IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v272y2023ics036054422300525x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-valorisation of sewage sludge and poultry litter waste for hydrogen production: Gasification process design, sustainability-oriented optimization, and systematic assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Tao
  • Zhou, Jianzhao
  • Ren, Jingzheng
  • Ayub, Yousaf
  • Yu, Haoshui
  • Shen, Weifeng
  • Li, Qiao
  • Yang, Ao

Abstract

In this work, a co-gasification process of sewage sludge and the poultry litter for hydrogen production was developed which involves gasification, water gas shift reaction, acid gas absorption and combustion for power generation. Based on the situations in Hong Kong, the complete processing system was simulated and optimized by developing a composite sustainability objective. The single objective was obtained by the fuzzy method after collecting the decision-making preferences on product yield, economic cost, safety index, environmental impacts, and exergy efficiency. Optimization results showed the exergy efficiency was 30.75%, and the gas turbine operation was most hazardous. The total life cycle greenhouse gas emission was estimated to be 832.58 tons/day with a hydrogen yield of about 47.92 tons/day according to the systematic analysis. Moreover, a subsidy of 115.65 $/ton waste can achieve a relatively attractive profit for the waste-to-H2 process, which was validated by an IRR value of 10% and a positive NPV value in 20 years. The economic sensitivity analysis was finished by testing the influence of some key factors. It was indicated that the subsidy fees, H2 market price, and total equipment cost were relatively more important in the financial profit for this process.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Tao & Zhou, Jianzhao & Ren, Jingzheng & Ayub, Yousaf & Yu, Haoshui & Shen, Weifeng & Li, Qiao & Yang, Ao, 2023. "Co-valorisation of sewage sludge and poultry litter waste for hydrogen production: Gasification process design, sustainability-oriented optimization, and systematic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:272:y:2023:i:c:s036054422300525x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422300525X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Adams, Thomas A., 2021. "Optimal design and operation of a waste tire feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Sanaye, Sepehr & Alizadeh, Pouria & Yazdani, Mohsen, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis of syngas production from wet digested sewage sludge by gasification process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 524-539.
    3. Cavaignac, Renata S. & Ferreira, Newton L. & Guardani, Roberto, 2021. "Techno-economic and environmental process evaluation of biogas upgrading via amine scrubbing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 868-880.
    4. Zhao, Xiang & You, Fengqi, 2021. "Waste respirator processing system for public health protection and climate change mitigation under COVID-19 pandemic: Novel process design and energy, environmental, and techno-economic perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I. & Adams, Thomas A., 2022. "Global optimization of a hybrid waste tire and natural gas feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    6. Hamelinck, Carlo N. & Faaij, André P.C. & den Uil, Herman & Boerrigter, Harold, 2004. "Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1743-1771.
    7. Chen, Guan-Bang & Wu, Fang-Hsien & Fang, Tzu-Lu & Lin, Hsien-Tsung & Chao, Yei-Chin, 2021. "A study of Co-gasification of sewage sludge and palm kernel shells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    8. Qing Yang & Hewen Zhou & Pietro Bartocci & Francesco Fantozzi & Ondřej Mašek & Foster A. Agblevor & Zhiyu Wei & Haiping Yang & Hanping Chen & Xi Lu & Guoqian Chen & Chuguang Zheng & Chris P. Nielsen &, 2021. "Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China’s 2050 carbon reduction and renewable energy goals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Kotowicz, Janusz & Brzęczek, Mateusz, 2018. "Analysis of increasing efficiency of modern combined cycle power plant: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 90-99.
    10. Zhang, Wenqi & Chen, Jianbiao & Fang, Hua & Zhang, Guoxu & Zhu, Zhibing & Xu, Wenhao & Mu, Lin & Zhu, Yuezhao, 2022. "Simulation on co-gasification of bituminous coal and industrial sludge in a downdraft fixed bed gasifier coupling with sensible heat recovery, and potential application in sludge-to-energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    11. Ou, Xunmin & Xiaoyu, Yan & Zhang, Xiliang, 2011. "Life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for electricity generation and supply in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 289-297, January.
    12. Li, Jie & Suvarna, Manu & Pan, Lanjia & Zhao, Yingru & Wang, Xiaonan, 2021. "A hybrid data-driven and mechanistic modelling approach for hydrothermal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    13. Gabbrielli, Roberto & Barontini, Federica & Frigo, Stefano & Bressan, Luigi, 2022. "Numerical analysis of bio-methane production from biomass-sewage sludge oxy-steam gasification and methanation process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    14. Vikram, Shruti & Rosha, Pali & Kumar, Sandeep & Mahajani, Sanjay, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and parametric optimization of steam-CO2 based biomass gasification system using Aspen PLUS," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    15. Heo, Eunnyeong & Kim, Jinsoo & Boo, Kyung-Jin, 2010. "Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2214-2220, October.
