IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v290y2024ics036054422303459x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative mathematical approach for hydrothermal carbonization process using an inverse method: Experimental analysis, rheology behavior, and numerical comparative investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Chater, Hamza
  • Asbik, Mohamed

Abstract

Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) shows promise for converting biomass into carbon solids, but simulating it at high biomass-to-water ratios is difficult due to limited models. Existing numerical methods have not been sufficiently tested and validated under such conditions. An experimental approach and a novel non-Newtonian mixture model (NNM) were developed to improve simulation accuracy. This model incorporated rheological parameters using COMSOL Multiphysics software and an inverse method, especially the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The results show that the proposed design achieved desired HTC conditions within 55–70 min, depending on the ratio. Besides, the innovative NNM model proved more effective for predicting thermal behavior and exhibited significantly reduced computation time than other CFD models in the literature, with a maximum 5 % relative deviation, indicating lower computational costs. Infrared camera measurements validated the heat behavior predicted by the NNM. Moreover, during HTC, the mixture behaves as a Newtonian fluid at a 1/6 ratio, and as a shear-thinning fluid at 1/3 and 1/2 ratios, with viscosity decreasing with increasing shear rate and temperature. This study presents innovative findings in the field of HTC, offering a reliable NNM model for simulating HTC under challenging conditions, addressing the mixture's rheology, and proposing a novel design.

