IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v251y2024ics0951832024003892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on scenario deduction and emergency decision-making evaluation for construction safety accidents

Author

Listed:
  • She, Jianjun
  • Guo, Zihao
  • Li, Zhijian
  • Liang, Shuwei
  • Zhou, Yilun

Abstract

This study introduces an innovative “scenario-response†analysis framework for emergency management in construction safety accidents. Leveraging Bayesian Network (BN) technology, this framework systematically analyzes and evaluates the potential risks and developmental paths of such accidents. In-depth dissection of construction safety accident cases led to the creation of a comprehensive scenario knowledge meta-representation model. This model effectively captures both the micro-mechanisms and the macro-evolution of accidents. Furthermore, the study employs the entropy weight-TOPSIS model to scientifically evaluate emergency decision-making plans. This approach has resulted in the establishment of a comprehensive accident emergency response evaluation indicator system. It provides a quantitative basis for decision-making, aiding those managing construction safety accidents. The study’s empirical segment, focusing on a case analysis of a deep foundation pit collapse accident, illustrates key preventive measures. It highlights that timely reporting by supervisory personnel, enhanced supervision, and strict punishment of violations are crucial in preventing and controlling accident development in deep foundation pit construction. Additionally, the study validates the practical effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method. It offers valuable insights and guidance for both safety management practices and theoretical research within the construction industry.

Suggested Citation

  • She, Jianjun & Guo, Zihao & Li, Zhijian & Liang, Shuwei & Zhou, Yilun, 2024. "Research on scenario deduction and emergency decision-making evaluation for construction safety accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:251:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003892
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024003892
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:251:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.