Author
Listed:
- Jakub Stolarski
(Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland)
- Ewelina Olba-Zięty
(Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland
Centre for Bioeconomy and Renewable Energies, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)
- Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski
(Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland
Centre for Bioeconomy and Renewable Energies, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)
Abstract
The promotion of Renewable Energy Sources RES installations in single-family houses is an element of the broadly understood decarbonisation strategy. Investments in photovoltaic installations and pellet boilers have a direct effect on decreasing CO 2 emissions, thereby contributing to the improvement in air quality and mitigation of climate change, but the question remains of whether they are economically viable. High energy consumption by households results in a significant burden on their budgets. The purpose of this study was to conduct an economic analysis of the renewable electricity (photovoltaic microinstallation—PV) and heat (a pellet boiler) produced in three consecutive years by a single family situated in North-Eastern Poland. The economic analysis was based on the determination of the electricity and heat production costs for renewable energy sources and selected fossil fuels. Profitability metrics such as net present value, internal rate of return and discounted payback period were used for the assessment. For the comparison of electricity costs, the costs of electricity from the power grid were confronted with the costs of electricity generation from a PV microinstallation. For the comparison of heat production costs, the following scenarios were analysed: (i) eco-pea coal vs. pellet, (ii) natural gas vs. pellet and (iii) heating oil vs. pellet. Next, comparisons were made and analysed for multi-energy systems. When comparing the PV microinstallation investment with the variant of using electricity from the power grid, a positive NPV equal to EUR 5959 was obtained for the former, which proved it was profitable. Among the heat generation variants, the lowest total costs were related to eco-pea coal (EUR 29,527), followed by pellet (EUR 33,151) and then natural gas (EUR 39,802), while the highest costs of heat generation were attributed to burning heating oil (EUR 63,445), being nearly twice as high as the cost of burning pellets. This analysis of multi-energy systems showed that the RES system composed of a PV microinstallation for electricity production and a pellet-fired boiler for heat generation was most advantageous because it yielded the lowest total costs (EUR 41,265) among all the analysed variants. A properly selected PV microinstallation and an automatic pellet-fired boiler can make a single-family house economical and provide it with sufficient amounts of renewable electric and heat power throughout the year.
Suggested Citation
Jakub Stolarski & Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2024.
"Economic Analysis of Renewable Energy Generation from a Multi-Energy Installation in a Single-Family House,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-21, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6213-:d:1540188
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6213-:d:1540188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.