IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v248y2022ics0925527322000470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minding Braess Paradox amid third-party logistics hub capacity expansion triggered by demand surge

Author

Listed:
  • Ashraf, Muhammad Hasan
  • Chen, Yuwen
  • Yalcin, Mehmet G.

Abstract

Third-party logistics (3PL) in the U.S. has been declared essential by the government and 3PL firms are tasked to continue their operations amid the pandemic. Meanwhile, demand for e-commerce deliveries have exploded due to strict enforcement of lockdowns and the public's preference to avoid physical contacts. To process the record increase in volume, 3PL firms have expanded capacities of their consolidation hubs. However, expansion in a hub capacity might risk delay propagation through the hub's conveyer systems and lead to a counterintuitive phenomenon known as Braess Paradox (BP). We present two layouts (Two-Way Secondary Sort and Direct Sorting) that are commonly employed in the 3PL hubs to accommodate high volumes. We then extend by differentiating 3PL's traffic into Regular and Express packages and include penalty cost in the model. The results show that the BP may occur in 3PL hub settings. However, both layouts are impacted differently. We compare the performances of the two sorting layouts and present value ranges where the benefits of one layout might outweigh the other in hub operations. We also expand the two-tier model by adding an extra tier of package type (i.e., Critical Package) and provide findings that are more generic to any multiple-tier model. Our findings help in identifying the conditions that 3PLs can avoid BP and improve their hub performances with suitable configurations of flow layout.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashraf, Muhammad Hasan & Chen, Yuwen & Yalcin, Mehmet G., 2022. "Minding Braess Paradox amid third-party logistics hub capacity expansion triggered by demand surge," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:248:y:2022:i:c:s0925527322000470
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527322000470
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Penchina, Claude M., 1997. "Braess paradox: Maximum penalty in a minimal critical network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 379-388, September.
    2. Bagloee, Saeed Asadi & Sarvi, Majid & Wallace, Mark, 2016. "Bicycle lane priority: Promoting bicycle as a green mode even in congested urban area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 102-121.
    3. Luis J. Novoa & Ahmad I. Jarrah & David P. Morton, 2018. "Flow Balancing with Uncertain Demand for Automated Package Sorting Centers," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 210-227, January.
    4. Seth Blumsack & Lester B. Lave & Marija Ilic, 2007. "A Quantitative Analysis of the Relationship Between Congestion and Reliability in Electric Power Networks," The Energy Journal, , vol. 28(4), pages 73-100, October.
    5. Wagner, Stephan M. & Sutter, Reto, 2012. "A qualitative investigation of innovation between third-‐party logistics providers and customers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 944-958.
    6. Mei, Qihuang & Li, Jianbin & Ursavas, Evrim & Zhu, Stuart X. & Luo, Xiaomeng, 2021. "Freight transportation planning in platform service supply chain considering carbon emissions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Alam, Shahriar Tanvir & Ahmed, Sayem & Ali, Syed Mithun & Sarker, Sudipa & Kabir, Golam & ul-Islam, Asif, 2021. "Challenges to COVID-19 vaccine supply chain: Implications for sustainable development goals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    8. Wei-Hua Lin & Hong K. Lo, 2009. "Investigating Braess' Paradox with Time-Dependent Queues," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 117-126, February.
    9. Laguir, Issam & Stekelorum, Rébecca & El Baz, Jamal, 2021. "Proactive environmental strategy and performances of third party logistics providers (TPLs): Investigating the role of eco-control systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    10. Zhao, Chunxue & Fu, Baibai & Wang, Tianming, 2014. "Braess paradox and robustness of traffic networks under stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 135-141.
    11. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H., 1998. "A capacity paradox in network design and how to avoid it," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 539-545, September.
    12. Di, Xuan & He, Xiaozheng & Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2014. "Braess paradox under the boundedly rational user equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 86-108.
    13. Pas, Eric I. & Principio, Shari L., 1997. "Braess' paradox: Some new insights," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 265-276, June.
    14. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Fedtke, Stefan & Schmickerath, Marcel, 2019. "Automated sortation conveyors: A survey from an operational research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 796-815.
