IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v68y2015i11p2322-2329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why does loyalty–cooperation behavior vary over buyer–seller relationship?

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Lei-Yu
  • Chen, Po-Yuan
  • Chen, Kuan-Yang

Abstract

This study argues that a favorable relationship (with trust and commitment) existing between two parties might not necessarily guarantee that subsequent transactions or partnerships can be stabilized. Each party in a relationship is required to conduct specific investments on behalf of the other to prevent discontinued trading or transaction relationships. Hence, this study combines relationship marketing and specific asset investment concepts within the transaction cost theory to investigate the relationship between inter-firm trust and commitment and loyalty and cooperation. By focusing on listed and over-the-counter-traded companies in Taiwan of industries that possess complete supply chains, this study collects 153 effective surveys for empirical analysis. The results show that commitment is more important than trust in a business-to-business (B2B) relationship for increasing the willingness of business customers and/or partners to participate in specific asset investments, thus increasing their loyalty and cooperation in the B2B relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Lei-Yu & Chen, Po-Yuan & Chen, Kuan-Yang, 2015. "Why does loyalty–cooperation behavior vary over buyer–seller relationship?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2322-2329.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:68:y:2015:i:11:p:2322-2329
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296315001654
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geyskens, I., 1998. "Trust, Satisfaction, and Equity in Marketing Channel Relationships," Other publications TiSEM fe002848-4b88-4266-a87b-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Min‐Ping Kang & Joseph T. Mahoney & Danchi Tan, 2009. "Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: the case of OEM suppliers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 117-135, February.
    3. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Laura Onofri, 2008. "Testing Williamson's theory on transaction-specific governance structures: Evidence from electricity markets," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 11, pages 355-372, November.
    5. Wolfgang Ulaga & Andreas Eggert, 2006. "Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business-to-business relationships," Post-Print hal-00482522, HAL.
    6. Helena Yli‐Renko & Erkko Autio & Harry J. Sapienza, 2001. "Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology‐based firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 587-613, June.
    7. Rauyruen, Papassapa & Miller, Kenneth E., 2007. "Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 21-31, January.
    8. Erin Anderson, 1985. "The Salesperson as Outside Agent or Employee: A Transaction Cost Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 234-254.
    9. Kang, Bohyeon & Jindal, Rupinder P., 2015. "Opportunism in buyer–seller relationships: Some unexplored antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 735-742.
    10. John Hagedoorn & Jos Schakenraad, 1994. "The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 291-309, May.
    11. Björn Sven Ivens & Catherine Pardo & Robert Salle & Bernard Cova, 2009. "Relationship keyness : The underlying concept for different forms of key relationship management," Post-Print hal-02311844, HAL.
    12. Cui, Nan & Wen, Na & Xu, Lan & Qin, Yao, 2013. "Contingent effects of managerial guanxi on new product development success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2522-2528.
    13. Miquel-Romero, Maria José & Caplliure-Giner, Eva María & Adame-Sánchez, Consolación, 2014. "Relationship marketing management: Its importance in private label extension," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 667-672.
    14. Heli C. Wang & Jinyu He & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2009. "Firm‐specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: the roles of economic‐ and relationship‐based employee governance mechanisms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(12), pages 1265-1285, December.
    15. Akbar Zaheer & N. Venkatraman, 1995. "Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 373-392.
    16. Jia, Flora Fang & Wang, Jeff Jianfeng, 2013. "Marketing channel relationships in China: A review and integration with an institution-based perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2545-2551.
    17. Shaalan, Ahmed S. & Reast, Jon & Johnson, Debra & Tourky, Marwa E., 2013. "East meets West: Toward a theoretical model linking guanxi and relationship marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2515-2521.
    18. Laura Onofri, 2008. "Testing Williamson's Theory on Transaction-Specific Governance Structures: Evidence from Electricity Markets," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 355-372, November.
    19. Brito, Luiz Artur Ledur & Brito, Eliane Pereira Zamith & Hashiba, Luciana Harumi, 2014. "What type of cooperation with suppliers and customers leads to superior performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 952-959.
    20. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    21. Allen Kaufman & Craig H. Wood & Gregory Theyel, 2000. "Collaboration and technology linkages: a strategic supplier typology," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(6), pages 649-663, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Shin & Jung-Sang Yoo & Ik-Whan G. Kwon, 2020. "Fostering Trust and Commitment in Complex Project Networks through Dedicated Investment in Partnership Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Padgett, Daniel & Hopkins, Christopher D. & Williams, Zac, 2020. "Buyer dependence in B2B relationships: The role of supplier investments, commitment form, and trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 13-24.
    3. Bai, Jingkun & Su, Jiaoyue & Xin, Zihao & Wang, Chengqi, 2024. "Calculative trust, relational trust, and organizational performance: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Torsten Bornemann & Martin Klarmann & Martin Moosbrugger, 2020. "Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Forschung zum organisationalen Einkaufsverhalten: Überblick über die Marketingliteratur [Behavioral B2B Buying Research—An Overview of the Marketing Literature]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 447-478, December.