    16. Im-orb, Karittha & Simasatitkul, Lida & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Techno-economic analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer–Tropsch integrated process with off-gas recirculation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 483-496.
    17. Kolahchian Tabrizi, Mehrshad & Bonalumi, Davide, 2022. "Techno-economic performance of the 2-propanol/1-butanol zeotropic mixture and 2-propanol/water azeotropic mixture as a working fluid in Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    18. Long Su & Ruijia Liu & Kenan Liu & Kai Li & Li Liu & Yinggang Shi, 2023. "Greenhouse Tomato Picking Robot Chassis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Jianzhao & Ayub, Yousaf & Shi, Tao & Ren, Jingzheng & He, Chang, 2024. "Sustainable co-valorization of medical waste and biomass waste: Innovative process design, optimization and assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Jianzhao & Ayub, Yousaf & Shi, Tao & Ren, Jingzheng & He, Chang, 2024. "Sustainable co-valorization of medical waste and biomass waste: Innovative process design, optimization and assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    2. Sterkhov, K.V. & Khokhlov, D.A. & Zaichenko, M.N., 2024. "Zero carbon emission CCGT power plant with integrated solid fuel gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    3. Im-orb, Karittha & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Techno-environmental analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer-Tropsch integrated process for the co-production of bio-fuel and power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 121-132.
    4. Im-orb, Karittha & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2020. "Process and sustainability analyses of the integrated biomass pyrolysis, gasification, and methanol synthesis process for methanol production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Cui, Xiaowei & Hong, Jinglan & Gao, Mingming, 2012. "Environmental impact assessment of three coal-based electricity generation scenarios in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 952-959.
    6. Im-orb, Karittha & Wiyaratn, Wisitsree & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2018. "Technical and economic assessment of the pyrolysis and gasification integrated process for biomass conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 592-603.
    7. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Kannan, Rohit & Holtorf, Flemming & Adams, Thomas A. & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I., 2023. "Optimization under uncertainty of a hybrid waste tire and natural gas feedstock flexible polygeneration system using a decomposition algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    8. Amigun, Bamikole & Gorgens, Johann & Knoetze, Hansie, 2010. "Biomethanol production from gasification of non-woody plant in South Africa: Optimum scale and economic performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 312-322, January.
    9. Fangyi Li & Zhaoyang Ye & Xilin Xiao & Dawei Ma, 2019. "Environmental Benefits of Stock Evolution of Coal-Fired Power Generators in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Hoefnagels, Ric & Banse, Martin & Dornburg, Veronika & Faaij, André, 2013. "Macro-economic impact of large-scale deployment of biomass resources for energy and materials on a national level—A combined approach for the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 727-744.
    11. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    12. Li, Shenghui & Sun, Xiaojing & Liu, Linlin & Du, Jian, 2023. "A full process optimization of methanol production integrated with co-generation based on the co-gasification of biomass and coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    13. Im-orb, Karittha & Simasatitkul, Lida & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Techno-economic analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer–Tropsch integrated process with off-gas recirculation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 483-496.
    14. Lu, Ke-Miao & Lee, Wen-Jhy & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Lin, Ta-Chang, 2013. "Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetics of co-pyrolysis of raw/torrefied wood and coal blends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 57-65.
    15. Wang, Linzheng & Zhang, Ruizhi & Deng, Ruiqu & Liu, Zeqing & Luo, Yonghao, 2023. "Comprehensive parametric study of fixed-bed co-gasification process through Multiple Thermally Thick Particle (MTTP) model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    16. Damartzis, T. & Zabaniotou, A., 2011. "Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 366-378, January.
    17. Ju-Yeol Ryu & Sungho Park & Changhyeong Lee & Seonghyeon Hwang & Jongwoong Lim, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen–Natural Gas Blended Fuels for 400 MW Combined Cycle Power Plants (CCPPs)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    19. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Huang, Yawen & Tao, Bo & Lal, Rattan & Lorenz, Klaus & Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre & Shrestha, Raj K. & Bai, Xiongxiong & Singh, Maninder P. & Lindsey, Laura E. & Ren, Wei, 2023. "A global synthesis of biochar's sustainability in climate-smart agriculture - Evidence from field and laboratory experiments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:272:y:2023:i:c:s036054422300525x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.