IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i5p1033-d1596000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Method for Biomethane Production Based on a Closed Cycle of Biogas Upgrading and Organic Substrate Pretreatment—Technical, Economic, and Technological Fundamentals

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Kazimierowicz

    (Department of Water Supply and Sewage Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Marcin Dębowski

    (Department of Environment Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Str. Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Marcin Zieliński

    (Department of Environment Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Str. Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

This study presents the technological, technical, and economic basis of the solution developed by the authors for the production of biomethane based on the pretreatment of organic substrates at low temperature using solidified CO 2 captured during biogas upgrading in a closed cycle (TeCH4BiogasUp). TeCH4BiogasUp integrates the disintegration of organic substrates, biogas upgrading and the sequestration and utilization of CO 2 in a closed cycle. The multifunctional and hybrid nature of TeCH4BiogasUp sets it apart from other available solutions that only perform selected, individual technological processes. This is a significant advantage and a competitive market edge; however, it also poses challenges in conducting comparative analyses with existing solutions on the market. The technology has been compared with traditional substrate pretreatment techniques and biogas purification technologies. Considering the origin of the solidified CO 2 , this method can be regarded as material recycling, which aligns fully with the principles of the circular economy. This technology supports the reduction in CO 2 emissions by capturing the CO 2 and introducing it into the closed process. This novel approach to the production and utilization of solidified CO 2 largely overcomes previous limitations associated with the low profitability of the process. TeCH4BiogasUp could serve as a viable alternative to other methods, particularly in light of economic trends and the imperative to reduce CO 2 emissions through the development of renewable energy sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski & Marcin Zieliński, 2025. "Innovative Method for Biomethane Production Based on a Closed Cycle of Biogas Upgrading and Organic Substrate Pretreatment—Technical, Economic, and Technological Fundamentals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1033-:d:1596000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1033/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1033/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matteo Galloni & Gioele Di Marcoberardino, 2024. "Biogas Upgrading Technology: Conventional Processes and Emerging Solutions Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Zbigniew Rogala & Michał Stanclik & Dariusz Łuszkiewicz & Ziemowit Malecha, 2023. "Perspectives for the Use of Biogas and Biomethane in the Context of the Green Energy Transformation on the Example of an EU Country," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Hosseini Koupaie, E. & Lin, L. & Bazyar Lakeh, A.A. & Azizi, A. & Dhar, B.R. & Hafez, H. & Elbeshbishy, E., 2021. "Performance evaluation and microbial community analysis of mesophilic and thermophilic sludge fermentation processes coupled with thermal hydrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Vladimír Hönig & Petr Prochazka & Michal Obergruber & Luboš Smutka & Viera Kučerová, 2019. "Economic and Technological Analysis of Commercial LNG Production in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Ghorbani, Bahram & Manizadeh, Ali, 2020. "Cryogenic biogas upgrading process using solar energy (process integration, development, and energy analysis)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Orlando Corigliano & Marco Iannuzzi & Crescenzo Pellegrino & Francesco D’Amico & Leonardo Pagnotta & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Enhancing Energy Processes and Facilities Redesign in an Anaerobic Digestion Plant for Biomethane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Iwona Zawieja & Małgorzata Worwąg, 2021. "Biogas Production from Excess Sludge Oxidized with Peracetic Acid (PAA)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Francesco Zito, Pasquale & Brunetti, Adele & Barbieri, Giuseppe, 2022. "Renewable biomethane production from biogas upgrading via membrane separation: Experimental analysis and multistep configuration design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 777-787.
    9. Abd, Ammar Ali & Othman, Mohd Roslee & Majdi, Hasan Sh & Helwani, Zuchra, 2023. "Green route for biomethane and hydrogen production via integration of biogas upgrading using pressure swing adsorption and steam-methane reforming process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 64-78.
    10. Elagroudy, S. & Radwan, A.G. & Banadda, N. & Mostafa, Nagwan G. & Owusu, P.A. & Janajreh, I., 2020. "Mathematical models comparison of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of microwave pretreated mixed sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1009-1020.