    5. Nina Shin & Sangwook Park, 2019. "Evidence-Based Resilience Management for Supply Chain Sustainability: An Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, January.
    6. David Gligor & Christopher Newman & Saim Kashmiri, 2021. "Does your skin color matter in buyer–seller negotiations? The implications of being a Black salesperson," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 969-993, September.
    7. Wu, Lei-Yu & Chen, Kuan-Yang & Chen, Po-Yuan & Tung, Pei-Ju, 2016. "Revisiting associations between specific asset investment and loyal and cooperative behavior: A complexity theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3545-3552.
    8. Chen, Kuan-Yang & Huan, Tzung-Cheng, 2022. "Explore how SME family businesses of travel service industry use market knowledge for product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 519-530.
    9. Lyu, Chongchong & Yang, Jianjun & Zhang, Feng & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Mu, Tian, 2020. "How do knowledge characteristics affect firm’s knowledge sharing intention in interfirm cooperation? An empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 48-60.
    10. Chen Qian & Paul A. Dion & Ralf Wagner & Stefan Seuring, 2023. "Efficacy of supply chain relationships – differences in performance appraisals between buyers and suppliers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1302-1320, September.
    11. Chen Qian & Stefan Seuring & Ralf Wagner, 2021. "Reviewing interfirm relationship quality from a supply chain management perspective," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 625-650, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Lei-Yu & Chen, Kuan-Yang & Chen, Po-Yuan & Tung, Pei-Ju, 2016. "Revisiting associations between specific asset investment and loyal and cooperative behavior: A complexity theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3545-3552.
    2. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:21:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619500130 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Jean, Ruey Jer “Bryan” & Kim, Daekwan & Bello, Daniel C., 2017. "Relationship-based product innovations: Evidence from the global supply chain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 127-140.
    4. Artz, Kendall W. & Brush, Thomas H., 2000. "Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 337-362, April.
    5. Liwen Wang, 2023. "The interplay of contracts and trust: untangling between- and within-dyad effects," Post-Print hal-03944358, HAL.
    6. De Vita, Glauco & Tekaya, Arafet & Wang, Catherine L., 2010. "Asset specificity's impact on outsourcing relationship performance: A disaggregated analysis by buyer-supplier asset specificity dimensions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 657-666, July.
    7. Griessmair, Michele & Hussain, Dildar & Windsperger, Josef, 2014. "Trust and the tendency towards multi-unit franchising: A relational governance view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2337-2345.
    8. Chwo-Ming Joseph Yu & Tsai-Ju Liao, 2008. "The impact of governance mechanisms on transaction-specific investments in supplier-manufacturer relationships: A comparison of local and foreign manufacturers," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 95-114, February.
    9. Zhang, Man & Hartley, Janet L., 2018. "Guanxi, IT systems, and innovation capability: The moderating role of proactiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 75-86.
    10. Pfajfar, Gregor & Shoham, Aviv & Małecka, Agnieszka & Zalaznik, Maja, 2022. "Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 46-61.
    11. Jean, Ruey-Jer Bryan & Kim, Daekwan & Chiou, Jyh-She & Calantone, Roger, 2018. "Strategic orientations, joint learning, and innovation generation in international customer-supplier relationships," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 838-851.
    12. Son, Byung-Gak & Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, Canan & Roden, Sinéad, 2016. "A dyadic perspective on retailer–supplier relationships through the lens of social capital," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 120-131.
    13. Xue, Jinjie & Yuan, Hongping & Shi, Benshan, 2016. "Investigating partners' opportunistic behavior in joint ventures in China: The role of transaction costs and relational exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6067-6078.
    14. Wang, Lei & Jiang, Fuming & Li, Jun & Motohashi, Kazuyuki & Zheng, Xiaosong, 2019. "The contingent effects of asset specificity, contract specificity, and trust on offshore relationship performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 338-349.
    15. López-Bayón, Susana & González-Díaz, Manuel, 2010. "Indefinite contract duration: Evidence from electronics subcontracting," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 145-159, June.
    16. Andreas Fürst & Mika Gabrielsson & Peter Gabrielsson & Jana-Kristin Prigge, 2023. "The role of marketing in new ventures: How marketing activities should be organized in firms’ infancy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 966-989, September.
    17. Laura Onofri & Samuele Trestini & Fateh Mamine & Jason Loughrey, 2023. "Understanding agricultural land leasing in Ireland: a transaction cost approach," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Agarwal, Rajshree & Croson, Rachel & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2007. "Decision Making in Strategic Alliances: An Experimental Investigation," Working Papers 07-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    19. Nicholas Paparoidamis & Constantine Katsikeas & Ruben Chumpitaz, 2017. "The role of supplier performance in building customer trust and loyalty: A cross-country examination," Post-Print hal-01745331, HAL.
    20. Plewa, Carolin, 2009. "Exploring organizational culture difference in relationship dyads," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 46-57.
    21. Chen, Chung-Jen & Hsiao, Yung-Chang & Chu, Mo-An, 2014. "Transfer mechanisms and knowledge transfer: The cooperative competency perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2531-2541.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:68:y:2015:i:11:p:2322-2329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.