IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v45y2011i6p499-511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective optimization of a road diet network design

Author

Listed:
  • Sohn, Keemin

Abstract

The present study focuses on the development of a model for the optimal design of a road diet plan within a transportation network, and is based on rigorous mathematical models. In most metropolitan areas, there is insufficient road space to dedicate a portion exclusively for cyclists without negatively affecting existing motorists. Thus, it is crucial to find an efficient way to implement a road diet plan that both maximizes the utility for cyclists and minimizes the negative effect on motorists. A network design problem (NDP), which is usually used to find the best option for providing extra road capacity, is adapted here to derive the best solution for limiting road capacity. The resultant NDP for a road diet (NDPRD) takes a bi-level form. The upper-level problem of the NDPRD is established as one of multi-objective optimization. The lower-level problem accommodates user equilibrium (UE) trip assignment with fixed and variable mode-shares. For the fixed mode-share model, the upper-level problem minimizes the total travel time of both cyclists and motorists. For the variable mode-share model, the upper-level problem includes minimization of both the automobile travel share and the average travel time per unit distance for motorists who keep using automobiles after the implementation of a road diet. A multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) is mobilized to solve the proposed problem. The results of a case study, based on a test network, guarantee a robust approximate Pareto optimal front. The possibility that the proposed methodology could be adopted in the design of a road diet plan in a real transportation network is confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohn, Keemin, 2011. "Multi-objective optimization of a road diet network design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 499-511, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:45:y:2011:i:6:p:499-511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856411000516
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Penchina, Claude M., 1997. "Braess paradox: Maximum penalty in a minimal critical network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 379-388, September.
    2. T. L. Magnanti & R. T. Wong, 1984. "Network Design and Transportation Planning: Models and Algorithms," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 1-55, February.
    3. Davis, Gary A., 1994. "Exact local solution of the continuous network design problem via stochastic user equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 61-75, February.
    4. Sang Nguyen & Clermont Dupuis, 1984. "An Efficient Method for Computing Traffic Equilibria in Networks with Asymmetric Transportation Costs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 185-202, May.
    5. Konak, Abdullah & Coit, David W. & Smith, Alice E., 2006. "Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(9), pages 992-1007.
    6. Pas, Eric I. & Principio, Shari L., 1997. "Braess' paradox: Some new insights," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 265-276, June.
    7. Chen, Anthony & Subprasom, Kitti, 2007. "Analysis of regulation and policy of private toll roads in a build-operate-transfer scheme under demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 537-558, July.
    8. Terry L. Friesz & Hsun-Jung Cho & Nihal J. Mehta & Roger L. Tobin & G. Anandalingam, 1992. "A Simulated Annealing Approach to the Network Design Problem with Variational Inequality Constraints," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 18-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Honggang & Liu, Zhiyuan & Dong, Yu & Zhou, Hongyue & Liu, Pan & Chen, Jun, 2024. "A novel network equilibrium model integrating urban aerial mobility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. David Eichler & Hillel Bar-Gera & Meir Blachman, 2013. "Vortex-Based Zero-Conflict Design of Urban Road Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 229-254, September.
    3. Shrestha, Jagat K. & Benta, Agostinho & Lopes, Rui B. & Lopes, Nuno, 2014. "A multi-objective analysis of a rural road network problem in the hilly regions of Nepal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 43-53.
    4. C. S. Shui & W. L. Chan, 2019. "Optimization of a Bikeway Network with Selective Nodes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Mohammad A. Aljamal & Derek Voight & Jacob Green & Jianwei Wang & Huthaifa I. Ashqar, 2021. "Evaluation of the Use of a Road Diet Design: An Urban Corridor Case Study in Washington, DC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Vo, Khoa D. & Lam, William H.K. & Chen, Anthony & Shao, Hu, 2020. "A household optimum utility approach for modeling joint activity-travel choices in congested road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 93-125.
    7. Chung, Jin-Hyuk & Bae, Yun Kyung & Kim, Jinhee, 2016. "Optimal sustainable road plans using multi-objective optimization approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 105-113.
