IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v272y2023ics0360544223003894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approach to technology selection in bioelectricity technical potential assessment: A Brazilian case study

Author

Listed:
  • Dovichi Filho, Fernando Bruno
  • Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva
  • Palacio, Jose Carlos Escobar
  • Venturini, Osvaldo José
  • Jaén, René Lesme

Abstract

Technology selection, its power and efficiency determination for electricity generation using agroforestry residues is the main goal and the novelty of this paper. It is based on the fitted efficiency vs. power curves for commercial mature technologies. The assessment of the level of maturity of biomass-based electricity generation Technologies based on Technology Readiness Levels was used as criteria to define the technologies to be considered in this study: conventional Rankine cycle, organic Rankine cycle and gasifier/internal combustion engine. Pretreatment technologies influence on generation costs is determined based on chippers and drum dryers cost and its energy consumption. We developed a coherent methodology for selecting the technology and calculation of power/efficiency of electricity generation projects considering biomass derived from plant-based lignocellulosic solid biomass residues derived from agricultural and forest activities. A case study based on eucalyptus forest residues availability in three microregions of the Minas Gerais State in Brazil allowed to define the technology to be used in each case and its power, efficiency and levelized cost of electricity, that includes pretreatment and logistic costs. Obtained LCOE values are compared with data from different publications, that is a validation of the presented methodology. Results allow concluding about the considerable influence of residues logistics on LCOE.

