IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v263y2023ipes036054422202850x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic analysis of a cogeneration system in pulp and paper industry under singular and hybrid operating modes

Author

Listed:
  • Ali, Ramadan Hefny
  • Abdel Samee, Ahmed A.
  • Maghrabie, Hussein M.

Abstract

In the present study, a thermodynamic analysis of a cogeneration system in a pulp and paper industry under different operating modes i.e., singular and hybrid with a variable ambient temperature is conducted according to actual operating data. For singular operating mode, the power boiler is only employed using natural gas while for hybrid operating mode, the power boiler with the recovery boiler is employed using natural gas and black liquor as main fuels, respectively. The results show that for hybrid operating mode in comparison with the singular one, the thermal efficiency of turbine and condenser is enhanced by 1.36 and 7.7%, respectively while it is reduced by 2.8% for the power boiler. In addition, the overall thermal efficiency under singular and hybrid operating modes is 87.4 and 53.7%, respectively. For hybrid operating mode, the exergy destruction of power boiler decreases by almost 10% compared with that for the singular operating mode. Also, at hybrid operating mode, the soda is recovered with a mass flow rate of 33 tons/hour that is required for the cooking process in the chemical pulp section and additionally the consumption of natural gas in the power boiler is reduced by 11.8%.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali, Ramadan Hefny & Abdel Samee, Ahmed A. & Maghrabie, Hussein M., 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis of a cogeneration system in pulp and paper industry under singular and hybrid operating modes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pe:s036054422202850x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422202850X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bühler, Fabian & Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Jensen, Jonas Kjær & Holm, Fridolin Müller & Elmegaard, Brian, 2018. "Energy, exergy and advanced exergy analysis of a milk processing factory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 576-592.
    2. Utlu, Zafer & Kincay, Olcay, 2013. "An assessment of a pulp and paper mill through energy and exergy analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 565-573.
    3. Taner, Tolga & Sivrioglu, Mecit, 2015. "Energy–exergy analysis and optimisation of a model sugar factory in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 641-654.
    4. Teymouri, Matin & Sadeghi, Shayan & Moghimi, Mahdi & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2021. "3E analysis and optimization of an innovative cogeneration system based on biomass gasification and solar photovoltaic thermal plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Ahmadi, Gholam Reza & Toghraie, Davood, 2016. "Energy and exergy analysis of Montazeri Steam Power Plant in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 454-463.
    6. Ferreira, L.R.A. & Otto, R.B. & Silva, F.P. & De Souza, S.N.M. & De Souza, S.S. & Ando Junior, O.H., 2018. "Review of the energy potential of the residual biomass for the distributed generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 440-455.
    7. Wang, Xurong & Yang, Yi & Zheng, Ya & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a supercritical CO2 cycle for a cogeneration application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 971-982.
    8. Cortés, E. & Rivera, W., 2010. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic optimization of a cogeneration pulp and paper mill plant including the use of a heat transformer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1289-1299.
    9. Zhang, Hongsheng & Liu, Xingang & Liu, Yifeng & Duan, Chenghong & Dou, Zhan & Qin, Jiyun, 2021. "Energy and exergy analyses of a novel cogeneration system coupled with absorption heat pump and organic Rankine cycle based on a direct air cooling coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Kaushik, S.C. & Reddy, V. Siva & Tyagi, S.K., 2011. "Energy and exergy analyses of thermal power plants: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 1857-1872, May.
    11. Zaili Zhao & Zhaofeng Yuan & Qinghua Cui & Na Yan, 2010. "Exergy Analysis of an WGZ220/6.8-1 Type Alkali Recovery Boiler," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Janghorban Esfahani, I. & Yoo, C.K., 2013. "Exergy analysis and parametric optimization of three power and fresh water cogeneration systems using refrigeration chillers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 340-355.
    13. Holmberg, Jonas M. & Gustavsson, Leif, 2007. "Biomass use in chemical and mechanical pulping with biomass-based energy supply," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 331-350.
    14. Magdeldin, Mohamed & Järvinen, Mika, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of Kraft black liquor: Process design, analysis, pulp mill integration and economic evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    15. Pirmohamadi, Alireza & Ghazi, Mehrangiz & Nikian, Mohammad, 2019. "Optimal design of cogeneration systems in total site using exergy approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1291-1302.