    8. Long, Jiancheng & Szeto, W.Y. & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2014. "A bi-objective turning restriction design problem in urban road networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 426-439.
    9. Salcedo-Sanz, S. & Cuadra, L. & Alexandre-Cortizo, E. & Jiménez-Fernández, S. & Portilla-Figueras, A., 2014. "Soft-Computing: An innovative technological solution for urban traffic-related problems in modern cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 236-244.
    10. Yang, Zhao & Zhang, Yuanyuan & Grembek, Offer, 2016. "Combining traffic efficiency and traffic safety in countermeasure selection to improve pedestrian safety at two-way stop controlled intersections," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 286-301.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ukkusuri, Satish V. & Patil, Gopal, 2009. "Multi-period transportation network design under demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 625-642, July.
    2. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Miandoabchi, Elnaz & Szeto, W.Y. & Rashidi, Hannaneh, 2013. "A review of urban transportation network design problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 281-302.
    3. Gallo, Mariano & D'Acierno, Luca & Montella, Bruno, 2010. "A meta-heuristic approach for solving the Urban Network Design Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 144-157, February.
    4. Clark, Stephen D. & Watling, David P., 2006. "Applications of sensitivity analysis for probit stochastic network equilibrium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 894-911, December.
    5. Joseph Y. J. Chow & Amelia C. Regan, 2011. "Real Option Pricing of Network Design Investments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 50-63, February.
    6. Elnaz Miandoabchi & Reza Farahani & W. Szeto, 2012. "Bi-objective bimodal urban road network design using hybrid metaheuristics," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(4), pages 583-621, December.
    7. Hosseininasab, Seyyed-Mohammadreza & Shetab-Boushehri, Seyyed-Nader & Hejazi, Seyed Reza & Karimi, Hadi, 2018. "A multi-objective integrated model for selecting, scheduling, and budgeting road construction projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 262-277.
    8. Rapoport, Amnon & Kugler, Tamar & Dugar, Subhasish & Gisches, Eyran J., 2009. "Choice of routes in congested traffic networks: Experimental tests of the Braess Paradox," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 538-571, March.
    9. Jia Shu & Haiqing Heng, 2016. "The probability of the existence of a feasible flow in a stochastic transportation network," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(6), pages 479-491, September.
    10. Liu, Haoxiang & Wang, David Z.W., 2015. "Global optimization method for network design problem with stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 20-39.
    11. Satish Ukkusuri & S. Waller, 2008. "Linear Programming Models for the User and System Optimal Dynamic Network Design Problem: Formulations, Comparisons and Extensions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 383-406, December.
    12. Luathep, Paramet & Sumalee, Agachai & Lam, William H.K. & Li, Zhi-Chun & Lo, Hong K., 2011. "Global optimization method for mixed transportation network design problem: A mixed-integer linear programming approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 808-827, June.
    13. Elnaz Miandoabchi & Reza Farahani & Wout Dullaert & W. Szeto, 2012. "Hybrid Evolutionary Metaheuristics for Concurrent Multi-Objective Design of Urban Road and Public Transit Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 441-480, September.
    14. Byung Kim & Wonkyu Kim & Byung Song, 2008. "Sequencing and scheduling highway network expansion using a discrete network design model," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(3), pages 621-642, September.
    15. Gao, Ziyou & Sun, Huijun & Shan, Lian Long, 2004. "A continuous equilibrium network design model and algorithm for transit systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 235-250, March.
    16. Yin, Yafeng & Madanat, Samer M. & Lu, Xiao-Yun, 2009. "Robust improvement schemes for road networks under demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 470-479, October.
    17. Meng, Qiang & Yang, Hai, 2002. "Benefit distribution and equity in road network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 19-35, January.
    18. Yao, Jia & Cheng, Ziyi & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of the traffic paradoxes (1968–2022)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    19. Ziyi Zhou & Min Yang & Fei Sun & Zheyuan Wang & Boqing Wang, 2021. "A Continuous Transportation Network Design Problem with the Consideration of Road Congestion Charging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Clark, Stephen D. & Watling, David P., 2002. "Sensitivity analysis of the probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 617-635, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:45:y:2011:i:6:p:499-511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.