IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v37y2003i2p123-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting Dynamic Traffic Assignment Capacity Paradoxes in Saturated Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Takashi Akamatsu

    (Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan)

  • Benjamin Heydecker

    (Centre for Transport Studies, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, England)

Abstract

Creation of a new link or increase in capacity of an existing link can reduce the efficiency of a congested network as measured by the total travel cost. This phenomenon, of which an extreme example is given by Braess paradox, has been examined in conventional studies within the framework of static assignment. For dynamic traffic assignment, which makes account of the effect of congestion through explicit representation of queues, Akamatsu (2000) gave a simple example of the occurrence of this paradox. The present paper extends that result to a more general network. We first present a necessary and sufficient condition for the paradox to occur in a general network in which there is a queue on each link. We then give a graph-theoretic interpretation of the condition, which gives us a convenient method to test whether or not the paradox will occur by performing certain tests on information that describes the network structure. Finally, as an application of this theory, we examine several example networks and queueing patterns where occurrence of this paradox is inevitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Takashi Akamatsu & Benjamin Heydecker, 2003. "Detecting Dynamic Traffic Assignment Capacity Paradoxes in Saturated Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 123-138, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:37:y:2003:i:2:p:123-138
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.37.2.123.15245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.37.2.123.15245
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.37.2.123.15245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick T. Harker, 1988. "Multiple Equilibrium Behaviors on Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 39-46, February.
    2. Carlos F. Daganzo, 1998. "Queue Spillovers in Transportation Networks with a Route Choice," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 3-11, February.
    3. Richard Arnott & André de Palma & Robin Lindsey, 1993. "Properties of Dynamic Traffic Equilibrium Involving Bottlenecks, Including a Paradox and Metering," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 148-160, May.
    4. Pas, Eric I. & Principio, Shari L., 1997. "Braess' paradox: Some new insights," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 265-276, June.
    5. Dafermos, Stella & Nagurney, Anna, 1984. "On some traffic equilibrium theory paradoxes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 101-110, April.
    6. Smith, M. J., 1993. "A new dynamic traffic model and the existence and calculation of dynamic user equilibria on congested capacity-constrained road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 49-63, February.
    7. Kuwahara, Masao & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2001. "Dynamic user optimal assignment with physical queues for a many-to-many OD pattern," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 461-479, June.
    8. Terry L. Friesz & David Bernstein & Tony E. Smith & Roger L. Tobin & B. W. Wie, 1993. "A Variational Inequality Formulation of the Dynamic Network User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 179-191, February.
    9. Fisk, Caroline, 1979. "More paradoxes in the equilibrium assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 305-309, December.
    10. Akamatsu, Takashi, 1996. "Cyclic flows, Markov process and stochastic traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 369-386, October.
    11. Richard Steinberg & Willard I. Zangwill, 1983. "The Prevalence of Braess' Paradox," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 301-318, August.
    12. Takashi Akamatsu, 2001. "An Efficient Algorithm for Dynamic Traffic Equilibrium Assignment with Queues," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 389-404, November.
    13. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H., 1998. "A capacity paradox in network design and how to avoid it," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 539-545, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iryo, Takamasa, 2011. "Multiple equilibria in a dynamic traffic network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 867-879, July.
    2. Iryo, Takamasa & Smith, Michael J., 2018. "On the uniqueness of equilibrated dynamic traffic flow patterns in unidirectional networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 757-773.
    3. Yao, Jia & Cheng, Ziyi & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of the traffic paradoxes (1968–2022)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    4. Wei-Hua Lin & Hong K. Lo, 2009. "Investigating Braess' Paradox with Time-Dependent Queues," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 117-126, February.
    5. Zhao, Chunxue & Fu, Baibai & Wang, Tianming, 2014. "Braess paradox and robustness of traffic networks under stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 135-141.
    6. Di, Xuan & He, Xiaozheng & Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2014. "Braess paradox under the boundedly rational user equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 86-108.
    7. Wada, Kentaro & Satsukawa, Koki & Smith, Mike & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2019. "Network throughput under dynamic user equilibrium: Queue spillback, paradox and traffic control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 391-413.
    8. Koohyun Park, 2011. "Detecting Braess Paradox Based on Stable Dynamics in General Congested Transportation Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 207-232, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shanjiang Zhu & David Levinson & Henry Liu, 2017. "Measuring winners and losers from the new I-35W Mississippi River Bridge," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 905-918, September.
    2. Yao, Jia & Cheng, Ziyi & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of the traffic paradoxes (1968–2022)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    3. Wei-Hua Lin & Hong K. Lo, 2009. "Investigating Braess' Paradox with Time-Dependent Queues," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 117-126, February.
    4. Koohyun Park, 2011. "Detecting Braess Paradox Based on Stable Dynamics in General Congested Transportation Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 207-232, June.
    5. Di, Xuan & He, Xiaozheng & Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2014. "Braess paradox under the boundedly rational user equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 86-108.
    6. Xiaoning Zhang & H. Zhang, 2010. "Simultaneous Departure Time/Route Choices in Queuing Networks and a Novel Paradox," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 93-112, March.
    7. Yao, Jia & Huang, Wenhua & Chen, Anthony & Cheng, Zhanhong & An, Shi & Xu, Guangming, 2019. "Paradox links can improve system efficiency: An illustration in traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 35-49.
    8. Yao, Jia & Chen, Anthony, 2014. "An analysis of logit and weibit route choices in stochastic assignment paradox," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 31-49.
    9. Zhao, Chunxue & Fu, Baibai & Wang, Tianming, 2014. "Braess paradox and robustness of traffic networks under stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 135-141.
    10. Wang, Tao & Liao, Peng & Tang, Tie-Qiao & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2022. "Deterministic capacity drop and morning commute in traffic corridor with tandem bottlenecks: A new manifestation of capacity expansion paradox," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. (Walker) Wang, Wei & Wang, David Z.W. & Sun, Huijun & Feng, Zengzhe & Wu, Jianjun, 2016. "Braess Paradox of traffic networks with mixed equilibrium behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 95-114.
    12. Bittihn, Stefan & Schadschneider, Andreas, 2021. "The effect of modern traffic information on Braess’ paradox," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    13. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony, 2009. "Sensitivity analysis of the combined travel demand model with applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 909-921, November.
    14. Wada, Kentaro & Satsukawa, Koki & Smith, Mike & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2019. "Network throughput under dynamic user equilibrium: Queue spillback, paradox and traffic control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 391-413.
    15. Rapoport, Amnon & Kugler, Tamar & Dugar, Subhasish & Gisches, Eyran J., 2009. "Choice of routes in congested traffic networks: Experimental tests of the Braess Paradox," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 538-571, March.
    16. Zhen Qian & H. Zhang, 2013. "A Hybrid Route Choice Model for Dynamic Traffic Assignment," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 183-203, June.
    17. Pas, Eric I. & Principio, Shari L., 1997. "Braess' paradox: Some new insights," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 265-276, June.
    18. Huang, Hai-Jun & Lam, William H. K., 2002. "Modeling and solving the dynamic user equilibrium route and departure time choice problem in network with queues," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 253-273, March.
    19. Iryo, Takamasa, 2011. "Multiple equilibria in a dynamic traffic network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 867-879, July.
    20. Nie, Yu (Marco), 2010. "Equilibrium analysis of macroscopic traffic oscillations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 62-72, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:37:y:2003:i:2:p:123-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.