IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v288y2024ics0360544223030517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conventional and advanced exergy-exergoeconomic-exergoenvironmental analyses of an organic Rankine cycle integrated with solar and biomass energy sources

Author

Listed:
  • Qi, Xinrui
  • Yang, Chunsheng
  • Huang, Mingyang
  • Ma, Zhenjun
  • Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna
  • Feng, Ke
  • Siarry, Patrick
  • Królczyk, Grzegorz
  • Li, Z.

Abstract

Considering the huge consumption of traditional energy and the rising demand for electricity, the development of renewable energy is very necessary. In this paper, an energy system integrating biomass energy, solar and two-stage organic Rankine cycle (ORC) is proposed, which uses the stable energy output of biomass energy to compensate for the volatility of solar modules. The proposed system comprises a biomass boiler, photovoltaic thermal panels (PV/T), evaporators, condensers, working medium pumps, turbines, a preheater and an air preheater. In addition, conventional and advanced exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental (3E) analyses are carried out. Conventional 3E analyses reveal two components that require priority improvement. They are respectively evaporator 1 with the largest exergy destruction (708.2 kW) and exergy destruction environmental impact rate (775.3 mPt/h) and evaporator 2 with the largest exergy destruction cost rate (19.15$/h). The results of advanced 3E analyses show that the largest avoidable endogenous exergy destruction is condenser 1 (136.6 kW), the largest avoidable endogenous exergy destruction cost rate is condenser 2 (3.377$/h), and the largest avoidable endogenous exergy destruction environmental impact rate is condenser 1 (196.1mPt/h). These mean that these components have great potential for improvement in reducing exergy destruction, saving cost and protecting the environment. In addition, the avoidable endogenous exergy destruction/cost/environmental impact rate of evaporator 2 are negative, so evaporator 2 is not suitable as a priority component for improvement, which is contrary to the conclusions of conventional 3E analyses. It is found that conventional 3E analyses can only point out the biggest exergy destruction point, but cannot indicate whether the components with the greatest exergy destruction have the greatest potential for improvement. However, advanced 3E analyses can show the improvement potential of each component by improving its own performance and the external conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct advanced 3E analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi, Xinrui & Yang, Chunsheng & Huang, Mingyang & Ma, Zhenjun & Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna & Feng, Ke & Siarry, Patrick & Królczyk, Grzegorz & Li, Z., 2024. "Conventional and advanced exergy-exergoeconomic-exergoenvironmental analyses of an organic Rankine cycle integrated with solar and biomass energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:288:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223030517
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223030517
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khani, Leyla & Mahmoudi, S. Mohammad S. & Chitsaz, Ata & Rosen, Marc A., 2016. "Energy and exergoeconomic evaluation of a new power/cooling cogeneration system based on a solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 64-77.
    2. Mohammadi, Zahra & Fallah, Mohsen, 2023. "Conventional and advanced exergy investigation of a double flash cycle integrated by absorption cooling, ORC, and TEG power system driven by geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Teymouri, Matin & Sadeghi, Shayan & Moghimi, Mahdi & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2021. "3E analysis and optimization of an innovative cogeneration system based on biomass gasification and solar photovoltaic thermal plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Gado, Mohamed G. & Ookawara, Shinichi & Nada, Sameh & Hassan, Hamdy, 2022. "Renewable energy-based cascade adsorption-compression refrigeration system: Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and enviroeconomic perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    5. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Ghorbani, Bahram & Manizadeh, Ali, 2020. "Cryogenic biogas upgrading process using solar energy (process integration, development, and energy analysis)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Shokri Kalan, Ali & Heidarabadi, Shadab & Khaleghi, Mohammad & Ghiasirad, Hamed & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna, 2023. "Biomass-to-energy integrated trigeneration system using supercritical CO2 and modified Kalina cycles: Energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    7. Situmorang, Yohanes Andre & Zhao, Zhongkai & Yoshida, Akihiro & Abudula, Abuliti & Guan, Guoqing, 2020. "Small-scale biomass gasification systems for power generation (<200 kW class): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Matthias Jordan & Volker Lenz & Markus Millinger & Katja Oehmichen & Daniela Thran, 2019. "Future competitive bioenergy technologies in the German heat sector: Findings from an economic optimization approach," Papers 1908.10065, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2019.
    9. Meyer, Lutz & Tsatsaronis, George & Buchgeister, Jens & Schebek, Liselotte, 2009. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 75-89.
    10. Desai, Nishith B. & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2009. "Process integration of organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1674-1686.
    11. Tian, Zhen & Chen, Xiaochen & Zhang, Yuan & Gao, Wenzhong & Chen, Wu & Peng, Hao, 2023. "Energy, conventional exergy and advanced exergy analysis of cryogenic recuperative organic rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Mehrabian, M.J. & Nourpour, M. & Onishi, V.C., 2023. "Risk and 4E analyses and optimization of a novel solar-natural gas-driven polygeneration system based on Integration of Gas Turbine–SCO2–ORC-solar PV-PEM electrolyzer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    13. Cocco, Daniele & Petrollese, Mario & Tola, Vittorio, 2017. "Exergy analysis of concentrating solar systems for heat and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 192-203.
