IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v208y2019icp369-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective management of performance-based contracts for sustainment dominant systems

Author

Listed:
  • Patra, Pradipta
  • Kumar, U. Dinesh
  • Nowicki, David R.
  • Randall, Wesley S.

Abstract

Performance-based contracting (PBC) is becoming the favoured procurement strategy among suppliers and customers of sustainment dominant systems (SDS) such as aircraft, weapon systems, mining equipment, etc. Under a PBC, supplier profit is linked to how well the SDS meets customer expectations in terms of relevant performance metrics. System availability is a common, contractually agreed upon performance metric that measures customer expectations. In this paper, we analyse performance contracts from the perspective of the supplier, where system availability serves as the performance metric. We develop single-period and multi-period supplier performance models and demonstrate how these models are used to maximise a supplier's profit in the context of a PBC. We provide empirical evidence from a mining and construction equipment industry and demonstrate how PBC overcomes the information asymmetry and moral hazard that is common in SDS principal agent models. Practically, our models can be used to increase the likelihood of success for both the supplier and the customer when they embrace PBC. Our main contributions include establishing the optimal availability that an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) can provide by considering their own probability of loss; analysing the properties of an OEM's future net profit function using first order autoregressive moving average (ARMA) process; and performing marginal analysis and providing bounds for the net profit function for linear and non-linear revenue functions. We derive a relationship between macro-level availability and micro-level parameters such as failure rate, fleet size and base stock levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Patra, Pradipta & Kumar, U. Dinesh & Nowicki, David R. & Randall, Wesley S., 2019. "Effective management of performance-based contracts for sustainment dominant systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 369-382.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:208:y:2019:i:c:p:369-382
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552731830478X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vandermerwe, Sandra & Rada, Juan, 1988. "Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 314-324, December.
    2. Chu, Leon Yang & Sappington, David E.M., 2009. "Procurement contracts: Theory vs. practice," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 51-59, January.
    3. So, Kut C. & Song, Jing-Sheng, 1998. "Price, delivery time guarantees and capacity selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 28-49, November.
    4. Langmaak, Stephan & Wiseall, Stephen & Bru, Christophe & Adkins, Russell & Scanlan, James & Sóbester, András, 2013. "An activity-based-parametric hybrid cost model to estimate the unit cost of a novel gas turbine component," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 74-88.
    5. Öner, K.B. & Kiesmüller, G.P. & van Houtum, G.J., 2010. "Optimization of component reliability in the design phase of capital goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 615-624, September.
    6. Basak, Suleyman & Shapiro, Alexander, 2001. "Value-at-Risk-Based Risk Management: Optimal Policies and Asset Prices," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 371-405.
    7. D Nowicki & U D Kumar & H J Steudel & D Verma, 2008. "Spares provisioning under performance-based logistics contract: profit-centric approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 342-352, March.
    8. Özler, Aysun & Tan, BarIs & Karaesmen, Fikri, 2009. "Multi-product newsvendor problem with value-at-risk considerations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 244-255, February.
    9. Sang-Hyun Kim & Morris A. Cohen & Serguei Netessine, 2007. "Performance Contracting in After-Sales Service Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(12), pages 1843-1858, December.
    10. Stambaugh, Fred, 1996. "Risk and value at risk," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 612-621, December.
    11. Jose A. Guajardo & Morris A. Cohen & Sang-Hyun Kim & Serguei Netessine, 2012. "Impact of Performance-Based Contracting on Product Reliability: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 961-979, May.
    12. Mirzahosseinian, H. & Piplani, R., 2011. "A study of repairable parts inventory system operating under performance-based contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 256-261, October.
    13. Fernando Bernstein & Francis de Véricourt, 2008. "Competition for Procurement Contracts with Service Guarantees," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 562-575, June.
    14. Virolainen, Veli-Matti, 1998. "A survey of procurement strategy development in industrial companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 677-688, September.
    15. T Jin & P Wang, 2012. "Planning performance based contracts considering reliability and uncertain system usage," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 63(10), pages 1467-1478, October.
    16. Craig C. Sherbrooke, 1968. "Metric: A Multi-Echelon Technique for Recoverable Item Control," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 122-141, February.
    17. Kim, Hong Sik & Sohn, So Young, 2009. "Cost of ownership model for the RFID logistics system applicable to u-city," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 406-417, April.
