IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v301y2024ics0360544224014920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An extended Bayesian network model for calculating dam failure probability based on fuzzy sets and dynamic evidential reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Hua
  • Li, Zongkun
  • Ge, Wei
  • Zhang, Yadong
  • Wang, Te
  • Sun, Heqiang
  • Jiao, Yutie

Abstract

Effective risk analysis is crucial for ensuring the safe operation of hydropower dams. Existing methods typically rely solely on subjective or objective data. The subjectivity of expert opinions and insufficient objective data affect the reliability of results. To reduce subjectivity in the risk analysis process and enhance the utilization of subjective and objective data, this study proposes an extended Bayesian network (BN) model for calculating the dam failure probability based on fuzzy sets (FSs) and dynamic evidential reasoning. To address the fuzziness and uncertainty of expert opinions, a Gaussian FS was introduced to transform expert opinions into fuzzy numbers. Additionally, a dynamic evidential reasoning approach was proposed to combine subjective and objective data, considering their differences, subjectivity, and potential conflicts. To maintain consistency in the fuzzification and defuzzification processes, an improved Onisawa formula was proposed. Finally, the BN was employed for probability prediction and sensitivity analyses. The model was applied to the Z hydropower dam in China. The results showed that the failure probability was 5.2 × 10−4, and the main controllable risk factors were identified. A comparative analysis was conducted and the results showed that the proposed method had a better ability to handle uncertainty, reduce subjectivity, and mitigate conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Hua & Li, Zongkun & Ge, Wei & Zhang, Yadong & Wang, Te & Sun, Heqiang & Jiao, Yutie, 2024. "An extended Bayesian network model for calculating dam failure probability based on fuzzy sets and dynamic evidential reasoning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:301:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224014920
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224014920
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131719?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:301:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224014920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.