IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v232y2018i6p559-575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production performance analysis during operation phase: A case study

Author

Listed:
  • Ali N Qarahasanlou
  • Abbas Barabadi
  • Yonas Z Ayele

Abstract

Production performance analysis plays a significant role in supporting the decision-making process, for managers and engineers dealing with the challenges of the optimization procedure of a system delivery capacity. Operational conditions can influence the production performance of a system drastically, in a short or long term, by affecting the system configuration, reliability, maintainability, maintenance supportability, and functional capacity of its components. Moreover, these impacts can lead to increased business risks and uncertainties. Such a situation demands the successful application of tools and methodologies to minimize the total business risk through an accurate prediction of production performance, addressing the effects of operational conditions. However, there is a lack of practical methodologies, for production performance analysis of systems operating under the time-dependent operational conditions. Hence, the central thrust of this article is to develop a systematic methodology, for the production performance analysis of a system considering the time-dependent operational conditions. In the case study, the results show that the production performance of mining equipment is affected significantly by the operational conditions. These changes occur across the working shifts and due to any changes in the production plan of the mine. The result of the analyses shows that the critical items in the mine is the loader. Hence, in order to increase the production performance of the system, the optimization of the reliability or maintainability of the loader needs to be considered as a priority. Moreover, the wagon drill has a significant excess capacity, which means that, by adding more trucks to the system, the production performance of the system can be improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali N Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi & Yonas Z Ayele, 2018. "Production performance analysis during operation phase: A case study," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 559-575, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:6:p:559-575
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17744383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17744383
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X17744383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barabady, Javad & Kumar, Uday, 2008. "Reliability analysis of mining equipment: A case study of a crushing plant at Jajarm Bauxite Mine in Iran," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 647-653.
    2. Louit, D.M. & Pascual, R. & Jardine, A.K.S., 2009. "A practical procedure for the selection of time-to-failure models based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1618-1628.
    3. Aven, Terje & Pedersen, Linda Martens, 2014. "On how to understand and present the uncertainties in production assurance analyses, with a case study related to a subsea production system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 165-170.
    4. Naseri, Masoud & Baraldi, Piero & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Availability assessment of oil and gas processing plants operating under dynamic Arctic weather conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 66-82.
    5. Garmabaki, A.H.S. & Ahmadi, Alireza & Block, Jan & Pham, Hoang & Kumar, Uday, 2016. "A reliability decision framework for multiple repairable units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 78-88.
    6. Barabadi, Abbas & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2011. "Maintainability analysis considering time-dependent and time-independent covariates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 210-217.
    7. Barabadi, Abbas & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2011. "A methodology for throughput capacity analysis of a production facility considering environment condition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1637-1646.
    8. Hjorteland, A. & Aven, T. & Østebø, R., 2007. "Uncertainty treatment in production assurance analyses throughout the various phases of a project," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(10), pages 1315-1320.
    9. Gao, Xueli & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2010. "An approach for prediction of petroleum production facility performance considering Arctic influence factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 837-846.
    10. Barabadi, Abbas & Tobias Gudmestad, Ove & Barabady, Javad, 2015. "RAMS data collection under Arctic conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 92-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rezgar Zaki & Abbas Barabadi & Javad Barabady & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou, 2022. "Observed and unobserved heterogeneity in failure data analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 194-207, February.
    2. Masoud Naseri & Javad Barabady, 2016. "On RAM performance of production facilities operating under the Barents Sea harsh environmental conditions," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(3), pages 273-298, September.
    3. Barabadi, A. & Ayele, Y.Z., 2018. "Post-disaster infrastructure recovery: Prediction of recovery rate using historical data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 209-223.
    4. Ali Nouri Gharahasanlou & Mohammad Ataei & Reza Khalokakaie & Abbas Barabadi & Vahid Einian, 2017. "Risk based maintenance strategy: a quantitative approach based on time-to-failure model," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(3), pages 602-611, September.
    5. Amin Moniri-Morad & Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad & Hamid Aghababaei & Javad Sattarvand, 2019. "Reliability-based covariate analysis for complex systems in heterogeneous environment: Case study of mining equipment," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 593-604, August.
    6. Barabadi, Abbas & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2014. "Application of reliability models with covariates in spare part prediction and optimization – A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-7.
    7. Eichhorn Colombo, Konrad W., 2023. "Financial resilience analysis of floating production, storage and offloading plant operated in Norwegian Arctic region: Case study using inter-/transdisciplinary system dynamics modeling and simulatio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    8. Barabadi, Abbas & Tobias Gudmestad, Ove & Barabady, Javad, 2015. "RAMS data collection under Arctic conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 92-99.
    9. Naseri, Masoud & Baraldi, Piero & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Availability assessment of oil and gas processing plants operating under dynamic Arctic weather conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 66-82.
    10. Rezgar Zaki & Abbas Barabadi & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & A. H. S. Garmabaki, 2019. "A mixture frailty model for maintainability analysis of mechanical components: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(6), pages 1646-1653, December.
    11. Izquierdo, J. & Crespo Márquez, A. & Uribetxebarria, J., 2019. "Dynamic artificial neural network-based reliability considering operational context of assets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 483-493.
    12. Rajkumar Bhimgonda Patil & Basavraj S Kothavale & Laxman Yadu Waghmode, 2019. "Selection of time-to-failure model for computerized numerical control turning center based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 105-117, April.
    13. Braglia, Marcello & Carmignani, Gionata & Frosolini, Marco & Zammori, Francesco, 2012. "Data classification and MTBF prediction with a multivariate analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 27-35.
    14. Mostafa Aliyari & Yonas Z Ayele & Abbas Barabadi & Enrique Lopez Droguett, 2019. "Risk analysis in low-voltage distribution systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 118-138, April.
    15. Hamzeh Soltanali & A.H.S Garmabaki & Adithya Thaduri & Aditya Parida & Uday Kumar & Abbas Rohani, 2019. "Sustainable production process: An application of reliability, availability, and maintainability methodologies in automotive manufacturing," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 682-697, August.
    16. Reza Barabadi & Mohammad Ataei & Reza Khalokakaie & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou, 2021. "Spare-part management in a heterogeneous environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Slimacek, Vaclav & Lindqvist, Bo Henry, 2017. "Nonhomogeneous Poisson process with nonparametric frailty and covariates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 75-83.
    18. Barabadi, Abbas & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2011. "A methodology for throughput capacity analysis of a production facility considering environment condition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1637-1646.
    19. Okaro, Ikenna Anthony & Tao, Longbin, 2016. "Reliability analysis and optimisation of subsea compression system facing operational covariate stresses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 159-174.
    20. Luo, Xu & Ge, Zhexue & Zhang, ShiGang & Yang, Yongmin, 2021. "A method for the maintainability evaluation at design stage using maintainability design attributes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:6:p:559-575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.