IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v308y2024ics0360544224023673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle analysis of biowaste-to- biogas/biomethane processes: Cost and environmental assessment of four different biowaste scenarios organic fraction of municipal solid waste and secondary sewage sludge)

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Shuaibing
  • Lin, Haitao
  • Abed, Azher M.
  • Mahariq, Ibrahim
  • Ayed, Hamdi
  • Mouldi, Abir
  • Lin, Zhixiang

Abstract

Biowaste-to-biogas processes have been introduced to design a valuable and green renewable plant to achieve a sustainable society and environment. The biomethane production process through biogas upgrading instead of designing a combined heat and power (CHP) system can be more attractive. This study presents a life cycle analysis (LCA) from both cost and environmental standpoints for four biowaste-to-biogas/biomethane process scenarios. Biogas production is achieved through anaerobic co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OF-MSW) and secondary sewage sludge (S-SS), incorporating a pre-treatment process based on the dark co-fermentation process (DCFP). Each scenario offers distinct methods for utilizing the hydrogen-rich gas and biogas, with varying degrees of energy recovery and efficiency. Two sensitivity studies were conducted under various utilizations of the recovered biomethane and the anticipated electricity mix. Scenario SC-1 (CHP-from-biogas) was found to be the most co-friendly favorable in eight out of eleven impact categories (under the CML/IA technique). Further, biogas upgrading-integrated options exhibited lower impacts. Replacing biomethane instead of petrol in scenarios with upgraded biogas was identified as the most effective approach against climate change. Financial analysis indicated that all layouts are economically viable, each demonstrating a positive NPV over a 20-year period (up to $11.57 million).

