IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v131y2014icp53-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety distance between underground natural gas and water pipeline facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Mohsin, R.
  • Majid, Z.A.
  • Yusof, M.Z.

Abstract

A leaking water pipe bursting high pressure water jet in the soil will create slurry erosion which will eventually erode the adjacent natural gas pipe, thus causing its failure. The standard 300mm safety distance used to place natural gas pipe away from water pipeline facilities needs to be reviewed to consider accidental damage and provide safety cushion to the natural gas pipe. This paper presents a study on underground natural gas pipeline safety distance via experimental and numerical approaches. The pressure–distance characteristic curve obtained from this experimental study showed that the pressure was inversely proportional to the square of the separation distance. Experimental testing using water-to-water pipeline system environment was used to represent the worst case environment, and could be used as a guide to estimate appropriate safety distance. Dynamic pressures obtained from the experimental measurement and simulation prediction mutually agreed along the high-pressure water jetting path. From the experimental and simulation exercises, zero effect distance for water-to-water medium was obtained at an estimated horizontal distance at a minimum of 1500mm, while for the water-to-sand medium, the distance was estimated at a minimum of 1200mm.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohsin, R. & Majid, Z.A. & Yusof, M.Z., 2014. "Safety distance between underground natural gas and water pipeline facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 53-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:131:y:2014:i:c:p:53-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832014001306
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maes, M.A. & Dann, M. & Salama, M.M., 2008. "Influence of grade on the reliability of corroding pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 447-455.
    2. Zhao, Yang & Xihong, Li & Jianbo, Lai, 2007. "Analysis on the diffusion hazards of dynamic leakage of gas pipeline," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 47-53.
    3. Brito, A.J. & de Almeida, A.T., 2009. "Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 187-198.
    4. Yazdani Damavandi, Maziar & Kiaei, Iman & Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohamad Kazem & Seifi, Hossein, 2011. "New approach to gas network modeling in unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6243-6250.
    5. Gerbec, Marko, 2010. "A reliability analysis of a natural-gas pressure-regulating installation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1154-1163.
    6. Lilly, M.T. & Ihekwoaba, S.C. & Ogaji, S.O.T. & Probert, S.D., 2007. "Prolonging the lives of buried crude-oil and natural-gas pipelines by cathodic protection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(9), pages 958-970, September.
    7. Rimkevicius, Sigitas & Kaliatka, Algirdas & Valincius, Mindaugas & Dundulis, Gintautas & Janulionis, Remigijus & Grybenas, Albertas & Zutautaite, Inga, 2012. "Development of approach for reliability assessment of pipeline network systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 22-33.
    8. Oliver-Solà, Jordi & Gabarrell, Xavier & Rieradevall, Joan, 2009. "Environmental impacts of natural gas distribution networks within urban neighborhoods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(10), pages 1915-1924, October.
    9. Yang, Zhao & Xiong, Zhuang & Shao, Min, 2010. "A new method of leak location for the natural gas pipeline based on wavelet analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3814-3820.
    10. Brkic, Dejan, 2009. "An improvement of Hardy Cross method applied on looped spatial natural gas distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1290-1300, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Medeiros, C.P. & Alencar, M.H. & de Almeida, A.T., 2017. "Multidimensional risk evaluation of natural gas pipelines based on a multicriteria decision model using visualization tools and statistical tests for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 268-276.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ValinÄ ius, Mindaugas & ŽutautaitÄ—, Inga & Dundulis, Gintautas & RimkeviÄ ius, Sigitas & Janulionis, Remigijus & Bakas, Rimantas, 2015. "Integrated assessment of failure probability of the district heating network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 314-322.
    2. He, Guoxi & Li, Yansong & Huang, Yuanjie & Sun, Liying & Liao, Kexi, 2019. "A framework of smart pipeline system and its application on multiproduct pipeline leakage handling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Dundulis, Gintautas & ŽutautaitÄ—, Inga & Janulionis, Remigijus & UÅ¡puras, Eugenijus & RimkeviÄ ius, Sigitas & Eid, Mohamed, 2016. "Integrated failure probability estimation based on structural integrity analysis and failure data: Natural gas pipeline case," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 195-202.
    4. Mahdi Abravani & Hassan Saghi, 2017. "Introducing a Novel Flexible Conjunction System to Pressure Control in Water Distribution Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(13), pages 4323-4338, October.
    5. Zhang, Xiaolei & Hu, Longhua & Delichatsios, Michael A. & Zhang, Jianping, 2019. "Experimental study on flame morphologic characteristics of wall attached non-premixed buoyancy driven turbulent flames," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    6. Vadim Fetisov & Aleksey V. Shalygin & Svetlana A. Modestova & Vladimir K. Tyan & Changjin Shao, 2022. "Development of a Numerical Method for Calculating a Gas Supply System during a Period of Change in Thermal Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Rogerson, Ellen C. & Lambert, James H., 2012. "Prioritizing risks via several expert perspectives with application to runway safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 22-34.
    8. Xuejie Li & Yuan Xue & Yuxing Li & Qingshan Feng, 2022. "An Optimization Method for a Compressor Standby Scheme Based on Reliability Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Jan Vysocký & Ladislav Foltyn & Dejan Brkić & Renáta Praksová & Pavel Praks, 2022. "Steady-State Analysis of Electrical Networks in Pandapower Software: Computational Performances of Newton–Raphson, Newton–Raphson with Iwamoto Multiplier, and Gauss–Seidel Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, February.
    10. Marlow, David R. & Beale, David J. & Mashford, John S., 2012. "Risk-based prioritization and its application to inspection of valves in the water sector," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 67-74.
    11. Jan Abrell and Hannes Weigt, 2016. "Investments in a Combined Energy Network Model: Substitution between Natural Gas and Electricity?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    12. Askari, S. & Montazerin, N. & Zarandi, M.H. Fazel, 2015. "Forecasting semi-dynamic response of natural gas networks to nodal gas consumptions using genetic fuzzy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 252-266.
    13. Badami, Marco & Fonti, Antonio & Carpignano, Andrea & Grosso, Daniele, 2018. "Design of district heating networks through an integrated thermo-fluid dynamics and reliability modelling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 826-838.
    14. Yin, Yuanbo & Yang, Hao & Duan, Pengfei & Li, Luling & Zio, Enrico & Liu, Cuiwei & Li, Yuxing, 2022. "Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    15. Dashti, Reza & Afsharnia, Saeed & Ghasemi, Hassan, 2010. "A new long term load management model for asset governance of electrical distribution systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 3661-3667, December.
    16. Casado, Ramon Swell Gomes Rodrigues & Alencar, Marcelo Hazin & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira, 2022. "Combining a multidimensional risk evaluation with an implicit enumeration algorithm to tackle the portfolio selection problem of a natural gas pipeline," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    17. Scholtens, Bert & Boersen, Arieke, 2011. "Stocks and energy shocks: The impact of energy accidents on stock market value," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1698-1702.
    18. Li, Jiaxi & Wang, Dan & Jia, Hongjie & Lei, Yang & Zhou, Tianshuo & Guo, Ying, 2022. "Mechanism analysis and unified calculation model of exergy flow distribution in regional integrated energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    19. Shan, Xiaofang & Wang, Peng & Lu, Weizhen, 2017. "The reliability and availability evaluation of repairable district heating networks under changeable external conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 686-695.
    20. Chen, Yinuo & Xie, Shuyi & Tian, Zhigang, 2022. "Risk assessment of buried gas pipelines based on improved cloud-variable weight theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:131:y:2014:i:c:p:53-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.