    18. Urban, Timothy L., 2009. "Establishing delivery guarantee policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 959-967, August.
    19. Jin, Tongdan & Tian, Yu, 2012. "Optimizing reliability and service parts logistics for a time-varying installed base," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 152-162.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ming Zhang & Jianjun Zhu & Ponnambalam Kumaraswamy & Hehua Wang, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Effects of Problem Size and the Problem Proposing Mechanism on the Problem Processing Mechanism in a New Main Manufacturer–Supplier Collaborative System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Li, Dong & Mishra, Nishant, 2021. "Engaging suppliers for reliability improvement under outcome-based compensations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Korkeamäki, Lauri & Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit, 2021. "Worth the risk? The profit impact of outcome-based service offerings for manufacturing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 92-102.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Xuwei & Jiang, Zhong-Zhong & Sun, Minghe & Tang, Liang & Liu, Xiaoran, 2021. "Repairable spare parts provisioning for multiregional expanding fleets of equipment under performance-based contracting," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Jin, Tongdan & Tian, Zhigang & Xie, Min, 2015. "A game-theoretical approach for optimizing maintenance, spares and service capacity in performance contracting," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 31-43.
    3. Qin, Xuwei & Shao, Lusheng & Jiang, Zhong-Zhong, 2020. "Contract design for equipment after-sales service with business interruption insurance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 176-187.
    4. Korkeamäki, Lauri & Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit, 2021. "Worth the risk? The profit impact of outcome-based service offerings for manufacturing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 92-102.
    5. Wang, Yulan & Wallace, Stein W. & Shen, Bin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2015. "Service supply chain management: A review of operational models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 685-698.
    6. Ge, Qianru & Peng, Hao & van Houtum, Geert-Jan & Adan, Ivo, 2018. "Reliability optimization for series systems under uncertain component failure rates in the design phase," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 163-175.
    7. Pradipta Patra & U. Dinesh Kumar, 2024. "Availability contracts under hierarchical maintenance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 389-423, September.
    8. Xian Zhao & Jing Zhang & Xiaoyue Wang, 2019. "Joint optimization of components redundancy, spares inventory and repairmen allocation for a standby series system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 623-638, August.
    9. Xie, Wei & Liao, Haitao & Jin, Tongdan, 2014. "Maximizing system availability through joint decision on component redundancy and spares inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 164-176.
    10. Jin, Tongdan & Tian, Yu, 2012. "Optimizing reliability and service parts logistics for a time-varying installed base," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 152-162.
    11. Rahimi-Ghahroodi, S. & Al Hanbali, A. & Zijm, W.H.M. & Timmer, J.B., 2019. "Emergency supply contracts for a service provider with limited local resources," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 445-460.
    12. Mirzahosseinian, H. & Piplani, R., 2011. "A study of repairable parts inventory system operating under performance-based contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 256-261, October.
    13. Qianru Ge & Willem van Jaarsveld & Zümbül Atan, 2020. "Optimal redesign decisions through failure rate estimates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(4), pages 254-271, June.
    14. Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2014. "Integrated spare parts logistics and operations planning for maintenance service providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 44-53.
    15. Jieun Lee & Hyung-Deok Shin & Saehwa Hong, 2021. "Servitization of Global Manufacturing Business," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 565-584, December.
    16. Nitin Bakshi & Sang-Hyun Kim & Nicos Savva, 2015. "Signaling New Product Reliability with After-Sales Service Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1812-1829, August.
    17. Grubic, Tonci & Jennions, Ian, 2018. "Do outcome-based contracts exist? The investigation of power-by-the-hour and similar result-oriented cases," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 209-219.
    18. Nowicki, David R. & Randall, Wesley S. & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2012. "Improving the computational efficiency of metric-based spares algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 324-334.
    19. Godoy, David R. & Pascual, Rodrigo & Knights, Peter, 2014. "A decision-making framework to integrate maintenance contract conditions with critical spares management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 102-108.
    20. Rezapour, Shabnam & Allen, Janet K. & Mistree, Farrokh, 2016. "Reliable flow in forward and after-sales supply chains considering propagated uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 409-436.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:208:y:2019:i:c:p:369-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.