IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v128y2017icp101-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergy analysis of three alternative carbon dioxide capture processes

Author

Listed:
  • Nimmanterdwong, Prathana
  • Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon
  • Piumsomboon, Pornpote

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture technologies have increased in importance recently due to high CO2 emission levels, principally from fossil fuel power generation to support increasing global energy demand. In this study, emergy accounting was applied to quantify the utilization of resources and compare process performance, in terms of sustainability, of three alternative CO2 capture technologies (chemical absorption, solid adsorption and membrane separation) selected from the representative literature. The natural investment or unit emergy value (UEV) of each process was evaluated in units of sej/kg. The results revealed that the lowest to highest UEVs were solid adsorption, membrane separation and amine absorption, respectively. Thus, the most preferable choice for CO2 capture among these three approaches was solid-based adsorption, since it consumed the lowest level of natural resources. Moreover, the UEV of the solid-based adsorption process can be lowered by improving and optimizing the heat utilization within the system and replacing the non-renewable sources of heat and power with renewable resources. In addition, the emergy analysis also provided suggestions for improving membrane separation and amine absorption processes. For amine absorption, improving solvent regeneration efficiency would reduce natural gas consumption, while for membrane separation, power sources should be switched to renewable resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Nimmanterdwong, Prathana & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Piumsomboon, Pornpote, 2017. "Emergy analysis of three alternative carbon dioxide capture processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 101-108.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:128:y:2017:i:c:p:101-108
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217305480
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pang, Mingyue & Zhang, Lixiao & Ulgiati, Sergio & Wang, Changbo, 2015. "Ecological impacts of small hydropower in China: Insights from an emergy analysis of a case plant," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 112-122.
    2. Campbell, Elliott T., 2015. "Emergy analysis of emerging methods of fossil fuel production," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 57-68.
    3. Brown, Mark T. & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2016. "Emergy assessment of global renewable sources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 339(C), pages 148-156.
    4. Perevertaylenko, Olexander Yu. & Gariev, Andriy O. & Damartzis, Theodoros & Tovazhnyanskyy, Leonid L. & Kapustenko, Petro O. & Arsenyeva, Olga P., 2015. "Searches of cost effective ways for amine absorption unit design in CO2 post-combustion capture process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 105-112.
    5. Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Qingling & Ji, Na & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Jun & Li, Yang & Kitamura, Yutaka, 2017. "Reducing the energy consumption of membrane-cryogenic hybrid CO2 capture by process optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 29-39.
    6. Franz, Johannes & Maas, Pascal & Scherer, Viktor, 2014. "Economic evaluation of pre-combustion CO2-capture in IGCC power plants by porous ceramic membranes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 532-542.
    7. Feng, Xiao & Wang, Li & Min, Shuling, 2009. "Industrial emergy evaluation for hydrogen production systems from biomass and natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1767-1773, September.
    8. Jayakumar, Abhimanyu & Gomez, Arturo & Mahinpey, Nader, 2016. "Post-combustion CO2 capture using solid K2CO3: Discovering the carbonation reaction mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 531-543.
    9. Campanari, S. & Chiesa, P. & Manzolini, G. & Bedogni, S., 2014. "Economic analysis of CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycles using Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 562-573.
    10. Ghisellini, Patrizia & Zucaro, Amalia & Viglia, Silvio & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2014. "Monitoring and evaluating the sustainability of Italian agricultural system. An emergy decomposition analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 132-148.
    11. Buonocore, Elvira & Vanoli, Laura & Carotenuto, Alberto & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2015. "Integrating life cycle assessment and emergy synthesis for the evaluation of a dry steam geothermal power plant in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 476-487.
    12. Lacarrière, Bruno & Deutz, Kévin Ruben & Jamali-Zghal, Nadia & Le Corre, Olivier, 2015. "Emergy assessment of the benefits of closed-loop recycling accounting for material losses," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 77-87.
    13. Ferraro, D.O. & Benzi, P., 2015. "A long-term sustainability assessment of an Argentinian agricultural system based on emergy synthesis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 121-129.
    14. J. W. Owens, 1997. "Life‐Cycle Assessment: Constraints on Moving from Inventory to Impact Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 1(1), pages 37-49, January.
    15. Brown, Mark T. & Protano, Gaetano & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2011. "Assessing geobiosphere work of generating global reserves of coal, crude oil, and natural gas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 879-887.
    16. Plaza, M.G. & González, A.S. & Pevida, C. & Pis, J.J. & Rubiera, F., 2012. "Valorisation of spent coffee grounds as CO2 adsorbents for postcombustion capture applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 272-279.
    17. Valverde, J.M. & Raganati, F. & Quintanilla, M.A.S. & Ebri, J.M.P. & Ammendola, P. & Chirone, R., 2013. "Enhancement of CO2 capture at Ca-looping conditions by high-intensity acoustic fields," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 538-549.
    18. Manzolini, G. & Sanchez Fernandez, E. & Rezvani, S. & Macchi, E. & Goetheer, E.L.V. & Vlugt, T.J.H., 2015. "Economic assessment of novel amine based CO2 capture technologies integrated in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 546-558.
    19. Takahashi, Tomoki & Sato, Toru, 2015. "Inclusive environmental impact assessment indices with consideration of public acceptance: Application to power generation technologies in Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 64-72.
