IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i9p3625-d1130465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial and Technical Evaluation of Energy Production by Biological and Thermal Treatments of MSW in Mexico City

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Emilio Escamilla-García

    (CECYT 13, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, 1620 Taxqueña Ave., Coyoacán, Mexico City 04250, Mexico)

  • Ana Lilia Coria-Páez

    (ESCA TEP, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 16020, Mexico)

  • Francisco Pérez-Soto

    (DICEA, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico)

  • Francisco Gutiérrez-Galicia

    (UPIIH, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Pachuca 41162, Mexico)

  • Carolina Caire

    (UPIICSA, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 08400, Mexico)

  • Blanca L. Martínez-Vargas

    (CECYT 18, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Zacatecas 98160, Mexico)

Abstract

This research aims to compare, from a technical and financial perspective, the application of biological (methane-capture) and thermal (incineration) treatments of waste in Mexico City in order to generate clean energy. For each alternative, pessimist (50%), realistic (80%), and optimistic (100%) scenarios were considered in terms of the efficiency collection rates of methane and the efficiency of the capacity conversion factor for incineration. For the methane project, the LandGEM model was used to evaluate the potential generation of methane. In order to calculate the electricity output that could be generated through incineration, we relied on two key factors: the total amount of heat that could be generated by burning the waste and the average level of moisture in the waste material. The evaluation resulted in an annual energy generation of 206.09 GWh for methane and 4183.39 GWh for incineration, both in the realistic scenario. Both projects reported positive financial indicators with a discount rate of 12%. Incineration resulted in a net present value of USD 706,377,303 and an internal rate of return of 23% versus USD 4,975,369 and 24% for the methane project. However, the incineration project only became feasible by omitting financing. Incineration resulted in a payback period that was lower by a ratio of 2:1 compared to methane, but the levelized cost of energy resulted in higher figures (USD 216.92). The aim of these findings is to support the decision-making process for the creation and implementation of sustainable energy strategies based on circular economy principles in Mexico and other similar regions across the globe.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Emilio Escamilla-García & Ana Lilia Coria-Páez & Francisco Pérez-Soto & Francisco Gutiérrez-Galicia & Carolina Caire & Blanca L. Martínez-Vargas, 2023. "Financial and Technical Evaluation of Energy Production by Biological and Thermal Treatments of MSW in Mexico City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3625-:d:1130465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jamasb, Tooraj & Nepal, Rabindra, 2010. "Issues and options in waste management: A social cost–benefit analysis of waste-to-energy in the UK," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1341-1352.
    2. Yin, Yongjun & Chen, Shaoxu & Li, Xusheng & Jiang, Bo & Zhao, Joe RuHe & Nong, Guangzai, 2021. "Comparative analysis of different CHP systems using biogas for the cassava starch plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Leme, Marcio Montagnana Vicente & Rocha, Mateus Henrique & Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Lopes, Bruno Marciano & Ferreira, Cláudio Homero, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact assessment of energy recovery from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Brazil," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 8-20.
    4. Oluwaseun Nubi & Stephen Morse & Richard J. Murphy, 2022. "Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation from Municipal Solid Waste in Nigeria: A Prospective Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Pantaleo, Antonio M. & Camporeale, Sergio M. & Sorrentino, Arianna & Miliozzi, Adio & Shah, Nilay & Markides, Christos N., 2020. "Hybrid solar-biomass combined Brayton/organic Rankine-cycle plants integrated with thermal storage: Techno-economic feasibility in selected Mediterranean areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2913-2931.
    6. Dek Vimean Pheakdey & Nguyen Van Quan & Tran Dang Xuan, 2023. "Economic and Environmental Benefits of Energy Recovery from Municipal Solid Waste in Phnom Penh Municipality, Cambodia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Ando, Y. & Yoshikawa, K. & Beck, M. & Endo, H., 2005. "Research and development of a low-BTU gas-driven engine for waste gasification and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 2206-2218.
    8. Francisco Gutiérrez Galicia & Ana Lilia Coria Páez & Ricardo Tejeida Padilla, 2019. "A Study and Factor Identification of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-41, November.
    9. Tatsuya Yoshizaki & Yoshihito Shirai & Mohd Hassan & Azhari Baharuddin & Nik Abdullah & Alawi Sulaiman & Zainuri Busu, 2012. "Economic analysis of biogas and compost projects in a palm oil mill with clean development mechanism in Malaysia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 1065-1079, December.
