IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jaitra/v121y2024ics096969972400139x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying civilian aircraft vulnerability: A data-driven approach in geo-political conflict zones for improved risk assessment of aircraft shot-down

Author

Listed:
  • Bukhman, Stanislav
  • Brito, Mario P.
  • Sung, Ming-Chien

Abstract

Current risk analysis methods for quantifying the risk of the shooting down of commercial aircraft rely on the use of risk matrices and risk categorisation classes. We show that these processes are not effective, subject to bias and not adequate to help aviation companies decide whether to fly to or over conflict areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Bukhman, Stanislav & Brito, Mario P. & Sung, Ming-Chien, 2024. "Quantifying civilian aircraft vulnerability: A data-driven approach in geo-political conflict zones for improved risk assessment of aircraft shot-down," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:121:y:2024:i:c:s096969972400139x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096969972400139X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnold Barnett, 2004. "CAPPS II: The Foundation of Aviation Security?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 909-916, August.
    2. Gregory S. Parnell & Christopher M. Smith & Frederick I. Moxley, 2010. "Intelligent Adversary Risk Analysis: A Bioterrorism Risk Management Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 32-48, January.
    3. de Jong,Piet & Heller,Gillian Z., 2008. "Generalized Linear Models for Insurance Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521879149, January.
    4. Javier Cano & Alessandro Pollini & Lorenzo Falciani & Uğur Turhan, 2016. "Modeling current and emerging threats in the airport domain through adversarial risk analysis," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 894-912, August.
    5. Louis Anthony (Tony)Cox, 2008. "What's Wrong with Risk Matrices?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 497-512, April.
    6. Rogério Pereira & Tatiane Almeida de Menezes, 2021. "Does per capita income cause homicide rates? An application of an IV spatial model," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 1388-1400, August.
    7. Matthias Basedau & Birte Pfeiffer & Johannes Vüllers, 2016. "Bad Religion? Religion, Collective Action, and the Onset of Armed Conflict in Developing Countries," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 60(2), pages 226-255, March.
    8. Rios Insua, D. & Alfaro, C. & Gomez, J. & Hernandez-Coronado, P. & Bernal, F., 2018. "A framework for risk management decisions in aviation safety at state level," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 74-82.
    9. Ersin Ancel & Ann T. Shih & Sharon M. Jones & Mary S. Reveley & James T. Luxhøj & Joni K. Evans, 2015. "Predictive safety analytics: inferring aviation accident shaping factors and causation," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 428-451, April.
    10. Sheldon H. Jacobson & Tamana Karnani & John E. Kobza & Lynsey Ritchie, 2006. "A Cost‐Benefit Analysis of Alternative Device Configurations for Aviation‐Checked Baggage Security Screening," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 297-310, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Rios Insua & David Banks & Jesus Rios, 2016. "Modeling Opponents in Adversarial Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 742-755, April.
    2. Vicki Bier, 2020. "The Role of Decision Analysis in Risk Analysis: A Retrospective," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2207-2217, November.
    3. Gilberto Montibeller & L. Alberto Franco & Ashley Carreras, 2020. "A Risk Analysis Framework for Prioritizing and Managing Biosecurity Threats," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(11), pages 2462-2477, November.
    4. Yang Lu, 2019. "Flexible (panel) regression models for bivariate count–continuous data with an insurance application," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(4), pages 1503-1521, October.
    5. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wong, Bernard & Yang, Xinda, 2021. "On the modelling of multivariate counts with Cox processes and dependent shot noise intensities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 9-24.
    6. Chenglong Ye & Lin Zhang & Mingxuan Han & Yanjia Yu & Bingxin Zhao & Yuhong Yang, 2022. "Combining Predictions of Auto Insurance Claims," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Aivars Spilbergs & Andris Fomins & Māris Krastiņš, 2022. "Multivariate Modelling of Motor Third Party Liability Insurance Claims," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 5-18.
    8. Deprez, Laurens & Antonio, Katrien & Boute, Robert, 2021. "Pricing service maintenance contracts using predictive analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 530-545.
    9. Ewa DUDEK & Karolina KRZYKOWSKA-PIOTROWSKA & Mirosław SIERGIEJCZYK, 2020. "Risk Management In (Air) Transport With Exemplary Risk Analysis Based On The Tolerability Matrix," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 15(2), pages 143-156, June.
    10. Martin Branda, 2014. "Optimization Approaches to Multiplicative Tariff of Rates Estimation in Non-Life Insurance," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 31(05), pages 1-17.
    11. Jeonghwan Kim & Woojoo Lee, 2019. "On testing the hidden heterogeneity in negative binomial regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 457-470, May.
    12. Qimeng Pan & Lysa Porth & Hong Li, 2022. "Assessing the Effectiveness of the Actuaries Climate Index for Estimating the Impact of Extreme Weather on Crop Yield and Insurance Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Jiří Valecký, . "Calculation of Solvency Capital Requirements for Non-life Underwriting Risk Using Generalized Linear Models," Prague Economic Papers, University of Economics, Prague, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    14. David J. Ball & Laurence Ball‐King, 2013. "Safety Management and Public Spaces: Restoring Balance," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(5), pages 763-771, May.
    15. Francis Duval & Mathieu Pigeon, 2019. "Individual Loss Reserving Using a Gradient Boosting-Based Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Jiří Valecký, 2017. "Calculation of Solvency Capital Requirements for Non-life Underwriting Risk Using Generalized Linear Models," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 450-466.
    17. Nguyen, Son & Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling & Du, Yuquan & Shi, Wenming, 2019. "A quantitative risk analysis model with integrated deliberative Delphi platform for container shipping operational risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 203-227.
    18. Pinho, Luis Gustavo B. & Nobre, Juvêncio S. & Singer, Julio M., 2015. "Cook’s distance for generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 126-136.
    19. Adriana Dima & Elena Radu & Ecaterina Milica Dobrota & Adrian Otoiu & Alina Florentina Saracu, 2023. "Sustainable Development of E-commerce in the Post-COVID Times: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Pestle Factors," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(S17), pages 1095-1095, November.
    20. Jason R. W. Merrick & Laura A. McLay, 2010. "Is Screening Cargo Containers for Smuggled Nuclear Threats Worthwhile?," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 155-171, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:121:y:2024:i:c:s096969972400139x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-air-transport-management/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.