IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i23p6315-d453735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Assessment of Different Heat Exchangers for CO 2 Capture

Author

Listed:
  • Solomon Aforkoghene Aromada

    (Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kjølnes Ring 56, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway)

  • Nils Henrik Eldrup

    (Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kjølnes Ring 56, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway
    SINTEF Tel-Tek, SINTEF Industri, Kjølnes Ring 30, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway)

  • Fredrik Normann

    (Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden)

  • Lars Erik Øi

    (Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kjølnes Ring 56, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway)

Abstract

We examined the cost implications of selecting six different types of heat exchangers as the lean/rich heat exchanger in an amine-based CO 2 capture process. The difference in total capital cost between different capture plant scenarios due to the different costs of the heat exchangers used as the lean/rich heat exchanger, in each case, is in millions of Euros. The gasketed-plate heat exchanger (G-PHE) saves significant space, and it saves considerable costs. Selecting the G-PHE instead of the shell and tube heat exchangers (STHXs) will save €33 million–€39 million in total capital cost (CAPEX), depending on the type of STHX. About €43 million and €2 million in total installed costs (CAPEX) can be saved if the G-PHE is selected instead of the finned double-pipe heat exchanger (FDP-HX) or welded-plate heat exchanger, respectively. The savings in total annual cost is also in millions of Euros/year. Capture costs of €5/tCO 2 –€6/tCO 2 can be saved by replacing conventional STHXs with the G-PHE, and over €6/tCO 2 in the case of the FDP-HX. This is significant, and it indicates the importance of clearly stating the exact type and not just the broad classification of heat exchanger used as lean/rich heat exchanger. This is required for cost estimates to be as accurate as possible and allow for appropriate comparisons with other studies. Therefore, the gasketed-plate heat exchanger is recommended to save substantial costs. The CO 2 capture costs of all scenarios are most sensitive to the steam cost. The plate and frame heat exchangers (PHEs) scenario’s capture cost can decline from about €77/tCO 2 to €59/tCO 2 or rise to €95/tCO 2 .

