IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v312y2024ics036054422403247x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy consumption and economic analysis of CO2 capture from flue gas by membrane separation coupled with hydrate method

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Yang
  • Li, Ai-Rong
  • Li, Bin
  • Li, Minchang
  • Yao, Hao
  • Wang, Zhihong

Abstract

Hydrate-based CO2 capture (HBCC), as a new gas separation technique, has been widely studied. CO2 hydrate formation requires a higher pressure and lower temperature. In this study, a novel integrated process using membrane separation coupled with hydrate method was proposed to improve the efficiency of CO2 capture. The CO2 separation process from flue gas was simulated and optimized using Aspen Plus, revealing that the CO2 concentration was increased from 15 % to 42.32 % after membrane separation, and further rose to 87.35 % following Hydrate-based gas separation. The energy consumption for CO2 capture was calculated to be 2.81 GJ/tCO2, with an exergy loss during the hydrate-based separation stage reaching up to 33.26 %. The total cost of CO2 capture, including equipment investment, was determined to be 82.35 $/t, with an estimated payback period of approximately 6 years. Thus, the process using membrane separation coupled with hydrate method was reasonable and feasible through the energy, exergy and economic analysis. This research introduces a promising large-scale industrial CO2 capture process for the advancement of Hydrate-based CO2 capture technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Yang & Li, Ai-Rong & Li, Bin & Li, Minchang & Yao, Hao & Wang, Zhihong, 2024. "Energy consumption and economic analysis of CO2 capture from flue gas by membrane separation coupled with hydrate method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:312:y:2024:i:c:s036054422403247x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422403247X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:312:y:2024:i:c:s036054422403247x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.