    10. Gradus, Raymond H.J.M. & Nillesen, Paul H.L. & Dijkgraaf, Elbert & van Koppen, Rick J., 2017. "A Cost-effectiveness Analysis for Incineration or Recycling of Dutch Household Plastic Waste," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 22-28.
    11. Pablo Emilio Escamilla García & María Elena Tavera Cortés & Raúl Junior Sandoval Gómez & Edmar Salinas Callejas & Horacio Eliseo Alvarado Raya, 2016. "Economic feasibility analysis for electrical generation from biogas in waste disposal sites in Mexico City," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(59), pages 5761-5771, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margallo, M. & Dominguez-Ramos, A. & Aldaco, R. & Bala, A. & Fullana, P. & Irabien, A., 2014. "Environmental sustainability assessment in the process industry: A case study of waste-to-energy plants in Spain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 144-155.
    2. Aunedi, Marko & Pantaleo, Antonio Marco & Kuriyan, Kamal & Strbac, Goran & Shah, Nilay, 2020. "Modelling of national and local interactions between heat and electricity networks in low-carbon energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. Oyekale, Joseph & Petrollese, Mario & Cau, Giorgio, 2020. "Modified auxiliary exergy costing in advanced exergoeconomic analysis applied to a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    4. Ma, Chenshuo & Zhang, Yifei & Ma, Keni & Li, Chanyun, 2023. "Study on the relationship between service scale and investment cost of energy service stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    5. Woon, Kok Sin & Lo, Irene M.C., 2016. "An integrated life cycle costing and human health impact analysis of municipal solid waste management options in Hong Kong using modified eco-efficiency indicator," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 104-114.
    6. Huang, T.Y. & Chiueh, P.T. & Lo, S.L., 2017. "Life-cycle environmental and cost impacts of reusing fly ash," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 255-260.
    7. Broberg, Thomas & Dijkgraaf, Elbert & Meens-Eriksson, Sef, 2022. "Burn or let them bury? The net social cost of producing district heating from imported waste," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Middelhoff, Ella & Madden, Ben & Ximenes, Fabiano & Carney, Catherine & Florin, Nick, 2022. "Assessing electricity generation potential and identifying possible locations for siting hybrid concentrated solar biomass (HCSB) plants in New South Wales (NSW), Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    9. Ji, Ling & Liang, Xiaolin & Xie, Yulei & Huang, Guohe & Wang, Bing, 2021. "Optimal design and sensitivity analysis of the stand-alone hybrid energy system with PV and biomass-CHP for remote villages," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. Gutiérrez, R.E. & Haro, P. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2021. "Techno-economic and operational assessment of concentrated solar power plants with a dual supporting system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    11. Mauro Villarini & Vera Marcantonio & Andrea Colantoni & Enrico Bocci, 2019. "Sensitivity Analysis of Different Parameters on the Performance of a CHP Internal Combustion Engine System Fed by a Biomass Waste Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Elbert Dijkgraaf & Raymond Gradus, 2019. "More bottle banks only imply a small increase in recycling of glass in the Netherlands," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-088/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. Negro, Viviana & Noussan, Michel & Chiaramonti, David, 2025. "Alternative options for biogas-to-energy: A comparison of electricity and biomethane generation based on the real operation of a production site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).
    15. Borazon, Elaine Quintana & Chuang, Hsueh-Hua, 2023. "Resilience in educational system: A systematic review and directions for future research," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Petrollese, Mario & Cocco, Daniele, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of hybrid CSP-biogas power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 420-431.
    17. Elbert Dijkgraaf & Raymond Gradus, 2021. "Are Bottle Banks Sufficiently Effective for Increasing Glass Recycling Rates?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-11, August.
    18. Toniolo, Sara & Pieretto, Chiara & Camana, Daniela, 2023. "A lifecycle-based indicator to support residual solid waste flow planning at the regional level," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Olimpia Smaranda Mintaș & Daniela Camelia Marele & Alina Stefania Stanciu & Adrian Gheorghe Osiceanu & Alina Stanca Osiceanu & Horia Pop & Teodor Rusu, 2025. "Sustainability of the Integrated Waste Management System: A Case Study of Bihor County, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-34, March.
    20. Xue, Xiaojun & Lv, Jiayang & Chen, Heng & Xu, Gang & Li, Qiubai, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic analyses of a new compressed air energy storage system incorporated with a waste-to-energy plant and a biogas power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3625-:d:1130465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.