    15. Zhang, Jiayuan & Yalcin, Mehmet G. & Hales, Douglas N., 2021. "Elements of paradoxes in supply chain management literature: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giovanni Zenezini & Anna Corinna Cagliano & Giulio Mangano & Carlo Rafele, 2023. "Impacts of COVID-19 on Logistics Service Providers’ Operations: An Italian Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Baishakhi Ganguly & Bikash Koli Dey & Sarla Pareek & Biswajit Sarkar, 2023. "Cost-Effective Imperfect Production-Inventory System under Variable Production Rate and Remanufacturing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Basim S. O. Alsaedi, 2024. "A Sustainable Supply Chain Model with Variable Production Rate and Remanufacturing for Imperfect Production Inventory System under Learning in Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-49, September.
    4. Vlachos, Ilias & Singh, Rajesh Kumar, 2023. "Triad structure impact on the triad resources-firm performance relationship: Theory and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao, Jia & Cheng, Ziyi & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of the traffic paradoxes (1968–2022)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Wang, Wei (Walker) & Wang, David Z.W. & Zhang, Fangni & Sun, Huijun & Zhang, Wenyi & Wu, Jianjun, 2017. "Overcoming the Downs-Thomson Paradox by transit subsidy policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 126-147.
    3. Yao, Jia & Huang, Wenhua & Chen, Anthony & Cheng, Zhanhong & An, Shi & Xu, Guangming, 2019. "Paradox links can improve system efficiency: An illustration in traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 35-49.
    4. Zhaolin Cheng & Laijun Zhao & Huiyong Li, 2020. "A Transportation Network Paradox: Consideration of Travel Time and Health Damage due to Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Yao, Jia & Chen, Anthony, 2014. "An analysis of logit and weibit route choices in stochastic assignment paradox," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 31-49.
    6. (Walker) Wang, Wei & Wang, David Z.W. & Sun, Huijun & Feng, Zengzhe & Wu, Jianjun, 2016. "Braess Paradox of traffic networks with mixed equilibrium behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 95-114.
    7. Shanjiang Zhu & David Levinson & Henry Liu, 2017. "Measuring winners and losers from the new I-35W Mississippi River Bridge," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 905-918, September.
    8. Bagloee, Saeed Asadi & (Avi) Ceder, Avishai & Sarvi, Majid & Asadi, Mohsen, 2019. "Is it time to go for no-car zone policies? Braess Paradox Detection," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 251-264.
    9. Di, Xuan & He, Xiaozheng & Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2014. "Braess paradox under the boundedly rational user equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 86-108.
    10. Romilly, Peter, 2004. "Welfare evaluation with a road capacity constraint," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 287-303, May.
    11. Xiaoning Zhang & H. Zhang, 2010. "Simultaneous Departure Time/Route Choices in Queuing Networks and a Novel Paradox," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 93-112, March.
    12. Rapoport, Amnon & Kugler, Tamar & Dugar, Subhasish & Gisches, Eyran J., 2009. "Choice of routes in congested traffic networks: Experimental tests of the Braess Paradox," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 538-571, March.
    13. Khir, Reem & Erera, Alan & Toriello, Alejandro, 2023. "Robust planning of sorting operations in express delivery systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 615-631.
    14. Morgan, John & Orzen, Henrik & Sefton, Martin, 2009. "Network architecture and traffic flows: Experiments on the Pigou-Knight-Downs and Braess Paradoxes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 348-372, May.
    15. Takashi Akamatsu & Benjamin Heydecker, 2003. "Detecting Dynamic Traffic Assignment Capacity Paradoxes in Saturated Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 123-138, May.
    16. Rossi, Riccardo & Gastaldi, Massimiliano & Carturan, Federico & Pellegrino, Carlo & Modena, Claudio, 2012. "Planning and management of actions on transportation system to address extraordinary events in post-emergency situations. A multidisciplinary approach," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 51, pages 1-3.
    17. Wei-Hua Lin & Hong K. Lo, 2009. "Investigating Braess' Paradox with Time-Dependent Queues," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 117-126, February.
    18. Rapoport, Amnon & Mak, Vincent & Zwick, Rami, 2006. "Navigating congested networks with variable demand: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 648-666, October.
    19. Sohn, Keemin, 2011. "Multi-objective optimization of a road diet network design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 499-511, July.
    20. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H., 1998. "A capacity paradox in network design and how to avoid it," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 539-545, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:248:y:2022:i:c:s0925527322000470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.