IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v154y2022ics1364032121010947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State-of-the-art assessment of cryogenic technologies for biogas upgrading: Energy, economic, and environmental perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Naquash, Ahmad
  • Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul
  • Haider, Junaid
  • Bokhari, Awais
  • Lim, Hankwon
  • Lee, Moonyong

Abstract

In this review, conventional biogas upgrading technologies, including physical absorption, chemical absorption, adsorption, and membrane technologies, are evaluated in terms of their production cost, energy consumption, and number of installed plants. Amongst these technologies, cryogenic technology is the most energy- and cost-intensive. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of upgrading technologies and transportation requirements, cryogenic technology can provide dual benefits if integrated with liquefaction, as both require low temperatures for operation. In recent years, various standalone or integrated studies have been conducted to analyze the performance of cryogenic processes based on energy consumption, economic benefits, and operational feasibility for a range of biogas compositions. These studies, which include technical, economic, and environmental analyses, are examined in this review paper. Based on these assessments, cryogenic distillation-based biogas upgrading was found to be economical in terms of energy consumption and product purity. Nevertheless, other emerging cryogenic technologies, such as controlled freeze zone and anti-sublimation, must be explored further from technical and economic perspectives. Furthermore, in this review, technical challenges are discussed and future directions for academic and industrial applications are suggested along with the practical implications of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Naquash, Ahmad & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Bokhari, Awais & Lim, Hankwon & Lee, Moonyong, 2022. "State-of-the-art assessment of cryogenic technologies for biogas upgrading: Energy, economic, and environmental perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:154:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121010947
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121010947
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Ghorbani, Bahram & Manizadeh, Ali, 2020. "Cryogenic biogas upgrading process using solar energy (process integration, development, and energy analysis)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Ciro Florio & Gabriella Fiorentino & Fabiana Corcelli & Sergio Ulgiati & Stefano Dumontet & Joshua Güsewell & Ludger Eltrop, 2019. "A Life Cycle Assessment of Biomethane Production from Waste Feedstock Through Different Upgrading Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Hosseinipour, Sayed Amir & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2019. "Comparison of the biogas upgrading methods as a transportation fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 641-655.
    4. Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Qingling & Deng, Shuai & Li, Hailong & Kitamura, Yutaka, 2019. "Cryogenic-based CO2 capture technologies: State-of-the-art developments and current challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 265-278.
    5. Yousef, Ahmed M. & El-Maghlany, Wael M. & Eldrainy, Yehia A. & Attia, Abdelhamid, 2018. "New approach for biogas purification using cryogenic separation and distillation process for CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 328-351.
    6. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Frigo, S. & Desideri, U. & Pasini, G., 2018. "Small scale bio-LNG plant: Comparison of different biogas upgrading techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 328-335.
    7. Patterson, Tim & Esteves, Sandra & Dinsdale, Richard & Guwy, Alan, 2011. "An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1806-1816, March.
    8. Pellegrini, Laura Annamaria & De Guido, Giorgia & Langé, Stefano, 2018. "Biogas to liquefied biomethane via cryogenic upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 75-83.
    9. Kari-Anne Lyng & Andreas Brekke, 2019. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Biogas as a Fuel for Transport Compared with Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-12, February.
