IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v232y2021ics0925527320302838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elements of paradoxes in supply chain management literature: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jiayuan
  • Yalcin, Mehmet G.
  • Hales, Douglas N.

Abstract

This study reports the results of a systematic literature review investigating paradoxes in supply chain management. This issue is important because supply chain practitioners frequently face paradoxes in industry with little direction provided in supply chain literature. Investigating the years 1997 through 2019, we identified 64 articles as the basis of our research containing a total of 68 unique paradoxes. In identifying the paradox elements (PEs), we adopted paradox theory (PT) as the base theoretical approach, which was utilized in only 7 of the articles. We employed contingency theory, institutional complexity theory, and complexity theory to support our findings. For each paradox, we also extracted and summarized managerial insights for practitioners. This study addresses the emergent needs of investigating paradoxes in the supply chain management domain to extend the use of PT and complementary theories that can aid practitioners in how to efficiently manage the paradoxes they encounter in industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jiayuan & Yalcin, Mehmet G. & Hales, Douglas N., 2021. "Elements of paradoxes in supply chain management literature: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:232:y:2021:i:c:s0925527320302838
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527320302838
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glock, C. H. & Grosse, E. H. & Ries, J. M., 2017. "Decision support models for supplier development: systematic literature review and research agenda," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 88898, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Christoph G. Schmidt & Kai Foerstl & Birte Schaltenbrand, 2017. "The Supply Chain Position Paradox: Green Practices and Firm Performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(1), pages 3-25, January.
    3. Masae, Makusee & Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H., 2020. "Order picker routing in warehouses: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Adlakha, Veena & Kowalski, Krzysztof, 2000. "A note on the procedure MFL for a more-for-less solution in transportation problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 481-483, August.
    5. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2012. "An evolutionary framework for service innovation: Insights of complexity theory for service science," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 813-822.
    6. Carolin Brix-Asala & Anne-Kristin Geisbüsch & Philipp Christopher Sauer & Patrick Schöpflin & Axel Zehendner, 2018. "Sustainability Tensions in Supply Chains: A Case Study of Paradoxes and Their Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    8. Nathalie Fabbe-Costes & Marianne Jahre, 2008. "Supply Chain Integration and Performance - A Review of the Evidence," Post-Print hal-01419288, HAL.
    9. Stefan, Ioana & Bengtsson, Lars, 2017. "Unravelling appropriability mechanisms and openness depth effects on firm performance across stages in the innovation process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 252-260.
    10. Adlakha, Veena & Kowalski, Krzysztof & Vemuganti, R.R. & Lev, Benjamin, 2007. "More-for-less algorithm for fixed-charge transportation problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 116-127, February.
    11. Mellat-Parast, Mahour & Digman, Lester A., 2008. "Learning: The interface of quality management and strategic alliances," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 820-829, August.
    12. Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Ries, Jörg M., 2017. "Reprint of “Decision support models for supplier development: Systematic literature review and research agenda”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 246-260.
    13. Makusee Masae & Christoph H. Glock & Panupong Vichitkunakorn, 2020. "Optimal order picker routing in the chevron warehouse," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 665-687, June.
    14. Xiaoling Yin & Zhe George Zhang, 2019. "On Downs–Thomson paradox in two-tier service systems with a fast pass and revenue-based capacity investment," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(11), pages 1951-1964, November.
    15. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony, 2009. "Sensitivity analysis of the combined travel demand model with applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 909-921, November.
    16. Tyworth, John E., 2018. "A note on lead-time paradoxes and a tale of competing prescriptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 139-150.
    17. Luca Coscieme & Paul Sutton & Lars F. Mortensen & Ida Kubiszewski & Robert Costanza & Katherine Trebeck & Federico M. Pulselli & Biagio F. Giannetti & Lorenzo Fioramonti, 2019. "Overcoming the Myths of Mainstream Economics to Enable a New Wellbeing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Karthik Murali & Michael K. Lim & Nicholas C. Petruzzi, 2015. "Municipal Groundwater Management: Optimal Allocation and Control of a Renewable Natural Resource," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(9), pages 1453-1472, September.
    19. Vincent Mak & Darryl A. Seale & Eyran J. Gisches & Rui Yang & Meng Cheng & Myounghee Moon & Amnon Rapoport, 2018. "The Braess Paradox and Coordination Failure in Directed Networks with Mixed Externalities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(4), pages 717-733, April.
