IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v252y2024ics0951832024005544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-earthquake functional state assessment of communication base station using Bayesian network

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Fan
  • Zhai, Changhai
  • Qin, Hao

Abstract

The reliability and resilience of communication base stations are critical to the post-earthquake performance of the communication system, and consequently influence the communication, rescue, and emergence management after an earthquake. There is a lack of models that can fully evaluate the post-earthquake functional states of base stations with the consideration of the dependencies between different components. This paper proposes a Bayesian network method to evaluate the post-earthquake functionality of communication base stations. The method considers the dependence between the equipment and its hosting building structure, and the impact of power outages. This model produces seismic functional fragility curves for typical base stations that enable both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of base station functionality. The model is validated using seismic damage data from the Ludian Earthquake. It was found that the proposed model can reasonably predict the post-earthquake functional failure of base stations, in good agreement with the observed seismic damage data. The application of this model provides support for the operation and maintenance of communication base stations, and insights for managing seismic risk and resilience of the communication system.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Fan & Zhai, Changhai & Qin, Hao, 2024. "Post-earthquake functional state assessment of communication base station using Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:252:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024005544
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024005544
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:252:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024005544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.