Suggested Citation

  • Dovichi Filho, Fernando Bruno & Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva & Palacio, Jose Carlos Escobar & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Jaén, René Lesme, 2023. "An approach to technology selection in bioelectricity technical potential assessment: A Brazilian case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:272:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223003894
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223003894
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126995?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Jaswinder, 2015. "Overview of electric power potential of surplus agricultural biomass from economic, social, environmental and technical perspective—A case study of Punjab," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 286-297.
    2. Strzalka, Rafal & Schneider, Dietrich & Eicker, Ursula, 2017. "Current status of bioenergy technologies in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 801-820.
    3. Ma, Zhongqing & Zhang, Yimeng & Zhang, Qisheng & Qu, Yongbiao & Zhou, Jianbin & Qin, Hengfei, 2012. "Design and experimental investigation of a 190 kWe biomass fixed bed gasification and polygeneration pilot plant using a double air stage downdraft approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 140-147.
    4. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 201-215.
    5. Marrs, Gevan & Zamora-Cristales, Rene & Sessions, John, 2016. "Forest biomass feedstock cost sensitivity to grinding parameters for bio-jet fuel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1082-1091.
    6. Patuzzi, Francesco & Basso, Daniele & Vakalis, Stergios & Antolini, Daniele & Piazzi, Stefano & Benedetti, Vittoria & Cordioli, Eleonora & Baratieri, Marco, 2021. "State-of-the-art of small-scale biomass gasification systems: An extensive and unique monitoring review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    7. Bojić, Sanja & Đatkov, Đorđe & Brcanov, Dejan & Georgijević, Milosav & Martinov, Milan, 2013. "Location allocation of solid biomass power plants: Case study of Vojvodina," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 769-775.
    8. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    9. Lee, Uisung & Balu, Elango & Chung, J.N., 2013. "An experimental evaluation of an integrated biomass gasification and power generation system for distributed power applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 699-708.
    10. Mohammad I. Jahirul & Mohammad G. Rasul & Ashfaque Ahmed Chowdhury & Nanjappa Ashwath, 2012. "Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis —A Technological Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-50, November.
    11. Landelle, Arnaud & Tauveron, Nicolas & Haberschill, Philippe & Revellin, Rémi & Colasson, Stéphane, 2017. "Organic Rankine cycle design and performance comparison based on experimental database," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1172-1187.
    12. Andrea Porcu & Stefano Sollai & Davide Marotto & Mauro Mureddu & Francesca Ferrara & Alberto Pettinau, 2019. "Techno-Economic Analysis of a Small-Scale Biomass-to-Energy BFB Gasification-Based System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Gebreegziabher, Tesfaldet & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Hui, Chi Wai, 2013. "Optimum biomass drying for combustion – A modeling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 67-73.
    14. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    15. Bartela, Łukasz & Kotowicz, Janusz & Dubiel-Jurgaś, Klaudia, 2018. "Investment risk for biomass integrated gasification combined heat and power unit with an internal combustion engine and a Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 601-616.
    16. Jesper Graa Andreasen & Andrea Meroni & Fredrik Haglind, 2017. "A Comparison of Organic and Steam Rankine Cycle Power Systems for Waste Heat Recovery on Large Ships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Deboni, Tamires Liza & Simioni, Flávio José & Brand, Martha Andreia & Costa, Valdeci José, 2019. "Models for estimating the price of forest biomass used as an energy source: A Brazilian case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 382-391.
    18. Chul-Seung Hong & Eul-Bum Lee, 2018. "Power Plant Economic Analysis: Maximizing Lifecycle Profitability by Simulating Preliminary Design Solutions of Steam-Cycle Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Elsner, Witold & Wysocki, Marian & Niegodajew, Paweł & Borecki, Roman, 2017. "Experimental and economic study of small-scale CHP installation equipped with downdraft gasifier and internal combustion engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 213-227.
    20. Díaz Pérez, Álvaro A. & Escobar Palacio, José C. & Venturini, Osvaldo J. & Martínez Reyes, Arnaldo M. & Rúa Orozco, Dimas J. & Silva Lora, Electo E. & Almazán del Olmo, Oscar A., 2018. "Thermodynamic and economic evaluation of reheat and regeneration alternatives in cogeneration systems of the Brazilian sugarcane and alcohol sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 247-262.
    21. Abdelhady, Suzan & Borello, Domenico & Shaban, Ahmed, 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of biomass power plant fed with rice straw: Sensitivity and parametric analysis of the performance and the LCOE," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1026-1034.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gojiya, Anil & Deb, Dipankar & Iyer, Kannan K.R., 2019. "Feasibility study of power generation from agricultural residue in comparison with soil incorporation of residue," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 416-425.
    2. Wegener, Moritz & Malmquist, Anders & Isalgué, Antonio & Martin, Andrew, 2018. "Biomass-fired combined cooling, heating and power for small scale applications – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 392-410.
    3. Malico, Isabel & Nepomuceno Pereira, Ricardo & Gonçalves, Ana Cristina & Sousa, Adélia M.O., 2019. "Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 960-977.
    4. Jana, Kuntal & De, Sudipta, 2015. "Polygeneration using agricultural waste: Thermodynamic and economic feasibility study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 648-660.
    5. Lion, Simone & Taccani, Rodolfo & Vlaskos, Ioannis & Scrocco, Pietro & Vouvakos, Xenakis & Kaiktsis, Lambros, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis of waste heat recovery using Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for a two-stroke low speed marine Diesel engine in IMO Tier II and Tier III operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 48-60.
    6. Jana, Kuntal & Ray, Avishek & Majoumerd, Mohammad Mansouri & Assadi, Mohsen & De, Sudipta, 2017. "Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution – A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 88-111.
    7. Sanjay Mukherjee & Abhishek Asthana & Martin Howarth & Jahedul Islam Chowdhury, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Waste Heat Recovery Technologies for the Food Processing Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    9. Liu, Liwei & Ye, Junhong & Zhao, Yufei & Zhao, Erdong, 2015. "The plight of the biomass power generation industry in China – A supply chain risk perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 680-692.
    10. Sharma, Monikankana & N, Rakesh & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 450-463.
    11. Hossein Nami & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam & Ahmad Arabkoohsar & Amir Reza Razmi, 2020. "4E Analyses of a Hybrid Waste-Driven CHP–ORC Plant with Flue Gas Condensation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Marian Piwowarski & Krzysztof Kosowski & Marcin Richert, 2023. "Organic Supercritical Thermodynamic Cycles with Isothermal Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Witanowski, Ł. & Klonowicz, P. & Lampart, P. & Suchocki, T. & Jędrzejewski, Ł. & Zaniewski, D. & Klimaszewski, P., 2020. "Optimization of an axial turbine for a small scale ORC waste heat recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    14. Woodland, Brandon J. & Ziviani, Davide & Braun, James E. & Groll, Eckhard A., 2020. "Considerations on alternative organic Rankine Cycle congurations for low-grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Hend Dakhel Alhassany & Safaa Malik Abbas & Marcos Tostado-Véliz & David Vera & Salah Kamel & Francisco Jurado, 2022. "Review of Bioenergy Potential from the Agriculture Sector in Iraq," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Xu, Weicong & Deng, Shuai & Su, Wen & Zhang, Ying & Zhao, Li & Yu, Zhixin, 2018. "How to approach Carnot cycle via zeotropic working fluid: Research methodology and case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 576-586.
    17. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Kaindl, Johannes & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2019. "Experimental investigation of modern ORC working fluids R1224yd(Z) and R1233zd(E) as replacements for R245fa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 946-963.
    18. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    19. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    20. Diemuodeke, Ogheneruona E. & Mulugetta, Yacob & Imran, Muhammad, 2021. "Techno-economic and environmental feasibility analysis of rice husks fired energy system for application in a cluster of rice mills," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:272:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223003894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.