IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v188y2019icp483-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic artificial neural network-based reliability considering operational context of assets

Author

Listed:
  • Izquierdo, J.
  • Crespo Márquez, A.
  • Uribetxebarria, J.

Abstract

Assets reliability is a key issue to consider in the maintenance management policy and given its importance several estimation methods and models have been proposed within the reliability engineering discipline. However, these models involve certain assumptions which are the source of different uncertainties inherent to the estimations. An important source of uncertainty is the operational context in which the assets operate and how it affects the different failures. Therefore, this paper contributes to the reduction of the uncertainty coming from the operational context with the proposal of a novel method and its validation through a case study. The proposed model specifically addresses changes in the operational context by implementing dynamic capabilities in a new conception of the Proportional Hazards Model. It also allows to model interactions among working environment variables as well as hidden phenomena thanks to the integration within the model of artificial neural network methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Izquierdo, J. & Crespo Márquez, A. & Uribetxebarria, J., 2019. "Dynamic artificial neural network-based reliability considering operational context of assets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 483-493.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:p:483-493
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018311906
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng, Weiwen & Li, Yan-Feng & Mi, Jinhua & Yu, Le & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability of complex systems under dynamic conditions: A Bayesian multivariate degradation perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 75-87.
    2. Xiang, Anny & Lapuerta, Pablo & Ryutov, Alex & Buckley, Jonathan & Azen, Stanley, 2000. "Comparison of the performance of neural network methods and Cox regression for censored survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 243-257, August.
    3. Louit, D.M. & Pascual, R. & Jardine, A.K.S., 2009. "A practical procedure for the selection of time-to-failure models based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1618-1628.
    4. Nannapaneni, Saideep & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2016. "Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 9-20.
    5. Shortridge, Julie & Aven, Terje & Guikema, Seth, 2017. "Risk assessment under deep uncertainty: A methodological comparison," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 12-23.
    6. Peyman Mazidi & Lina Bertling Tjernberg & Miguel A Sanz Bobi, 2017. "Wind turbine prognostics and maintenance management based on a hybrid approach of neural networks and a proportional hazards model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(2), pages 121-129, April.
    7. Fink, Olga & Zio, Enrico & Weidmann, Ulrich, 2014. "Predicting component reliability and level of degradation with complex-valued neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 198-206.
    8. Naseri, Masoud & Baraldi, Piero & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Availability assessment of oil and gas processing plants operating under dynamic Arctic weather conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 66-82.
    9. Erguido, A. & Crespo Márquez, A. & Castellano, E. & Gómez Fernández, J.F., 2017. "A dynamic opportunistic maintenance model to maximize energy-based availability while reducing the life cycle cost of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 843-856.
    10. Okaro, Ikenna Anthony & Tao, Longbin, 2016. "Reliability analysis and optimisation of subsea compression system facing operational covariate stresses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 159-174.
    11. Barabadi, Abbas & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2011. "Maintainability analysis considering time-dependent and time-independent covariates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 210-217.
    12. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    13. Chiacchio, F. & D’Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Compagno, L., 2016. "Stochastic hybrid automaton model of a multi-state system with aging: Reliability assessment and design consequences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Santhosh, T.V. & Gopika, V. & Ghosh, A.K. & Fernandes, B.G., 2018. "An approach for reliability prediction of instrumentation & control cables by artificial neural networks and Weibull theory for probabilistic safety assessment of NPPs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 31-44.
    15. Marugán, Alberto Pliego & Márquez, Fausto Pedro García & Perez, Jesus María Pinar & Ruiz-Hernández, Diego, 2018. "A survey of artificial neural network in wind energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1822-1836.
    16. Zhu, Wenjin & Fouladirad, Mitra & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2016. "A multi-level maintenance policy for a multi-component and multifailure mode system with two independent failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 50-63.
    17. Yao, Wen & Chen, Xiaoqian & Huang, Yiyong & van Tooren, Michel, 2013. "An enhanced unified uncertainty analysis approach based on first order reliability method with single-level optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 28-37.
    18. Chrianna I Bharat & Kevin Murray & Edward Cripps & Melinda R Hodkiewicz, 2018. "Methods for displaying and calibration of Cox proportional hazards models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(1), pages 105-115, February.
    19. Peyman Mazidi & Mian Du & Lina Bertling Tjernberg & Miguel A Sanz Bobi, 2017. "A health condition model for wind turbine monitoring through neural networks and proportional hazard models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 481-494, October.