    11. Yu, Zhichao & Kamran, Hafiz Waqas & Amin, Azka & Ahmed, Bilal & Peng, Sun, 2023. "Sustainable synergy via clean energy technologies and efficiency dynamics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Tomasz Janusz Teleszewski & Leszek Hożejowski, 2024. "Estimating Sludge Deposition on the Heat Exchanger in the Digester of a Biogas Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    13. Naquash, Ahmad & Agarwal, Neha & Nizami, Muhammad & Nga, Nguyen Nhu & Aziz, Muhammad & Lee, Moonyong, 2024. "Unlocking the potential of cryogenic biogas upgrading technologies integrated with bio-LNG production: A comparative assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Shuaibing & Lin, Haitao & Abed, Azher M. & Mahariq, Ibrahim & Ayed, Hamdi & Mouldi, Abir & Lin, Zhixiang, 2024. "Life cycle analysis of biowaste-to- biogas/biomethane processes: Cost and environmental assessment of four different biowaste scenarios organic fraction of municipal solid waste and secondary sewage s," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. Frank K. Radosits & Amela Ajanovic & Michael Harasek, 2024. "The relevance of biomass‐based gases as energy carriers: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), July.
    3. Johannes Full & Silja Hohmann & Sonja Ziehn & Edgar Gamero & Tobias Schließ & Hans-Peter Schmid & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2023. "Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Hou, Rui & Zhang, Nachuan & Yang, Chengsheng & Zhao, Jing & Li, Peng & Sun, Bo, 2023. "A novel structure of natural gas, electricity, and methanol production using a combined reforming cycle: Integration of biogas upgrading, liquefied natural gas re-gasification, power plant, and methan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    5. Naquash, Ahmad & Agarwal, Neha & Nizami, Muhammad & Nga, Nguyen Nhu & Aziz, Muhammad & Lee, Moonyong, 2024. "Unlocking the potential of cryogenic biogas upgrading technologies integrated with bio-LNG production: A comparative assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    6. Zhao, Dengfeng & Lin, Jingting & Bashir, Muhammad Adnan, 2024. "Analyze the effect of energy efficiency, natural resources, and the digital economy on ecological footprint in OCED countries: The mediating role of renewable energy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Jin Zhang & Xiuling Yin & Zhanxiang Lei & Jianjun Wang & Zifei Fan & Shenaoyi Liu, 2024. "Economic Feasibility of LNG Business: An Integrated Model and Case Study Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, July.
    8. George Mallouppas & Elias Ar. Yfantis & Constantina Ioannou & Andreas Paradeisiotis & Angelos Ktoris, 2023. "Application of Biogas and Biomethane as Maritime Fuels: A Review of Research, Technology Development, Innovation Proposals, and Market Potentials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Mohd Imran Siddiqui & Izharul Haq Farooqi & Farrukh Basheer & Hasan Rameez & Mohamed Hasnain Isa, 2023. "Pretreatment of Slaughterhouse Effluent Treatment Plant Sludge Using Electro-Fenton Process for Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Beata Bień & Jurand D. Bień, 2022. "Analysis of Reject Water Formed in the Mechanical Dewatering Process of Digested Sludge Conditioned by Physical and Chemical Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Dariusz Kusz & Bożena Kusz & Ludwik Wicki & Tomasz Nowakowski & Ryszard Kata & Władysław Brejta & Anna Kasprzyk & Marek Barć, 2024. "The Economic Efficiencies of Investment in Biogas Plants—A Case Study of a Biogas Plant Using Waste from a Dairy Farm in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Józef Ciuła & Iwona Wiewiórska & Marian Banaś & Tadeusz Pająk & Piotr Szewczyk, 2023. "Balance and Energy Use of Biogas in Poland: Prospects and Directions of Development for the Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Petr Procházka & Luboš Smutka & Vladimír Hönig, 2019. "Using Biofuels for Highly Renewable Electricity Systems: A Case Study of the Jatropha curcas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Oumoul-Kairou Karidio Daouda Idrissa & David Tsuanyo & Rodrigue Adjoumani Kouakou & Yacouba Konaté & Boukary Sawadogo & Kouassi Benjamin Yao, 2024. "Analysis of the criteria for improving biogas production: focus on anaerobic digestion," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27083-27110, November.
    15. Naquash, Ahmad & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Bokhari, Awais & Lim, Hankwon & Lee, Moonyong, 2022. "State-of-the-art assessment of cryogenic technologies for biogas upgrading: Energy, economic, and environmental perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Egwu, Uchenna & Oko, Eni & Ndukwu, Macmanus Chinenye & Sallis, Paul, 2021. "Novel low-cost pre-treatment material for enhancing the methane yield during anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks: Experimental and kinetic study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 584-592.
    17. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Olga Evseeva, 2020. "Parameters of Sustainable Development: Case of Arctic Liquefied Natural Gas Projects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, December.
    18. Huang, Hong & Fan, Shuanshi & Wang, Yanhong & Lang, Xuemei & Li, Gang, 2023. "Energy and exergy efficiency analysis for biogas De-CO2 with tetra-n-butylammonium bromide hydrates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    19. Zhang, Chiqian & Rahnuma, Kainat & Hou, Liyuan & Liu, Xiaoguang & Tang, Yuanzhi & Pavlostathis, Spyros G., 2024. "Energy and economic assessment of hydrothermal-treatment-coupled anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    20. Yusuf, Noor & Almomani, Fares, 2023. "Recent advances in biogas purifying technologies: Process design and economic considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1033-:d:1596000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.