IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v36y2011i4p1966-1972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergetic comparison of two different cooling technologies for the power cycle of a thermal power plant

Author

Listed:
  • Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M.
  • Victoria Sanchez-Henríquez, M.
  • Peña-Quintana, Juan A.

Abstract

Exergetic analysis is without any doubt a powerful tool for developing, evaluating and improving an energy conversion system. In the present paper, two different cooling technologies for the power cycle of a 50MWe solar thermal power plant are compared from the exergetic viewpoint. The Rankine cycle design is a conventional, single reheat design with five closed and one open extraction feedwater heaters. The software package GateCycle is used for the thermodynamic simulation of the Rankine cycle model. The first design configuration uses a cooling tower while the second configuration uses an air cooled condenser. With this exergy analysis we identify the location, magnitude and the sources or thermodynamic inefficiencies in this thermal system. This information is very useful for improving the overall efficiency of the power system and for comparing the performance of both technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M. & Victoria Sanchez-Henríquez, M. & Peña-Quintana, Juan A., 2011. "Exergetic comparison of two different cooling technologies for the power cycle of a thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1966-1972.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:4:p:1966-1972
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544210005128
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gupta, M.K. & Kaushik, S.C., 2010. "Exergy analysis and investigation for various feed water heaters of direct steam generation solar–thermal power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1228-1235.
    2. Habib, M.A. & Zubair, S.M., 1992. "Second-law-based thermodynamic analysis of regenerative-reheat Rankine-cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 295-301.
    3. Singh, Narendra & Kaushik, S.C. & Misra, R.D., 2000. "Exergetic analysis of a solar thermal power system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 135-143.
    4. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    5. Tsatsaronis, Georgios & Winhold, Michael, 1985. "Exergoeconomic analysis and evaluation of energy-conversion plants—II. Analysis of a coal-fired steam power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 81-94.
    6. Kwak, H.-Y. & Kim, D.-J. & Jeon, J.-S., 2003. "Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 343-360.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martín, Mariano, 2015. "Optimal annual operation of the dry cooling system of a concentrated solar energy plant in the south of Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 774-782.
    2. Mert, Mehmet Selçuk & Dilmaç, Ömer Faruk & Özkan, Semra & Karaca, Fatma & Bolat, Esen, 2012. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration plant in an iron and steel factory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 78-84.
    3. Martín, Mariano & Martín, Mónica, 2017. "Cooling limitations in power plants: Optimal multiperiod design of natural draft cooling towers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 625-636.
    4. Huang, Haodong & Lin, Meng, 2021. "Optimization of solar receivers for high-temperature solar conversion processes: Direct vs. Indirect illumination designs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    5. Tarun Kumar Aseri & Chandan Sharma & Tara C. Kandpal, 2022. "Condenser cooling technologies for concentrating solar power plants: a review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 4511-4565, April.
    6. Janghorban Esfahani, I. & Yoo, C.K., 2013. "Exergy analysis and parametric optimization of three power and fresh water cogeneration systems using refrigeration chillers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 340-355.
    7. Reddy, V. Siva & Kaushik, S.C. & Tyagi, S.K., 2012. "Exergetic analysis and performance evaluation of parabolic trough concentrating solar thermal power plant (PTCSTPP)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 258-273.
    8. Le Roux, W.G. & Bello-Ochende, T. & Meyer, J.P., 2011. "Operating conditions of an open and direct solar thermal Brayton cycle with optimised cavity receiver and recuperator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6027-6036.
    9. Palenzuela, Patricia & Zaragoza, Guillermo & Alarcón-Padilla, Diego-César, 2015. "Characterisation of the coupling of multi-effect distillation plants to concentrating solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 986-995.
    10. Ziya Sogut, M., 2012. "Exergetic and environmental assessment of room air conditioners in Turkish market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 32-41.
    11. Moore, J. & Grimes, R. & Walsh, E. & O'Donovan, A., 2014. "Modelling the thermodynamic performance of a concentrated solar power plant with a novel modular air-cooled condenser," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 378-391.
    12. Aseri, Tarun Kumar & Sharma, Chandan & Kandpal, Tara C., 2021. "Estimation of capital costs and techno-economic appraisal of parabolic trough solar collector and solar power tower based CSP plants in India for different condenser cooling options," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 344-362.