    20. Lee Matthews & Damien Power & Anne Touboulic & Leonardo Marques, 2016. "Building Bridges: Toward Alternative Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(1), pages 82-94, January.
    21. Christina E. Shalley & Lucy L. Gilson, 2017. "Creativity and the Management of Technology: Balancing Creativity and Standardization," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 605-616, April.
    22. Annachiara Longoni & Davide Luzzini & Madeleine Pullman & Martin Habiague, 2019. "Business for Society is Society’s Business: Tension Management in a Migrant Integration Supply Chain," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(4), pages 3-33, October.
    23. Miriam Wilhelm & Jörg Sydow, 2018. "Managing Coopetition in Supplier Networks – A Paradox Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(3), pages 22-41, July.
    24. Mokhtar, Ahmad Rais Mohamad & Genovese, Andrea & Brint, Andrew & Kumar, Niraj, 2019. "Supply chain leadership: A systematic literature review and a research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 255-273.
    25. Ans Kolk, 2012. "Towards a Sustainable Coffee Market: Paradoxes Faced by a Multinational Company," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 79-89, March.
    26. Yasushi Masuda & Seungjin Whang, 2002. "Capacity Management in Decentralized Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(12), pages 1628-1634, December.
    27. Matthias Klumpp, 2016. "To Green or Not to Green: A Political, Economic and Social Analysis for the Past Failure of Green Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-22, May.
    28. Zhao, Chunxue & Fu, Baibai & Wang, Tianming, 2014. "Braess paradox and robustness of traffic networks under stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 135-141.
    29. Boon-itt, Sakun & Wong, Chee Yew & Wong, Christina W.Y., 2017. "Service supply chain management process capabilities: Measurement development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 1-11.
    30. Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Ries, Jörg M., 2017. "Decision support models for supplier development: Systematic literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 798-812.
    31. Adlakha, Veena & Kowalski, Krzysztof, 1998. "A quick sufficient solution to the More-for-Less paradox in the transportation problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 541-547, August.
    32. Chengyong Xiao & Miriam Wilhelm & Taco van der Vaart & Dirk Pieter van Donk, 2019. "Inside the Buying Firm: Exploring Responses to Paradoxical Tensions in Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(1), pages 3-20, January.
    33. Terziovski, Milé & Guerrero, Jose-Luis, 2014. "ISO 9000 quality system certification and its impact on product and process innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 197-207.
    34. Kalchschmidt, Matteo, 2012. "Best practices in demand forecasting: Tests of universalistic, contingency and configurational theories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 782-793.
    35. Tyworth, John E. & Saldanha, John, 2014. "The lead-time reliability paradox and inconsistent value-of-reliability estimates," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 76-85.
    36. Christian F. Durach & Joakim Kembro & Andreas Wieland, 2017. "A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(4), pages 67-85, October.
    37. Chakuu, Sumeer & Masi, Donato & Godsell, Janet, 2019. "Exploring the relationship between mechanisms, actors and instruments in supply chain finance: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 35-53.
    38. Yang, Hai, 1997. "Sensitivity analysis for the elastic-demand network equilibrium problem with applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 55-70, February.
    39. Galit Shmueli & Inbal Yahav, 2018. "The Forest or the Trees? Tackling Simpson's Paradox with Classification Trees," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(4), pages 696-716, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiansong Zhang & Yingying Zhang & Taiwen Feng, 2024. "Impacts of paradox cognition and organizational unlearning on supply chain resilience: a perspective of paradox theory," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1022-1038, September.
    2. Esfahbodi, Ali & Zhang, Yufeng & Liu, Yang & Geng, Duanyang, 2023. "The fallacy of profitable green supply chains: The role of green information systems (GIS) in attenuating the sustainability trade-offs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Canan Kocabasoglu‐Hillmer & Sinéad Roden & Evelyne Vanpoucke & Byung‐Gak Son & Marianne W. Lewis, 2023. "Radical innovations as supply chain disruptions? A paradox between change and stability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(3), pages 3-19, July.
