IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i5p1145-d1600077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation and Reaction Network Modelling for the Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Shorea Wood Sawdust

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Elhassan

    (Centre for Advanced Material and Energy Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei)

  • Muhammad Raziq Rahimi Kooh

    (Centre for Advanced Material and Energy Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei)

  • Yuan-Fong Chou Chau

    (Centre for Advanced Material and Energy Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei)

  • Rosnah Abdullah

    (Faculty of Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei)

Abstract

This study investigates the hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) aqueous phase (AP) of Shorea sawdust in a semi-flow batch reactor, focusing on the reaction network and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to detect lignocellulosic decomposition compounds, revealing the presence of glucose, galactose, xylose, furfural, ethanol, and other undefined compounds due to lignocellulosic decomposition. Reaction ordinate (R 0 ) indicates that the reaction progresses steadily as time increases, and higher temperature leads to a greater reaction ordinate, agreeing with Arrhenius’ assumption that gained energy enables molecules to overcome the activation energy barrier. However, saccharide C6 and C5 yield at 220 °C fluctuates as the reaction increases, suggesting secondary reactions. A kinetic model was built based on a reaction network, which was developed based on HPLC results. Arrhenius parameters revealed that reaction yield is influenced by temperature and time, whereas galactose, xylose, and ethanol production are time dependent. In contrast, glucose formation is influenced by both time and temperature. The prediction of saccharide yields by the model confirmed that 220 °C is the optimal temperature for glucose and ethanol production, balancing slow reactions and rapid degradation. CFD simulations show a uniform pressure distribution inside the reaction chamber with high localised pressure at the input (1570 Pa). In addition, feedstock particles tend to distribute along the chamber wall because of the laminar flow, which is consistent with the observation of the experiment. The findings highlight the intricate relationship between reaction conditions and the composition of the HTL product, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Elhassan & Muhammad Raziq Rahimi Kooh & Yuan-Fong Chou Chau & Rosnah Abdullah, 2025. "Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation and Reaction Network Modelling for the Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Shorea Wood Sawdust," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1145-:d:1600077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Haoyu & Han, Xue & Zeng, Yimin & Xu, Chunbao Charles, 2023. "Development of a global kinetic model based on chemical compositions of lignocellulosic biomass for predicting product yields from hydrothermal liquefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Chater, Hamza & Asbik, Mohamed, 2024. "Innovative mathematical approach for hydrothermal carbonization process using an inverse method: Experimental analysis, rheology behavior, and numerical comparative investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Heidari, Mohammad & Salaudeen, Shakirudeen & Arku, Precious & Acharya, Bishnu & Tasnim, Syeda & Dutta, Animesh, 2021. "Development of a mathematical model for hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: Comparison of experimental measurements with model predictions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    4. Brand, Steffen & Hardi, Flabianus & Kim, Jaehoon & Suh, Dong Jin, 2014. "Effect of heating rate on biomass liquefaction: Differences between subcritical water and supercritical ethanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 420-427.
    5. Li, Rundong & Xie, Yinghui & Yang, Tianhua & Li, Bingshuo & Zhang, Yang & Kai, Xingping, 2016. "Characteristics of the products of hydrothermal liquefaction combined with cellulosic bio-ethanol process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 862-867.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Xiao-Fei & Yin, Shuang-Shuang & Zhou, Qian & Li, Ming-Fei & Peng, Feng & Xiao, Xiao, 2019. "Subcritical liquefaction of lignocellulose for the production of bio-oils in ethanol/water system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 865-872.