    10. Aziz, Nur Izzah Hamna A. & Hanafiah, Marlia M., 2020. "Life cycle analysis of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 847-857.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yusuf, Noor & Almomani, Fares, 2023. "Recent advances in biogas purifying technologies: Process design and economic considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Zhang, Liugan & Ye, Kai & Wang, Yongzhen & Han, Wei & Xie, Meina & Chen, Longxiang, 2024. "Performance analysis of a hybrid system combining cryogenic separation carbon capture and liquid air energy storage (CS-LAES)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Qi Di & Liang Li & Xiaodan Miao & Linfeng Lan & Xu Yu & Bin Liu & Yuanping Yi & Panče Naumov & Hongyu Zhang, 2022. "Fluorescence-based thermal sensing with elastic organic crystals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Ali Shah, Syed Fahad & Qadeer, Kinza & Naquash, Ahmad & Yasin, Muhammad & Rehan, Mohammad & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Lee, Moonyong & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar, 2022. "Biowaste to bioenergy options for sustainable economic growth opportunities in developing countries: Product space model analysis and policy map development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Wu, Zixi & Wang, Yiqin, 2023. "Consumer finance and consumption upgrading: An empirical study of CHFS," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Apoorva Upadhyay & Andrey A. Kovalev & Elena A. Zhuravleva & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Yuriy V. Litti & Shyam Kumar Masakapalli & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2022. "Recent Development in Physical, Chemical, Biological and Hybrid Biogas Upgradation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    3. Yusuf, Noor & Almomani, Fares, 2023. "Recent advances in biogas purifying technologies: Process design and economic considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Esfandiyar Naeiji & Alireza Noorpoor & Hossein Ghanavati, 2022. "Energy, Exergy, and Economic Analysis of Cryogenic Distillation and Chemical Scrubbing for Biogas Upgrading and Hydrogen Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk, 2020. "GHG Emissions and Efficiency of Energy Generation through Anaerobic Fermentation of Wetland Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Alexander García-Mariaca & Eva Llera-Sastresa, 2021. "Review on Carbon Capture in ICE Driven Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Achinas, Spyridon & Willem Euverink, Gerrit Jan, 2020. "Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Rehman, Ali & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Qadeer, Kinza & Zakir, Fatima & Ding, Yulong & Lee, Moonyong & Wang, Li, 2020. "Integrated biomethane liquefaction using exergy from the discharging end of a liquid air energy storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Izabela Samson-Bręk & Marlena Owczuk & Anna Matuszewska & Krzysztof Biernat, 2022. "Environmental Assessment of the Life Cycle of Electricity Generation from Biogas in Polish Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Lombardi, Lidia & Francini, Giovanni, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 440-458.
    11. R. C. Assunção, Lorena & A. S. Mendes, Pietro & Matos, Stelvia & Borschiver, Suzana, 2021. "Technology roadmap of renewable natural gas: Identifying trends for research and development to improve biogas upgrading technology management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    12. He, Ting & Si, Bin & Gundersen, Truls & Chen, Liqiong & Lin, Wensheng, 2024. "Integrated ethane recovery and cryogenic carbon capture in a dual mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    13. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Qadeer, Kinza & Valentina, Valentina & Khan, Amin & Yasin, Muhammad & Aslam, Muhammad & De Guido, Giorgia & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lee, Moonyong, 2020. "Biogas to liquefied biomethane: Assessment of 3P's–Production, processing, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Eric Santos-Clotas & Alba Cabrera-Codony & Alba Castillo & Maria J. Martín & Manel Poch & Hèctor Monclús, 2019. "Environmental Decision Support System for Biogas Upgrading to Feasible Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Anna Pääkkönen & Kalle Aro & Pami Aalto & Jukka Konttinen & Matti Kojo, 2019. "The Potential of Biomethane in Replacing Fossil Fuels in Heavy Transport—A Case Study on Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Wang, Pengfei & Chen, Yiqi & Teng, Ying & An, Senyou & Li, Yun & Han, Meng & Yuan, Bao & Shen, Suling & Chen, Bin & Han, Songbai & Zhu, Jinlong & Zhu, Jianbo & Zhao, Yusheng & Xie, Heping, 2024. "A comprehensive review of hydrogen purification using a hydrate-based method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    17. Huang, Hong & Fan, Shuanshi & Wang, Yanhong & Lang, Xuemei & Li, Gang, 2023. "Energy and exergy efficiency analysis for biogas De-CO2 with tetra-n-butylammonium bromide hydrates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    18. Scholz, Marco & Melin, Thomas & Wessling, Matthias, 2013. "Transforming biogas into biomethane using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 199-212.
    19. Svetlana Zueva & Andrey A. Kovalev & Yury V. Litti & Nicolò M. Ippolito & Valentina Innocenzi & Ida De Michelis, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Aspects of Biomethane Production from Organic Waste in Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-8, August.
    20. Alivand, Masood S. & Mazaheri, Omid & Wu, Yue & Stevens, Geoffrey W. & Scholes, Colin A. & Mumford, Kathryn A., 2019. "Development of aqueous-based phase change amino acid solvents for energy-efficient CO2 capture: The role of antisolvent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:154:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121010947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.