    14. Ali Khalid Shaker Al-Sayyab & Joaquín Navarro-Esbrí & Victor Manuel Soto-Francés & Adrián Mota-Babiloni, 2021. "Conventional and Advanced Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Compound Ejector-Heat Pump for Simultaneous Cooling and Heating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-27, June.
    15. Kelly, S. & Tsatsaronis, G. & Morosuk, T., 2009. "Advanced exergetic analysis: Approaches for splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 384-391.
    16. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    17. Wang, Shicheng & Liu, Xin & Gu, Xueying & Huang, Xinyu & Li, Yu, 2023. "Analysis and multi-objective optimization of integrating a syngas-fed solid oxide fuel cell improved by a two-stage expander-organic flash cycle using an ejector and a desalination cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    18. Moharramian, Anahita & Soltani, Saeed & Rosen, Marc A. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Bhattacharya, Tanushree, 2019. "Modified exergy and modified exergoeconomic analyses of a solar based biomass co-fired cycle with hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 715-729.
    19. Oyekale, Joseph & Petrollese, Mario & Cau, Giorgio, 2020. "Modified auxiliary exergy costing in advanced exergoeconomic analysis applied to a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amini, Ali & Mirkhani, Nima & Pakjesm Pourfard, Pedram & Ashjaee, Mehdi & Khodkar, Mohammad Amin, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of low-grade waste heat recovery in Yazd combined-cycle power plant (Iran) by a CO2 transcritical Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 74-84.
    2. Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M. & Masi, Marco & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2014. "Exergo-environmental analysis of a reverse osmosis desalination plant in Gran Canaria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 223-232.
    3. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    4. Esmaeil Jadidi & Mohammad Hasan Khoshgoftar Manesh & Mostafa Delpisheh & Viviani Caroline Onishi, 2021. "Advanced Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Analyses of Integrated Solar-Assisted Gasification Cycle for Producing Power and Steam from Heavy Refinery Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Wang, Qingqiang & Hou, Jili & Wei, Xing & Jin, Nan & Ma, Yue & Li, Shuyuan & Zhao, Yuchao, 2022. "Advanced exergoenvironmental analysis of the oil shale retorting process with SJ-type rectangular retort," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Shadbahr, Jalil & Ebadian, Mahmood & Gonzales-Calienes, Giovanna & Kannangara, Miyuru & Ahmadi, Leila & Bensebaa, Farid, 2022. "Impact of waste management and conversion technologies on cost and carbon footprint - Case studies in rural and urban cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2019. "Advanced exergy-based methods used to understand and improve energy-conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 238-246.
    8. Mergenthaler, Pieter & Schinkel, Arndt-Peter & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "Application of exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, and advanced exergy analyses to Carbon Black production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 898-907.
    9. Tańczuk, Mariusz & Ulbrich, Roman, 2013. "Implementation of a biomass-fired co-generation plant supplied with an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) as a heat source for small scale heat distribution system – A comparative analysis under Polish and G," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 132-141.
    10. Wei, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Bingjian & Wu, Shengyuan & Chen, Qinglin & Tsatsaronis, George, 2012. "Energy-use analysis and evaluation of distillation systems through avoidable exergy destruction and investment costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 424-433.
    11. Aldair Benavides Gamero & Josué Camargo Vanegas & Jorge Duarte Forero & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Rafael Diaz Herazo, 2023. "Advanced Exergo-Environmental Assessments of an Organic Rankine Cycle as Waste Heat Recovery System from a Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    13. Ai, Tianchao & Chen, Hongwei & Zhong, Fanghao & Jia, Jiandong & Song, Yangfan, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization of a novel CCHP system with organic flash cycle based on different operating strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Pierobon, Leonardo & Elmegaard, Brian & Haglind, Fredrik & Breuhaus, Peter & Voldsund, Mari, 2013. "Exergetic assessment of energy systems on North Sea oil and gas platforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 23-36.
    15. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Jacyno, Tomasz & Breuhaus, Peter & Voldsund, Mari & Elmegaard, Brian, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of an upstream petroleum plant operated on a mature field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 454-469.
    16. Adrian Bejan & George Tsatsaronis, 2021. "Purpose in Thermodynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    17. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Navid, P. & Blanco Marigorta, A.M. & Amidpour, M. & Hamedi, M.H., 2013. "New procedure for optimal design and evaluation of cogeneration system based on advanced exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 314-333.
    18. Ziviani, Davide & Beyene, Asfaw & Venturini, Mauro, 2014. "Advances and challenges in ORC systems modeling for low grade thermal energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 79-95.
    19. Incer-Valverde, Jimena & Hamdy, Sarah & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2021. "Improvement perspectives of cryogenics-based energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 629-640.
    20. Wu, Junnian & Wang, Na, 2020. "Exploring avoidable carbon emissions by reducing exergy destruction based on advanced exergy analysis: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:288:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223030517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.