Suggested Citation

  • Chater, Hamza & Asbik, Mohamed, 2024. "Innovative mathematical approach for hydrothermal carbonization process using an inverse method: Experimental analysis, rheology behavior, and numerical comparative investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:290:y:2024:i:c:s036054422303459x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.130065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422303459X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.130065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamza Chater & Mohamed Asbik & Abdelghani Koukouch & Ammar Mouaky & Stéphane Bostyn & Brahim Sarh & Fouzi Tabet, 2022. "Analysis of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer inside a Batch Reactor for Hydrothermal Carbonization Process of a Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Heidari, Mohammad & Salaudeen, Shakirudeen & Arku, Precious & Acharya, Bishnu & Tasnim, Syeda & Dutta, Animesh, 2021. "Development of a mathematical model for hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: Comparison of experimental measurements with model predictions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    3. Álvarez-Murillo, A. & Sabio, E. & Ledesma, B. & Román, S. & González-García, C.M., 2016. "Generation of biofuel from hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Kinetics modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 600-608.
    4. Aminian, Ali & ZareNezhad, Bahman, 2018. "Accurate predicting the viscosity of biodiesels and blends using soft computing models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 488-500.
    5. Sangare, Diakaridia & Bostyn, Stéphane & Moscosa-Santillan, Mario & Gökalp, Iskender, 2021. "Hydrodynamics, heat transfer and kinetics reaction of CFD modeling of a batch stirred reactor under hydrothermal carbonization conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    6. Kambo, Harpreet Singh & Dutta, Animesh, 2015. "A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 359-378.
    7. Barbara Mendecka & Giovanni Di Ilio & Lidia Lombardi, 2020. "Thermo-Fluid Dynamic and Kinetic Modeling of Hydrothermal Carbonization of Olive Pomace in a Batch Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chater, Hamza & Bakhattar, Ilias & Asbik, Mohamed & Koukouch, Abdelghani & Mouaky, Ammar & Ouachakradi, Zakariae, 2024. "Hybrid solar hydrothermal carbonization by integrating photovoltaic and parabolic trough technologies: Energy and exergy analyses, innovative designs, and mathematical Modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. Chater, Hamza & Asbik, Mohamed & Koukouch, Abdelghani & Mouaky, Ammar & Zakariae, Ouachakradi & Sarh, Brahim, 2024. "Energy and exergy analysis of an innovative solar system for hydrothermal carbonization process using photovoltaic solar panels," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mitchell Ubene & Mohammad Heidari & Animesh Dutta, 2022. "Computational Modeling Approaches of Hydrothermal Carbonization: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Cheng, Chen & Ding, Lu & Guo, Qinghua & He, Qing & Gong, Yan & Alexander, Kozlov N. & Yu, Guangsuo, 2022. "Process analysis and kinetic modeling of coconut shell hydrothermal carbonization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    3. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    4. Shen, Yafei & Yu, Shili & Ge, Shun & Chen, Xingming & Ge, Xinlei & Chen, Mindong, 2017. "Hydrothermal carbonization of medical wastes and lignocellulosic biomass for solid fuel production from lab-scale to pilot-scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 312-323.
    5. Michela Lucian & Maurizio Volpe & Luca Fiori, 2019. "Hydrothermal Carbonization Kinetics of Lignocellulosic Agro-Wastes: Experimental Data and Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Silvia Román & Judy Libra & Nicole Berge & Eduardo Sabio & Kyoung Ro & Liang Li & Beatriz Ledesma & Andrés Álvarez & Sunyoung Bae, 2018. "Hydrothermal Carbonization: Modeling, Final Properties Design and Applications: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Giuseppe Maggiotto & Gianpiero Colangelo & Marco Milanese & Arturo de Risi, 2023. "Thermochemical Technologies for the Optimization of Olive Wood Biomass Energy Exploitation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Tiago Teribele & Maria Elizabeth Gemaque Costa & Conceição de Maria Sales da Silva & Lia Martins Pereira & Lucas Pinto Bernar & Douglas Alberto Rocha de Castro & Fernanda Paula da Costa Assunção & Mar, 2023. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Corn Stover: Structural Evolution of Hydro-Char and Degradation Kinetics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    9. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhu, Zongyuan & Shen, Boxiong & Liu, Lina, 2019. "Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-598.
    10. Yao, Zhongliang & Ma, Xiaoqian & Xiao, Zhiyuan, 2020. "The effect of two pretreatment levels on the pyrolysis characteristics of water hyacinth," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 514-527.
    11. Tobias Pröll & Florian Zerobin, 2019. "Biomass-based negative emission technology options with combined heat and power generation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 1307-1324, October.
    12. Aragón-Briceño, C.I. & Pozarlik, A.K. & Bramer, E.A. & Niedzwiecki, Lukasz & Pawlak-Kruczek, H. & Brem, G., 2021. "Hydrothermal carbonization of wet biomass from nitrogen and phosphorus approach: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 401-415.
    13. Lee, Jechan & Kim, Soosan & You, Siming & Park, Young-Kwon, 2023. "Bioenergy generation from thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass-based integrated renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Chater, Hamza & Bakhattar, Ilias & Asbik, Mohamed & Koukouch, Abdelghani & Mouaky, Ammar & Ouachakradi, Zakariae, 2024. "Hybrid solar hydrothermal carbonization by integrating photovoltaic and parabolic trough technologies: Energy and exergy analyses, innovative designs, and mathematical Modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    15. Eunhye Song & Ho Kim & Kyung Woo Kim & Young-Man Yoon, 2023. "Characteristic Evaluation of Different Carbonization Processes for Hydrochar, Torrefied Char, and Biochar Produced from Cattle Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Neel Patel & Bishnu Acharya & Prabir Basu, 2021. "Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) of Seaweed (Macroalgae) for Producing Hydrochar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Waheed A. Rasaq & Mateusz Golonka & Miklas Scholz & Andrzej Białowiec, 2021. "Opportunities and Challenges of High-Pressure Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Akbari, Maryam & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Kumar, Amit, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of wet and dry torrefaction of biomass feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    19. Gai, Chao & Chen, Mengjun & Liu, Tingting & Peng, Nana & Liu, Zhengang, 2016. "Gasification characteristics of hydrochar and pyrochar derived from sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 957-965.
    20. Magdziarz, Aneta & Mlonka-Mędrala, Agata & Sieradzka, Małgorzata & Aragon-Briceño, Christian & Pożarlik, Artur & Bramer, Eddy A. & Brem, Gerrit & Niedzwiecki, Łukasz & Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina, 2021. "Multiphase analysis of hydrochars obtained by anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste organic fraction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 108-118.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:290:y:2024:i:c:s036054422303459x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.