    20. Barabadi, Abbas & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2014. "Application of reliability models with covariates in spare part prediction and optimization – A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tohme, Tony & Vanslette, Kevin & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2023. "Reliable neural networks for regression uncertainty estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Luo, Chunling & Shen, Lijuan & Xu, Ancha, 2022. "Modelling and estimation of system reliability under dynamic operating environments and lifetime ordering constraints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    3. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    4. Ni, Pinghe & Li, Jun & Hao, Hong & Yan, Weimin & Du, Xiuli & Zhou, Hongyuan, 2020. "Reliability analysis and design optimization of nonlinear structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Juan Izquierdo & Adolfo Crespo Márquez & Jone Uribetxebarria & Asier Erguido, 2019. "Framework for Managing Maintenance of Wind Farms Based on a Clustering Approach and Dynamic Opportunistic Maintenance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Alice Consilvio & José Solís-Hernández & Noemi Jiménez-Redondo & Paolo Sanetti & Federico Papa & Iñigo Mingolarra-Garaizar, 2020. "On Applying Machine Learning and Simulative Approaches to Railway Asset Management: The Earthworks and Track Circuits Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Urmeneta, Jon & Izquierdo, Juan & Leturiondo, Urko, 2023. "A methodology for performance assessment at system level—Identification of operating regimes and anomaly detection in wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 281-292.
    8. Chiachío, Manuel & Saleh, Ali & Naybour, Susannah & Chiachío, Juan & Andrews, John, 2022. "Reduction of Petri net maintenance modeling complexity via Approximate Bayesian Computation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    9. Saleh, Ali & Chiachío, Manuel & Salas, Juan Fernández & Kolios, Athanasios, 2023. "Self-adaptive optimized maintenance of offshore wind turbines by intelligent Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Rizzo, Fabio & Pistol, Aleksander & Caracoglia, Luca, 2024. "Estimating nonlinear wind-induced response of roof cable nets by aeroelastic experiments and ML modeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    11. Martínez-Galán Fernández, Pablo & Guillén López, Antonio J. & Márquez, Adolfo Crespo & Gomez Fernández, Juan Fco. & Marcos, Jose Antonio, 2022. "Dynamic Risk Assessment for CBM-based adaptation of maintenance planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Hu, Wei & Yang, Zhaojun & Chen, Chuanhai & Wu, Yue & Xie, Qunya, 2021. "A Weibull-based recurrent regression model for repairable systems considering double effects of operation and maintenance: A case study of machine tools," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    2. Rajkumar Bhimgonda Patil & Basavraj S Kothavale & Laxman Yadu Waghmode, 2019. "Selection of time-to-failure model for computerized numerical control turning center based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 105-117, April.
    3. Rezgar Zaki & Abbas Barabadi & Javad Barabady & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou, 2022. "Observed and unobserved heterogeneity in failure data analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 194-207, February.
    4. Ali N Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi & Yonas Z Ayele, 2018. "Production performance analysis during operation phase: A case study," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 559-575, December.
    5. Rocchetta, Roberto & Crespo, Luis G., 2021. "A scenario optimization approach to reliability-based and risk-based design: Soft-constrained modulation of failure probability bounds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Juan Izquierdo & Adolfo Crespo Márquez & Jone Uribetxebarria & Asier Erguido, 2019. "Framework for Managing Maintenance of Wind Farms Based on a Clustering Approach and Dynamic Opportunistic Maintenance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Braglia, Marcello & Carmignani, Gionata & Frosolini, Marco & Zammori, Francesco, 2012. "Data classification and MTBF prediction with a multivariate analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 27-35.
    8. Eichhorn Colombo, Konrad W., 2023. "Financial resilience analysis of floating production, storage and offloading plant operated in Norwegian Arctic region: Case study using inter-/transdisciplinary system dynamics modeling and simulatio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    9. Barabadi, Abbas & Tobias Gudmestad, Ove & Barabady, Javad, 2015. "RAMS data collection under Arctic conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 92-99.
    10. Mostafa Aliyari & Yonas Z Ayele & Abbas Barabadi & Enrique Lopez Droguett, 2019. "Risk analysis in low-voltage distribution systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 118-138, April.
    11. Naseri, Masoud & Baraldi, Piero & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Availability assessment of oil and gas processing plants operating under dynamic Arctic weather conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 66-82.
    12. Masoud Naseri & Javad Barabady, 2016. "On RAM performance of production facilities operating under the Barents Sea harsh environmental conditions," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(3), pages 273-298, September.
    13. Okaro, Ikenna Anthony & Tao, Longbin, 2016. "Reliability analysis and optimisation of subsea compression system facing operational covariate stresses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 159-174.
    14. Barabadi, A. & Ayele, Y.Z., 2018. "Post-disaster infrastructure recovery: Prediction of recovery rate using historical data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 209-223.
    15. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    16. Marwa Belhaj Salem & Mitra Fouladirad & Estelle Deloux, 2021. "Prognostic and Classification of Dynamic Degradation in a Mechanical System Using Variance Gamma Process," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-25, January.
    17. Martínez-Galán Fernández, Pablo & Guillén López, Antonio J. & Márquez, Adolfo Crespo & Gomez Fernández, Juan Fco. & Marcos, Jose Antonio, 2022. "Dynamic Risk Assessment for CBM-based adaptation of maintenance planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    18. Cui, L.X. & Du, Yi-Mu & Sun, C.P., 2023. "On system reliability for time-varying structure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    19. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    20. Dong, Zhe & Li, Bowen & Li, Junyi & Huang, Xiaojin & Zhang, Zuoyi, 2022. "Online reliability assessment of energy systems based on a high-order extended-state-observer with application to nuclear reactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:p:483-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.