IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v203y2020ics0951832020305883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-parametric simulation of non-stationary non-gaussian 3D random field samples directly from sparse measurements using signal decomposition and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Tengyuan
  • Wang, Yu

Abstract

With the ever-growing computational power of personal computers over the past few decades, stochastic simulation of spatially varying three-dimensional (3D) quantities has been coupled with numerical analysis models (e.g., 3D finite element model) to consider explicitly the influence of spatial variability of engineering quantities when carrying out design or analysis for mechanical systems and civil- or geo-structures. Random field theory is often adopted in stochastic simulations, where random field samples (RFSs) are generated for representing the spatially varying engineering quantities encountered in practice. Nevertheless, simulation of 3D RFSs is not trivial, especially when measurements are sparse and limited, a case often encountered in engineering practice of a specific project. This is because random field parameters (e.g., the type of auto-correlation structure, correlation length, marginal probability distribution) are difficult to determine when measurements from a project are sparse and limited. The problem becomes more challenging when the quantity of interest is non-stationary and/or non-Gaussian. This renders a great challenge for proper simulation of non-stationary non-Gaussian 3D RFSs from sparse measurements. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a method which integrates the concept of signal decomposition in digital signal processing with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation. The proposed method is non-parametric and data-driven. It takes sparse measurements and their corresponding 3D spatial coordinates as input and returns many high-resolution non-stationary non-Gaussian 3D RFSs as output. The method is illustrated using a series of numerical examples. The results show that the proposed method performs reasonably well.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Tengyuan & Wang, Yu, 2020. "Non-parametric simulation of non-stationary non-gaussian 3D random field samples directly from sparse measurements using signal decomposition and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:203:y:2020:i:c:s0951832020305883
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832020305883
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Jun & Wang, Ding, 2019. "Structural reliability analysis based on polynomial chaos, Voronoi cells and dimension reduction technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 329-340.
    2. Li, Dian-Qing & Tang, Xiao-Song & Phoon, Kok-Kwang, 2015. "Bootstrap method for characterizing the effect of uncertainty in shear strength parameters on slope reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 99-106.
    3. Zhang, Yi & Gomes, António Topa & Beer, Michael & Neumann, Ingo & Nackenhorst, Udo & Kim, Chul-Woo, 2019. "Reliability analysis with consideration of asymmetrically dependent variables: Discussion and application to geotechnical examples," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 261-277.
    4. Jongejan, R.B. & Diermanse, F. & Kanning, W. & Bottema, M., 2020. "Reliability-based partial factors for flood defenses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Pérez, C.J. & Martín, J. & Rufo, M.J., 2006. "Sensitivity estimations for Bayesian inference models solved by MCMC methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1310-1314.
    6. Hanea, Anca & Morales Napoles, Oswaldo & Ababei, Dan, 2015. "Non-parametric Bayesian networks: Improving theory and reviewing applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 265-284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Ruijing & Dai, Hongzhe, 2022. "A non-Gaussian stochastic model from limited observations using polynomial chaos and fractional moments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Zhang, Yagang & Zhao, Yunpeng & Shen, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Jinghui, 2022. "A comprehensive wind speed prediction system based on Monte Carlo and artificial intelligence algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    3. He, Jingran & Gao, Ruofan & Chen, Jianbing, 2022. "A sparse data-driven stochastic damage model for seismic reliability assessment of reinforced concrete structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Li, Yang & Xu, Jun, 2024. "Neural network-aided simulation of non-Gaussian stochastic processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Li, Peiping & Wang, Yu, 2022. "An active learning reliability analysis method using adaptive Bayesian compressive sensing and Monte Carlo simulation (ABCS-MCS)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Ruijing & Dai, Hongzhe, 2022. "A non-Gaussian stochastic model from limited observations using polynomial chaos and fractional moments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Rajabzadeh, Vida & Hekmatzadeh, Ali Akbar & Tabatabaie Shourijeh, Piltan & Torabi Haghighi, Ali, 2023. "Introducing a probabilistic framework to measure dam overtopping risk for dams benefiting from dual spillways," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Liu, Fuchao & Wei, Pengfei & Tang, Chenghu & Wang, Pan & Yue, Zhufeng, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis for multivariate outputs based on multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 287-298.
    4. Daniel Puig & Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles & Fatemeh Bakhtiari & Gissela Landa, 2017. "The accountability imperative for quantifiying the uncertainty of emission forecasts : evidence from Mexico," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03389325, HAL.
    5. Luo, Changqi & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Keshtegar, Behrooz & Niu, Xiaopeng & Taylan, Osman, 2023. "An enhanced uniform simulation approach coupled with SVR for efficient structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Ozkut, Murat, 2020. "Optimization problems for a parallel system with multiple types of dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. Marhavilas, P.K. & Koulouriotis, D.E., 2012. "A combined usage of stochastic and quantitative risk assessment methods in the worksites: Application on an electric power provider," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 36-46.
    8. Li, Peiping & Wang, Yu, 2022. "An active learning reliability analysis method using adaptive Bayesian compressive sensing and Monte Carlo simulation (ABCS-MCS)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    9. Lan, Meng & Zhu, Jiping & Lo, Siuming, 2021. "Hybrid Bayesian network-based landslide risk assessment method for modeling risk for industrial facilities subjected to landslides," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Alibeikloo, Mehrnaz & Khabbaz, Hadi & Fatahi, Behzad, 2022. "Random Field Reliability Analysis for Time-Dependent Behaviour of Soft Soils Considering Spatial Variability of Elastic Visco-Plastic Parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    11. Murat Ozkut, 2022. "Comparison of the replacement policy in k-out-of-n systems having dependent components," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 125-137, February.
    12. Rongen, G. & Morales-Nápoles, O. & Kok, M., 2022. "Expert judgment-based reliability analysis of the Dutch flood defense system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    13. Saraygord Afshari, Sajad & Enayatollahi, Fatemeh & Xu, Xiangyang & Liang, Xihui, 2022. "Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Werner, Christoph & Bedford, Tim & Cooke, Roger M. & Hanea, Anca M. & Morales-Nápoles, Oswaldo, 2017. "Expert judgement for dependence in probabilistic modelling: A systematic literature review and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 801-819.
    15. Ramadhani, Adhitya & Khan, Faisal & Colbourne, Bruce & Ahmed, Salim & Taleb-Berrouane, Mohammed, 2022. "Resilience assessment of offshore structures subjected to ice load considering complex dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    16. Teixeira, Rui & Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz & Nogal, Maria & O’Connor, Alan, 2021. "Reliability analysis using a multi-metamodel complement-basis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    17. Zwirglmaier, Kilian & Straub, Daniel, 2016. "A discretization procedure for rare events in Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 96-109.
    18. Hong, Xu & Wan, Zhiqiang & Chen, Jianbing, 2023. "Parallel assessment of the tropical cyclone wind hazard at multiple locations using the probability density evolution method integrated with the change of probability measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    19. Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan & Dumrak, Jantanee, 2021. "Aleatory uncertainty quantification of project resources and its application to project scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    20. Daniel Puig & Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles & Fatemeh Bakhtiari & Gissela Landa, 2017. "The accountability imperative for quantifiying the uncertainty of emission forecasts : evidence from Mexico," Working Papers hal-03389325, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:203:y:2020:i:c:s0951832020305883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.