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Shuaibing & Lin, Haitao & Abed, Azher M. & Mahariq, Ibrahim & Ayed, Hamdi & Mouldi, Abir & Lin, Zhixiang, 2024. "Life cycle analysis of biowaste-to- biogas/biomethane processes: Cost and environmental assessment of four different biowaste scenarios organic fraction of municipal solid waste and secondary sewage s," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:308:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224023673
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224023673
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ifaei, Pouya & Nazari-Heris, Morteza & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Asadi, Somayeh & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2023. "Sustainable energies and machine learning: An organized review of recent applications and challenges," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Yin, Yongjun & Chen, Shaoxu & Li, Xusheng & Jiang, Bo & Zhao, Joe RuHe & Nong, Guangzai, 2021. "Comparative analysis of different CHP systems using biogas for the cassava starch plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Cavinato, Cristina & Bolzonella, David & Pavan, Paolo & Fatone, Francesco & Cecchi, Franco, 2013. "Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and source sorted biowaste in pilot- and full-scale reactors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 260-265.
    4. Pochwatka, Patrycja & Rozakis, Stelios & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Czekała, Wojciech & Qiao, Wei & Nägele, Hans-Joachim & Janczak, Damian & Mazurkiewicz, Jakub & Mazur, Andrzej & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "The energetic and economic analysis of demand-driven biogas plant investment possibility in dairy farm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Francesco Zito, Pasquale & Brunetti, Adele & Barbieri, Giuseppe, 2022. "Renewable biomethane production from biogas upgrading via membrane separation: Experimental analysis and multistep configuration design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 777-787.
    6. Marconi, Pietro & Rosa, Lorenzo, 2023. "Role of biomethane to offset natural gas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Abd, Ammar Ali & Othman, Mohd Roslee & Majdi, Hasan Sh & Helwani, Zuchra, 2023. "Green route for biomethane and hydrogen production via integration of biogas upgrading using pressure swing adsorption and steam-methane reforming process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 64-78.
    8. Baldi, F. & Pecorini, I. & Iannelli, R., 2019. "Comparison of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and activated sludge for hydrogen and methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1755-1765.
    9. Lombardi, Lidia & Francini, Giovanni, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 440-458.
    10. Ghafoori, Mohammad Samim & Loubar, Khaled & Marin-Gallego, Mylène & Tazerout, Mohand, 2022. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of biomethane production via landfill biogas upgrading and power-to-gas technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    11. Feng, Ye & Chen, Jinglong & Luo, Ji, 2024. "Life cycle cost analysis of power generation from underground coal gasification with carbon capture and storage (CCS) to measure the economic feasibility," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Shi, Tao & Zhou, Jianzhao & Ren, Jingzheng & Ayub, Yousaf & Yu, Haoshui & Shen, Weifeng & Li, Qiao & Yang, Ao, 2023. "Co-valorisation of sewage sludge and poultry litter waste for hydrogen production: Gasification process design, sustainability-oriented optimization, and systematic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    13. Venkatesh, G. & Elmi, Rashid Abdi, 2013. "Economic–environmental analysis of handling biogas from sewage sludge digesters in WWTPs (wastewater treatment plants) for energy recovery: Case study of Bekkelaget WWTP in Oslo (Norway)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 220-235.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Budych-Gorzna, Magdalena & Smoczynski, Marcin & Oleskowicz-Popiel, Piotr, 2016. "Enhancement of biogas production at the municipal wastewater treatment plant by co-digestion with poultry industry waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 387-394.
    2. Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski & Marcin Zieliński, 2025. "Innovative Method for Biomethane Production Based on a Closed Cycle of Biogas Upgrading and Organic Substrate Pretreatment—Technical, Economic, and Technological Fundamentals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Frank K. Radosits & Amela Ajanovic & Michael Harasek, 2024. "The relevance of biomass‐based gases as energy carriers: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), July.
    4. Elena Albini & Isabella Pecorini & Giovanni Ferrara, 2019. "Improvement of Digestate Stability Using Dark Fermentation and Anaerobic Digestion Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Godoy, Verónica & Martín-Lara, María Ángeles & Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo & Arjandas, Sunil & Calero, Mónica, 2024. "Environmental impact assessment of the production of biomethane from landfill biogas and its use as vehicle fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    6. Mancini, G. & Luciano, A. & Bolzonella, D. & Fatone, F. & Viotti, P. & Fino, D., 2021. "A water-waste-energy nexus approach to bridge the sustainability gap in landfill-based waste management regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Johannes Full & Silja Hohmann & Sonja Ziehn & Edgar Gamero & Tobias Schließ & Hans-Peter Schmid & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2023. "Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Lu, Yu & Xiang, Yue & Huang, Yuan & Yu, Bin & Weng, Liguo & Liu, Junyong, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning based optimal scheduling of active distribution system considering distributed generation, energy storage and flexible load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    10. Elena Rossi & Isabella Pecorini & Giovanni Ferrara & Renato Iannelli, 2022. "Dry Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: Biogas Production Optimization by Reducing Ammonia Inhibition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Mata-Alvarez, J. & Dosta, J. & Romero-Güiza, M.S. & Fonoll, X. & Peces, M. & Astals, S., 2014. "A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 412-427.
    12. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Pablo Emilio Escamilla-García & Ana Lilia Coria-Páez & Francisco Pérez-Soto & Francisco Gutiérrez-Galicia & Carolina Caire & Blanca L. Martínez-Vargas, 2023. "Financial and Technical Evaluation of Energy Production by Biological and Thermal Treatments of MSW in Mexico City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Mohammadpour, Hossein & Cord-Ruwisch, Ralf & Pivrikas, Almantas & Ho, Goen, 2022. "Simple energy-efficient electrochemically-driven CO2 scrubbing for biogas upgrading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 274-282.
    15. Alessia Amato & Konstantina Tsigkou & Alessandro Becci & Francesca Beolchini & Nicolò M. Ippolito & Francesco Ferella, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Biomethane vs. Fossil Methane Production and Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Lidia Lombardi & Barbara Mendecka & Simone Fabrizi, 2020. "Solar Integrated Anaerobic Digester: Energy Savings and Economics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Zhou, Jianzhao & Ayub, Yousaf & Shi, Tao & Ren, Jingzheng & He, Chang, 2024. "Sustainable co-valorization of medical waste and biomass waste: Innovative process design, optimization and assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    18. Tonanzi, B. & Gallipoli, A. & Gianico, A. & Montecchio, D. & Pagliaccia, P. & Rossetti, S. & Braguglia, C.M., 2021. "Elucidating the key factors in semicontinuous anaerobic digestion of urban biowaste: The crucial role of sludge addition in process stability, microbial community enrichment and methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 272-284.
    19. Yang, Wenjun & Guo, Jia & Vartosh, Aris, 2022. "Optimal economic-emission planning of multi-energy systems integrated electric vehicles with modified group search optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    20. Julia Burmistrova & Marc Beutel & Erin Hestir & Rebecca Ryals & Pramod Pandey, 2022. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion to Enhance Waste Management Sustainability at Yosemite National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:308:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224023673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.