biogas Upgradation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    6. Bidart, Christian & Wichert, Martin & Kolb, Gunther & Held, Michael, 2022. "Biogas catalytic methanation for biomethane production as fuel in freight transport - A carbon footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Zdravko Pandur & Marin Bačić & Marijan Šušnjar & Matija Landekić & Mario Šporčić & Iva Ištok, 2024. "Energy Gain and Carbon Footprint in the Production of Bioelectricity and Wood Pellets in Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Lombardi, Lidia & Francini, Giovanni, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 440-458.
    9. Zhao, Yunlei & Jin, Bo & Luo, Xiao & Liang, Zhiwu, 2021. "Thermodynamic evaluation and experimental investigation of CaO-assisted Fe-based chemical looping reforming process for syngas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    10. Egidijus Buivydas & Kęstutis Navickas & Kęstutis Venslauskas, 2024. "A Life Cycle Assessment of Methane Slip in Biogas Upgrading Based on Permeable Membrane Technology with Variable Methane Concentration in Raw Biogas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Zadravec, Tomas & Yin, Chungen & Kokalj, Filip & Samec, Niko & Rajh, Boštjan, 2020. "The impacts of different profiles of the grate inlet conditions on freeboard CFD in a waste wood-fired grate boiler," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Robert Bedoić & Goran Smoljanić & Tomislav Pukšec & Lidija Čuček & Davor Ljubas & Neven Duić, 2021. "Geospatial Analysis and Environmental Impact Assessment of a Holistic and Interdisciplinary Approach to the Biogas Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Gabriella Fiorentino & Amalia Zucaro & Antonietta Cerbone & Alessandro Giocoli & Vincenzo Motola & Caterina Rinaldi & Simona Scalbi & Giuliana Ansanelli, 2024. "The Contribution of Biogas to the Electricity Supply Chain: An Italian Life Cycle Assessment Database," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Rufis Fregue Tiegam Tagne & Xiaobin Dong & Solomon G. Anagho & Serena Kaiser & Sergio Ulgiati, 2021. "Technologies, challenges and perspectives of biogas production within an agricultural context. The case of China and Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14799-14826, October.
    15. Kuznetsov, G.V. & Malyshev, D. Yu & Syrodoy, S.V. & Gutareva, N. Yu & Purin, M.V. & Kostoreva, Zh. A., 2022. "Justification of the use of forest waste in the power industry as one of the components OF BIO-coal-water suspension fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    16. Naquash, Ahmad & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Bokhari, Awais & Lim, Hankwon & Lee, Moonyong, 2022. "State-of-the-art assessment of cryogenic technologies for biogas upgrading: Energy, economic, and environmental perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Rafiee, Shahin & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Lindeneg, Susanne & Angelidaki, Irini, 2020. "Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing municipal solid waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, lactic and succinic acid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    18. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    19. Elena Tamburini & Mattias Gaglio & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano, 2020. "Is Bioenergy Truly Sustainable When Land-Use-Change (LUC) Emissions Are Accounted for? The Case-Study of Biogas from Agricultural Biomass in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk, 2020. "GHG Emissions and Efficiency of Energy Generation through Anaerobic Fermentation of Wetland Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:150:y:2020:i:c:p:935-942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.