IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v213y2020ics036054422031968x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic modelling of sandstorms affecting the optimal operation and cleaning scheduling of air coolers in concentrated solar power plants

Author

Listed:
  • Lozano-Santamaria, Federico
  • Luceño, José A.
  • Martín, Mariano
  • Macchietto, Sandro

Abstract

The operation performance of air-coolers in concentrated solar power plants decays due to particulate deposition on heat transfer surfaces. The deposition process can be seen as a stochastic phenomenon. A modelling approach is proposed to capture the uncertainty and the effect of extreme events, such as sandstorms, affecting the performance of plants located in dry places through dust or sand deposition on the air coolers. A case study of a concentrated solar power plant located in Dubai is analysed. Sandstorms generate acute and drastic fouling of the air coolers, and this is modelled as a stochastic process using historical aerosol dispersion data. Ten scenarios are generated by sampling the probability distribution of sandstorms occurrence and intensity. The optimal operation (cleaning schedule and airflow profiles) of the air coolers is established using Benders decomposition to solve the resulting large-scale mixed integer non-linear programming problem. The results of the stochastic scenarios demonstrate that substantial savings of $ 0.6 M − $ 2.7 M per year are achieved by the optimal operation. Cost is minimized by a combined reactive and proactive cleaning policy which accounts for the frequency, intensity and seasonal variability of sandstorms, in addition to the variability on local radiation and weather conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lozano-Santamaria, Federico & Luceño, José A. & Martín, Mariano & Macchietto, Sandro, 2020. "Stochastic modelling of sandstorms affecting the optimal operation and cleaning scheduling of air coolers in concentrated solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:213:y:2020:i:c:s036054422031968x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422031968X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barigozzi, G. & Perdichizzi, A. & Ravelli, S., 2011. "Wet and dry cooling systems optimization applied to a modern waste-to-energy cogeneration heat and power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1366-1376, April.
    2. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    3. Liu, Ming & Steven Tay, N.H. & Bell, Stuart & Belusko, Martin & Jacob, Rhys & Will, Geoffrey & Saman, Wasim & Bruno, Frank, 2016. "Review on concentrating solar power plants and new developments in high temperature thermal energy storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1411-1432.
    4. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Zhai, Haibo & Rubin, Edward S., 2010. "Performance and cost of wet and dry cooling systems for pulverized coal power plants with and without carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5653-5660, October.
    6. Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M. & Victoria Sanchez-Henríquez, M. & Peña-Quintana, Juan A., 2011. "Exergetic comparison of two different cooling technologies for the power cycle of a thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1966-1972.
    7. de la Calle, Alberto & Bayon, Alicia & Soo Too, Yen Chean, 2018. "Impact of ambient temperature on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle in arid locations: Finding the optimal design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1016-1027.
    8. Manassaldi, Juan I. & Scenna, Nicolás J. & Mussati, Sergio F., 2014. "Optimization mathematical model for the detailed design of air cooled heat exchangers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 734-746.
    9. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martín, Mariano, 2015. "Optimal annual operation of the dry cooling system of a concentrated solar energy plant in the south of Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 774-782.
    2. Luceño, José A. & Martín, Mariano, 2018. "Two-step optimization procedure for the conceptual design of A-frame systems for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 483-500.
    3. Xu, Zhen & Liu, Xinxin & Xie, Yingchun, 2023. "Off-design performances of a dry-cooled supercritical recompression Brayton cycle using CO2–H2S as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Analysis for flexible operation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with solar thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 752-771.
    6. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    7. Paul Tafur-Escanta & Robert Valencia-Chapi & Ignacio López-Paniagua & Luis Coco-Enríquez & Javier Muñoz-Antón, 2021. "Supercritical CO 2 Binary Mixtures for Recompression Brayton s-CO 2 Power Cycles Coupled to Solar Thermal Energy Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Ma, Yuegeng & Morozyuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2019. "Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1134-1154.
    10. Martín, Mariano & Martín, Mónica, 2017. "Cooling limitations in power plants: Optimal multiperiod design of natural draft cooling towers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 625-636.
    11. Cheng, Kunlin & Qin, Jiang & Sun, Hongchuang & Li, Heng & He, Shuai & Zhang, Silong & Bao, Wen, 2019. "Power optimization and comparison between simple recuperated and recompressing supercritical carbon dioxide Closed-Brayton-Cycle with finite cold source on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1189-1201.
    12. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    13. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Xuwei & Qiao, Yongqiang & Zhang, Chun & Gao, Wei & Yao, Mingyu, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2–SF6 mixture working fluid supercritical Brayton cycle used for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    14. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    15. Cheng, Kunlin & Qin, Jiang & Zhang, Duo & Bao, Wen & Jing, Wuxing, 2022. "Performance evaluation for a combined power generation system of closed-Brayton-cycle and thermoelectric generator with finite cold source at room temperature on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    16. Cheng, Kunlin & Li, Jiahui & Yu, Jianchi & Fu, Chuanjie & Qin, Jiang & Jing, Wuxing, 2023. "Novel thermoelectric generator enhanced supercritical carbon dioxide closed-Brayton-cycle power generation systems: Performance comparison and configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    17. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    18. Zhao, Yu & Chang, Zhiyuan & Zhao, Yuanyang & Yang, Qichao & Liu, Guangbin & Li, Liansheng, 2023. "Performance comparison of three supercritical CO2 solar thermal power systems with compressed fluid and molten salt energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    19. Wang, Di & Han, Xinrui & Li, Haoyu & Li, Xiaoli, 2023. "Dynamic simulation and parameter analysis of solar-coal hybrid power plant based on the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    20. Cheng, Kunlin & Yu, Jianchi & Dang, Chaolei & Qin, Jiang & Jing, Wuxing, 2024. "Performance comparison between closed-Brayton-cycle power generation systems using supercritical carbon dioxide and helium–xenon mixture at ultra-high turbine inlet temperatures on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:213:y:2020:i:c:s036054422031968x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.