    2. Muhammad Usman & Shuo Cheng & Sasipa Boonyubol & Jeffrey S. Cross, 2023. "Evaluating Green Solvents for Bio-Oil Extraction: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-45, August.
    3. Chater, Hamza & Bakhattar, Ilias & Asbik, Mohamed & Koukouch, Abdelghani & Mouaky, Ammar & Ouachakradi, Zakariae, 2024. "Hybrid solar hydrothermal carbonization by integrating photovoltaic and parabolic trough technologies: Energy and exergy analyses, innovative designs, and mathematical Modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    4. Prajitno, Hermawan & Park, Jongkeun & Ryu, Changkook & Park, Ho Young & Lim, Hyun Soo & Kim, Jaehoon, 2018. "Effects of solvent participation and controlled product separation on biomass liquefaction: A case study of sewage sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 402-416.
    5. Wang, Tengfei & Zhai, Yunbo & Zhu, Yun & Li, Caiting & Zeng, Guangming, 2018. "A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 223-247.
    6. Kandasamy, Sabariswaran & Zhang, Bo & He, Zhixia & Chen, Haitao & Feng, Huan & Wang, Qian & Wang, Bin & Ashokkumar, Veeramuthu & Siva, Subramanian & Bhuvanendran, Narayanamoorthy & Krishnamoorthi, M., 2020. "Effect of low-temperature catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina platensis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Fang, Peiwen & Gong, Zhiqiang & Wang, Zhenbo & Wang, Zhentong & Meng, Fanzhi, 2019. "Study on combustion and emission characteristics of microalgae and its extraction residue with TG-MS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 884-894.
    8. Ahmad, Nabeel & Ahmad, Nauman & Maafa, Ibrahim M. & Ahmed, Usama & Akhter, Parveen & Shehzad, Nasir & Amjad, Um-e-salma & Hussain, Murid & Javaid, Momina, 2020. "Conversion of poly-isoprene based rubber to value-added chemicals and liquid fuel via ethanolysis: Effect of operating parameters on product quality and quantity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Ajorloo, Mojtaba & Ghodrat, Maryam & Scott, Jason & Strezov, Vladimir, 2024. "Experimental analysis of the effects of feedstock composition on the plastic and biomass Co-gasification process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    11. Li, Bingshuo & Yang, Tianhua & Li, Rundong & Kai, Xingping, 2020. "Co-generation of liquid biofuels from lignocellulose by integrated biochemical and hydrothermal liquefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Yang, Ke & Wu, Kai & Zhang, Huiyan, 2022. "Machine learning prediction of the yield and oxygen content of bio-oil via biomass characteristics and pyrolysis conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    13. Wang, Xiaochao & Wang, Wei & Yu, Jie, 2024. "The mechanism on liquefaction of waste tire by ethanolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    14. Zeb, Hassan & Choi, Jaeyeon & Kim, Yunje & Kim, Jaehoon, 2017. "A new role of supercritical ethanol in macroalgae liquefaction (Saccharina japonica): Understanding ethanol participation, yield, and energy efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 116-126.
    15. Amira Alazmi & Sabina A. Nicolae & Pierpaolo Modugno & Bashir E. Hasanov & Maria M. Titirici & Pedro M. F. J. Costa, 2021. "Activated Carbon from Palm Date Seeds for CO 2 Capture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-11, November.
    16. Wang, Liping & Chang, Yuzhi & Li, Aimin, 2019. "Hydrothermal carbonization for energy-efficient processing of sewage sludge: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 423-440.
    17. Chater, Hamza & Asbik, Mohamed, 2024. "Innovative mathematical approach for hydrothermal carbonization process using an inverse method: Experimental analysis, rheology behavior, and numerical comparative investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    18. Brand, Steffen & Kim, Jaehoon, 2015. "Liquefaction of major lignocellulosic biomass constituents in supercritical ethanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 64-74.
    19. Ong, Benjamin H.Y. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J. & Varbanov, Petar S. & Walmsley, Michael R.W., 2019. "A heat- and mass-integrated design of hydrothermal liquefaction process co-located with a Kraft pulp mill," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Munir, M. Tajammal & Mansouri, Seyed Soheil & Udugama, Isuru A. & Baroutian, Saeid & Gernaey, Krist V. & Young, Brent R., 2018. "Resource recovery from organic solid waste using hydrothermal processing: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 64-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1145-:d:1600077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.