IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v304y2024ics0360544224019303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental study of NH3 and coal Co-firing in a CFB and its nitrogen conversion

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Kun
  • Cheng, Leming
  • Zhao, Xin
  • Wang, Bo
  • Zhang, Qingyu
  • Zhu, Leigang
  • Kang, Qixun
  • Ma, Zhangke

Abstract

This study conducted co-firing experiments of NH3 and coal in a circulating fluidized bed combustor. The effects of NH3 co-firing ratio and combustion atmosphere of NH3 addition position on temperature, flue gas emissions, carbon content of the fly ash, NH3 content in fly ash were investigated. Results showed that NOx and N2O emissions increased with NH3 ratio increasing when adding NH3 in the reducing zone. A lower NOx increment was found within 0∼20 % NH3 ratio, increasing by 0.6 times compared to coal combustion. The NH3 content in fly ash was 2.74 mg/kg when NH3 ratio was 10 %. Compared to the reducing zone, adding NH3 into the oxidizing zone promoted the generation of more NOx and N2O, and simultaneously was detrimental to the burnout of NH3 and CO. Based on these findings, NH3 added in the reducing zone emerges as an optimized choice when NH3 and coal are co-fired in circulating fluidized bed. Extending the retention time of NH3 in the reducing zone was beneficial for controlling NOx and N2O, as well as promoting the burnout of NH3 and CO. Furthermore, fuel-N conversion analysis showed that over 96 % fuel-N was converted into harmless N2 when NH3 ratio exceeds 10 %.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Kun & Cheng, Leming & Zhao, Xin & Wang, Bo & Zhang, Qingyu & Zhu, Leigang & Kang, Qixun & Ma, Zhangke, 2024. "Experimental study of NH3 and coal Co-firing in a CFB and its nitrogen conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:304:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224019303
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224019303
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:304:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224019303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.