    4. Joanna Alicja Dyczkowska & Norbert Chamier-Gliszczynski & Waldemar Woźniak & Roman Stryjski, 2024. "Management of the Fuel Supply Chain and Energy Security in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Justice Odei Som & Hod Anyigba, 2022. "Examining the Effects of Information Systems Usage and Managerial Commitment on Supply Chain Performance: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Integration," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    6. Dieste, Marcos & Sauer, Philipp C. & Orzes, Guido, 2022. "Organizational tensions in industry 4.0 implementation: A paradox theory approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    7. Carolin Brix‐asala & Stefan Seuring & Philipp C Sauer & Axel Zehendner & Lara Schilling, 2021. "Resolving the base of the pyramid inclusion paradox through supplier development," Post-Print hal-03891218, HAL.
    8. Ashraf, Muhammad Hasan & Chen, Yuwen & Yalcin, Mehmet G., 2022. "Minding Braess Paradox amid third-party logistics hub capacity expansion triggered by demand surge," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    9. Carolin Brix‐Asala & Stefan Seuring & Philipp C. Sauer & Axel Zehendner & Lara Schilling, 2021. "Resolving the base of the pyramid inclusion paradox through supplier development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3208-3227, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Canan Kocabasoglu‐Hillmer & Sinéad Roden & Evelyne Vanpoucke & Byung‐Gak Son & Marianne W. Lewis, 2023. "Radical innovations as supply chain disruptions? A paradox between change and stability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(3), pages 3-19, July.
    2. Carolin Brix‐Asala & Stefan Seuring & Philipp C. Sauer & Axel Zehendner & Lara Schilling, 2021. "Resolving the base of the pyramid inclusion paradox through supplier development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3208-3227, November.
    3. Yao, Jia & Cheng, Ziyi & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of the traffic paradoxes (1968–2022)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    4. Josip Marić & Carlos Galera-Zarco & Marco Opazo-Basáez, 2022. "The emergent role of digital technologies in the context of humanitarian supply chains: a systematic literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1003-1044, December.
    5. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    6. S. Maryam Masoumi & Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, 2019. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Hu, Jing & Hu, Qiying & Xia, Yusen, 2019. "Who should invest in cost reduction in supply chains?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 1-18.
    8. Imre Dobos & Gyöngyi Vörösmarty, 2019. "Evaluating green suppliers: improving supplier performance with DEA in the presence of incomplete data," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(2), pages 483-495, June.
    9. Moshtari, Mohammad & Altay, Nezih & Heikkilä, Jussi & Gonçalves, Paulo, 2021. "Procurement in humanitarian organizations: Body of knowledge and practitioner's challenges," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    10. Golmohammadi, Amirmohsen & Taghavi, Majid & Farivar, Samira & Azad, Nader, 2018. "Three strategies for engaging a buyer in supplier development efforts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-14.
    11. María-José Verdecho & Faustino Alarcón-Valero & David Pérez-Perales & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz & Raúl Rodríguez-Rodríguez, 2021. "A methodology to select suppliers to increase sustainability within supply chains," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1231-1251, December.
    12. Tamás Bányai, 2018. "Real-Time Decision Making in First Mile and Last Mile Logistics: How Smart Scheduling Affects Energy Efficiency of Hyperconnected Supply Chain Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Zhou, Rui & Bhuiyan, Tanveer Hossain & Medal, Hugh R. & Sherwin, Michael D. & Yang, Dong, 2022. "A stochastic programming model with endogenous uncertainty for selecting supplier development programs to proactively mitigate supplier risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Nasr, Walid W. & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2019. "Supplier development in a two-level lot sizing problem with non-conforming items and learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 349-363.
    15. Imranul Hoque & Mohammad B. Rana, 2020. "Buyer–supplier relationships from the perspective of working environment and organisational performance: review and research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 1-50, February.
    16. Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje & David Tappin, 2020. "Managerial perspectives on drivers for and barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation: Evidence from New Zealand," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 592-604, February.
    17. Veronica S Ülgen & Maria Björklund & Niklas Simm & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Inter-Organizational Supply Chain Interaction for Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Juthathip Suraraksa & Kwang Sup Shin, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Factors for Supplier Selection and Monitoring: The Case of the Automotive Industry in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Noorizadeh, Abdollah & Kuosmanen, Timo & Peltokorpi, Antti, 2021. "Effective purchasing reallocation to suppliers: insights from productivity dynamics and real options theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    20. Janina Grabs & Rachael D. Garrett, 2023. "Goal-Based Private Sustainability Governance and Its Paradoxes in the Indonesian Palm Oil Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 467-507, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:232:y:2021:i:c:s0925527320302838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.