    13. Lozano-Santamaria, Federico & Luceño, José A. & Martín, Mariano & Macchietto, Sandro, 2020. "Stochastic modelling of sandstorms affecting the optimal operation and cleaning scheduling of air coolers in concentrated solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Luceño, José A. & Martín, Mariano, 2018. "Two-step optimization procedure for the conceptual design of A-frame systems for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 483-500.
    15. Luca Cirillo & Adriana Greco & Claudia Masselli, 2023. "A Solid-to-Solid 2D Model of a Magnetocaloric Cooler with Thermal Diodes: A Sustainable Way for Refrigerating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Faisal Asfand & Patricia Palenzuela & Lidia Roca & Adèle Caron & Charles-André Lemarié & Jon Gillard & Peter Turner & Kumar Patchigolla, 2020. "Thermodynamic Performance and Water Consumption of Hybrid Cooling System Configurations for Concentrated Solar Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Palenzuela, Patricia & Roca, Lidia & Asfand, Faisal & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2022. "Experimental assessment of a pilot scale hybrid cooling system for water consumption reduction in CSP plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    2. Abusoglu, Aysegul & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2009. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2295-2308, December.
    3. Gupta, M.K. & Kaushik, S.C. & Ranjan, K.R. & Panwar, N.L. & Reddy, V. Siva & Tyagi, S.K., 2015. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of solar and other thermal power generation systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 567-582.
    4. Giglio, Andrea & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi & Rodríguez García, Margarita M. & Zarza Moya, Eduardo, 2017. "Direct steam generation in parabolic-trough collectors: A review about the technology and a thermo-economic analysis of a hybrid system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 453-473.
    5. Coban, Kahraman & Şöhret, Yasin & Colpan, C. Ozgur & Karakoç, T. Hikmet, 2017. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic assessment of a small-scale turbojet fuelled with biodiesel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P2), pages 1358-1367.
    6. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    7. César Torres & Antonio Valero, 2021. "The Exergy Cost Theory Revisited," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-42, March.
    8. Piacentino, Antonio & Cardona, Fabio, 2010. "Scope-Oriented Thermoeconomic analysis of energy systems. Part I: Looking for a non-postulated cost accounting for the dissipative devices of a vapour compression chiller. Is it feasible?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 943-956, March.
    9. Ranjan, K.R. & Kaushik, S.C., 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic feasibility of solar ponds for various thermal applications: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 123-139.
    10. Seyyedi, Seyyed Masoud & Ajam, Hossein & Farahat, Said, 2010. "A new criterion for the allocation of residues cost in exergoeconomic analysis of energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3474-3482.
    11. Manassaldi, Juan I. & Mussati, Sergio F. & Scenna, Nicolás J., 2011. "Optimal synthesis and design of Heat Recovery Steam Generation (HRSG) via mathematical programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 475-485.
    12. Hofmann, Mathias & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Comparative exergoeconomic assessment of coal-fired power plants – Binary Rankine cycle versus conventional steam cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 168-179.
    13. Siva Reddy, V. & Kaushik, S.C. & Ranjan, K.R. & Tyagi, S.K., 2013. "State-of-the-art of solar thermal power plants—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 258-273.
    14. Gupta, M.K. & Kaushik, S.C., 2010. "Exergy analysis and investigation for various feed water heaters of direct steam generation solar–thermal power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1228-1235.
    15. Yang, Qingchun & Qian, Yu & Kraslawski, Andrzej & Zhou, Huairong & Yang, Siyu, 2016. "Framework for advanced exergoeconomic performance analysis and optimization of an oil shale retorting process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 62-76.
    16. Ligang Wang & Yongping Yang & Changqing Dong & Zhiping Yang & Gang Xu & Lingnan Wu, 2012. "Exergoeconomic Evaluation of a Modern Ultra-Supercritical Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Ligang Wang & Zhiping Yang & Shivom Sharma & Alberto Mian & Tzu-En Lin & George Tsatsaronis & François Maréchal & Yongping Yang, 2018. "A Review of Evaluation, Optimization and Synthesis of Energy Systems: Methodology and Application to Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-53, December.
    18. Haydargil, Derya & Abuşoğlu, Ayşegül, 2018. "A comparative thermoeconomic cost accounting analysis and evaluation of biogas engine-powered cogeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 97-114.
    19. Iribarren, Diego & Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Dufour, Javier, 2013. "Environmental and thermodynamic evaluation of CO2 capture, transport and storage with and without enhanced resource recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 477-485.
    20. Calise, F. & Dentice d'Accadia, M. & Piacentino, A., 2015. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of a renewable polygeneration system and viability study for small isolated communities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 290-307.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:4:p:1966-1972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.