Suggested Citation

  • Solomon Aforkoghene Aromada & Nils Henrik Eldrup & Fredrik Normann & Lars Erik Øi, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Different Heat Exchangers for CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-27, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6315-:d:453735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon Aforkoghene Aromada & Bjørn Kvamme & Na Wei & Navid Saeidi, 2019. "Enthalpies of Hydrate Formation and Dissociation from Residual Thermodynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Li, Kangkang & Leigh, Wardhaugh & Feron, Paul & Yu, Hai & Tade, Moses, 2016. "Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture process: Techno-economic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 648-659.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hrvoje Dorotić & Kristijan Čuljak & Josip Miškić & Tomislav Pukšec & Neven Duić, 2022. "Technical and Economic Assessment of Supermarket and Power Substation Waste Heat Integration into Existing District Heating Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-29, February.
    2. Sebastian Gärtner & Thomas Marx-Schubach & Matthias Gaderer & Gerhard Schmitz & Michael Sterner, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Separation for an Innovative Energy Concept towards Low-Emission Glass Melting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Ma, Chunyan & Wang, Nan & Ye, Nannan & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2021. "CO2 capture using ionic liquid-based hybrid solvents from experiment to process evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Chin-hung & Li, Kangkang & Yu, Hai & Jiang, Kaiqi & Chen, Jian & Feron, Paul, 2018. "Amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture mediated by metal ions: Advancement of CO2 desorption using copper ions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1030-1038.
    2. Xie, Heping & Liu, Tao & Wang, Yufei & Wu, Yifan & Wang, Fuhuan & Tang, Liang & Jiang, Wen & Liang, Bin, 2017. "Enhancement of electricity generation in CO2 mineralization cell by using sodium sulfate as the reaction medium," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 991-999.
    3. Martin Haaf & Peter Ohlemüller & Jochen Ströhle & Bernd Epple, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of alternative fuels in second-generation carbon capture and storage processes," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 149-164, February.
    4. Zhang, Ning & Zhang, Duo & Zuo, Jian & Miller, Travis R. & Duan, Huabo & Schiller, Georg, 2022. "Potential for CO2 mitigation and economic benefits from accelerated carbonation of construction and demolition waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Liu, Fei & Fang, Mengxiang & Dong, Wenfeng & Wang, Tao & Xia, Zhixiang & Wang, Qinhui & Luo, Zhongyang, 2019. "Carbon dioxide absorption in aqueous alkanolamine blends for biphasic solvents screening and evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 468-477.
    7. Tu, Te & Yang, Xing & Cui, Qiufang & Shang, Yu & Yan, Shuiping, 2022. "CO2 regeneration energy requirement of carbon capture process with an enhanced waste heat recovery from stripped gas by advanced transport membrane condenser," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    8. Yi, Qun & Wu, Guo-sheng & Gong, Min-hui & Huang, Yi & Feng, Jie & Hao, Yan-hong & Li, Wen-ying, 2017. "A feasibility study for CO2 recycle assistance with coke oven gas to synthetic natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 149-161.
    9. Oh, Se-Young & Binns, Michael & Cho, Habin & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2016. "Energy minimization of MEA-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 353-362.
    10. Julio, Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano & Castro-Amoedo, Rafael & Maréchal, François & González, Aldemar Martínez & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos, 2023. "Exergy and economic analysis of the trade-off for design of post-combustion CO2 capture plant by chemical absorption with MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    11. Wang, Dandan & Li, Sheng & Liu, Feng & Gao, Lin & Sui, Jun, 2018. "Post combustion CO2 capture in power plant using low temperature steam upgraded by double absorption heat transformer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 603-612.
    12. Xie, Heping & Wu, Yifan & Liu, Tao & Wang, Fuhuan & Chen, Bin & Liang, Bin, 2020. "Low-energy-consumption electrochemical CO2 capture driven by biomimetic phenazine derivatives redox medium," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Xie, Heping & Gao, Xiaolin & Liu, Tao & Chen, Bin & Wu, Yifan & Jiang, Wenchuan, 2020. "Electricity generation by a novel CO2 mineralization cell based on organic proton-coupled electron transfer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    14. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    15. Gunawan, Tubagus Aryandi & Luo, Hongxi & Greig, Chris & Larson, Eric, 2024. "Shared CO₂ capture, transport, and storage for decarbonizing industrial clusters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    16. Zeng, Xingyan & Zhu, Lin & Huang, Yue & Lv, Liping & Zhang, Chaoli & Hao, Qiang & Fan, Junming, 2024. "Combined pinch and exergy analysis for post-combustion carbon capture NGCC integrated with absorption heat transformer and flash evaporator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    17. Wang, Tao & Yu, Wei & Le Moullec, Yann & Liu, Fei & Xiong, Yili & He, Hui & Lu, Jiahui & Hsu, Emily & Fang, Mengxiang & Luo, Zhongyang, 2017. "Solvent regeneration by novel direct non-aqueous gas stripping process for post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 23-32.
    18. Hanak, Dawid P. & Kolios, Athanasios J. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2016. "Comparison of probabilistic performance of calcium looping and chemical solvent scrubbing retrofits for CO2 capture from coal-fired power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 323-336.
    19. Zhang, Weidong & Jin, Xianhang & Tu, Weiwei & Ma, Qian & Mao, Menglin & Cui, Chunhua, 2017. "Development of MEA-based CO2 phase change absorbent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 316-323.
    20. Haider Sultan & Umair Hassan Bhatti & Hafiz Ali Muhammad & Sung Chan Nam & Il Hyun Baek, 2021. "Modification of postcombustion CO2 capture process: A techno‐economic analysis," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 165-182, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6315-:d:453735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.