    16. Joelsson, J.M. & Gustavsson, L., 2008. "CO2 emission and oil use reduction through black liquor gasification and energy efficiency in pulp and paper industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 747-763.
    17. Díaz Pérez, Álvaro A. & Escobar Palacio, José C. & Venturini, Osvaldo J. & Martínez Reyes, Arnaldo M. & Rúa Orozco, Dimas J. & Silva Lora, Electo E. & Almazán del Olmo, Oscar A., 2018. "Thermodynamic and economic evaluation of reheat and regeneration alternatives in cogeneration systems of the Brazilian sugarcane and alcohol sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 247-262.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali, Ramadan Hefny & Abdel Samee, Ahmed A. & Maghrabie, Hussein M., 2023. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a cogeneration pulp and paper plant under bi-operating modes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    2. Zhuang, Wennan & Zhou, Suyang & Chen, Jinyi & Gu, Wei, 2024. "Operation optimization of electricity-steam coupled industrial energy system considering steam accumulator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josip Orović & Vedran Mrzljak & Igor Poljak, 2018. "Efficiency and Losses Analysis of Steam Air Heater from Marine Steam Propulsion Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Gao, Jintong & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Xiaozhuang & Song, Dayong & Liu, Weiqi & Liu, Wenchao, 2018. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses with modeling for CO2 allocation of coal-fired CHP plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 562-575.
    3. Laurijssen, Jobien & Marsidi, Marc & Westenbroek, Annita & Worrell, Ernst & Faaij, Andre, 2010. "Paper and biomass for energy?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1208-1218.
    4. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Ximei Li & Jianmin Gao & Yaning Zhang & Yu Zhang & Qian Du & Shaohua Wu & Yukun Qin, 2020. "Energy, Exergy and Economic Analyses of a Combined Heating and Power System with Turbine-Driving Fans and Pumps in Northeast China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Ibrahim, Thamir K. & Mohammed, Mohammed Kamil & Awad, Omar I. & Abdalla, Ahmed N. & Basrawi, Firdaus & Mohammed, Marwah N. & Najafi, G. & Mamat, Rizalman, 2018. "A comprehensive review on the exergy analysis of combined cycle power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 835-850.
    7. Fangyi Li & Zhaoyang Ye & Xilin Xiao & Dawei Ma, 2019. "Environmental Benefits of Stock Evolution of Coal-Fired Power Generators in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Silva, D.A.L. & Filleti, R.A.P. & Musule, R. & Matheus, T.T. & Freire, F., 2022. "A systematic review and life cycle assessment of biomass pellets and briquettes production in Latin America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Chepeliev, Maksym & Diachuk, Oleksandr & Podolets, Roman & Trypolska, Galyna, 2021. "The role of bioenergy in Ukraine's climate mitigation policy by 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    12. Janghorban Esfahani, Iman & Kang, Yong Tae & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2014. "A high efficient combined multi-effect evaporation–absorption heat pump and vapor-compression refrigeration part 1: Energy and economic modeling and analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 312-326.
    13. Charalampos Michalakakis & Jeremy Fouillou & Richard C. Lupton & Ana Gonzalez Hernandez & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "Calculating the chemical exergy of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 274-287, April.
    14. Teymouri, Matin & Sadeghi, Shayan & Moghimi, Mahdi & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2021. "3E analysis and optimization of an innovative cogeneration system based on biomass gasification and solar photovoltaic thermal plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. C, Alimonti & P, Conti & E, Soldo, 2019. "A comprehensive exergy evaluation of a deep borehole heat exchanger coupled with a ORC plant: the case study of Campi Flegrei," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    16. Singh, Pushpendra & Meena, Nand K. & Yang, Jin & Vega-Fuentes, Eduardo & Bishnoi, Shree Krishna, 2020. "Multi-criteria decision making monarch butterfly optimization for optimal distributed energy resources mix in distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    17. Gao, Lei & Cao, Tao & Hwang, Yunho & Radermacher, Reinhard, 2022. "Robustness analysis in supercritical CO2 power generation system configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    18. Baghsheikhi, Mostafa & Sayyaadi, Hoseyn, 2016. "Real-time exergoeconomic optimization of a steam power plant using a soft computing-fuzzy inference system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 868-884.
    19. Reddy, V. Siva & Kaushik, S.C. & Tyagi, S.K., 2012. "Exergetic analysis and performance evaluation of parabolic trough concentrating solar thermal power plant (PTCSTPP)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 258-273.
    20. Guo, Shenghui & Meng, Fanrui & Peng, Pai & Xu, Jialing & Jin, Hui & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of the superiority of the direct mass transfer design in the supercritical water gasification system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pe:s036054422202850x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.