    20. Lu, Jian-Gang & Lu, Chun-Ting & Chen, Yue & Gao, Liu & Zhao, Xin & Zhang, Hui & Xu, Zheng-Wen, 2014. "CO2 capture by membrane absorption coupling process: Application of ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 573-581.
    21. Felix, Erika & Tilley, David R., 2009. "Integrated energy, environmental and financial analysis of ethanol production from cellulosic switchgrass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 410-436.
    22. Sims, Ralph E. H. & Rogner, Hans-Holger & Gregory, Ken, 2003. "Carbon emission and mitigation cost comparisons between fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable energy resources for electricity generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(13), pages 1315-1326, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Xiang, Qing & Pan, Hengyu & Ma, Xiaohan & Yang, Mingdong & Lyu, Yanfeng & Zhang, Xiaohong & Shui, Wei & Liao, Wenjie & Xiao, Yinlong & Wu, Jun & Zhang, Yanzong & Xu, Min, 2024. "Impacts of energy-saving and emission-reduction on sustainability of cement production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Tao Li & Yimiao Song & Jing Shen, 2019. "Clean Power Dispatching of Coal-Fired Power Generation in China Based on the Production Cleanliness Evaluation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Zhang, Rui & Yang, Qi & Yu, Bing & Yu, Hai & Liang, Zhiwu, 2018. "Toward to efficient CO2 capture solvent design by analyzing the effect of substituent type connected to N-atom," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1064-1072.
    5. Mahshad Modiri & Atiye Haj Hasan & Hamid Zafari koloukhi & Fatemeh Rostami & Seyyed Mohammad Tafazzoli & Akram Avami, 2023. "Assessment of water-energy-emissions nexus in wastewater treatment plants using emergy analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11905-11929, October.
    6. Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Suleman & Ihtishamul Haq & Syed Asad Jamal, 2018. "Post‐combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption and hybrid system: current status and challenges," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 998-1031, December.
    7. Trobajo, J.R. & Antuña-Nieto, C. & Rodríguez, E. & García, R. & López-Antón, M.A. & Martínez-Tarazona, M.R., 2018. "Carbon-based sorbents impregnated with iron oxides for removing mercury in energy generation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 648-655.
    8. Li, Xiangyu & Wang, Zhiqing & Liu, Zheyu & Feng, Ru & Song, Shuangshuang & Huang, Jiejie & Fang, Yitian, 2022. "A novel preparation of solid amine sorbents for enhancing CO2 adsorption capacity using alumina-extracted waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    9. Antuña-Nieto, C. & Rodríguez, E. & Lopez-Anton, M.A. & García, R. & Martínez-Tarazona, M.R., 2018. "A candidate material for mercury control in energy production processes: Carbon foams loaded with gold," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 630-637.
    10. Wawrzyńczak, Dariusz & Panowski, Marcin & Majchrzak-Kucęba, Izabela, 2019. "Possibilities of CO2 purification coming from oxy-combustion for enhanced oil recovery and storage purposes by adsorption method on activated carbon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 787-796.
    11. Nimmanterdwong, Prathana & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Piumsomboon, Pornpote, 2023. "Optimizing utilization pathways for biomass to chemicals and energy by integrating emergy analysis and particle swarm optimization (PSO)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1448-1459.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajun Wan & Xiaolei Qi & Weidong Yue & Runqiu Tu, 2022. "Construction and case verification of rural environmental value-added evaluation system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1781-1797, February.
    2. Ajun Wan & Runqiu Tu & Weidong Yue & Yixuan Liu & Yunpeng Wu, 2021. "Construction and case study of rural environmental value-added evaluation system based on emergy theory," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4715-4734, March.
    3. Chen, Wei & Liu, Wenjing & Geng, Yong & Brown, Mark T. & Gao, Cuixia & Wu, Rui, 2017. "Recent progress on emergy research: A bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1051-1060.
    4. Theo, Wai Lip & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Hashim, Haslenda & Mustaffa, Azizul Azri & Ho, Wai Shin, 2016. "Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1633-1663.
    5. Shah, Syed Mahboob & Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Qing & Casazza, Marco & Agostinho, Feni & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2021. "Sustainability assessment of agriculture production systems in Pakistan: A provincial-scale energy-based evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    6. Maione, A. & Massarotti, N. & Santagata, R. & Ulgiati, S. & Vanoli, L., 2023. "Integrated environmental accounting of a geothermal grid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Beibei Guo & Tingting Cheng & Tingting Sun & Yi Tong & Sifeng Nian, 2024. "Identifying the Complexity of the Food-Energy-Water Nexus Based on Emergy Analysis in Crop Production Systems of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Baral, Nawa Raj & Wituszynski, David M. & Martin, Jay F. & Shah, Ajay, 2016. "Sustainability assessment of cellulosic biorefinery stillage utilization methods using emergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 13-28.
    9. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    10. Cristiano, S. & Ulgiati, S. & Gonella, F., 2021. "Systemic sustainability and resilience assessment of health systems, addressing global societal priorities: Learnings from a top nonprofit hospital in a bioclimatic building in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Xiaocui Dong & Hongguang Liu, 2023. "Sustainable evaluation of agroecosystem in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China based on the Emergy Theory," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 13471-13494, November.
    12. Zhong, Weiqiong & An, Haizhong & Shen, Lei & Fang, Wei & Gao, Xiangyun & Dong, Di, 2017. "The roles of countries in the international fossil fuel trade: An emergy and network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 365-376.
    13. Wright, Christina & Østergård, Hanne, 2015. "Scales of renewability exemplified by a case study of three Danish pig production systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 28-36.
    14. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2016. "Emergy-based sustainability evaluation of wind power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 239-246.
    15. Sun, Yufeng & Yang, Bin & Wang, Yapeng & Zheng, Zipeng & Wang, Jinwei & Yue, Yaping & Mu, Wenlong & Xu, Guangyin & Jilai Ying,, 2023. "Emergy evaluation of biogas production system in China from perspective of collection radius," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    16. Duian Lu & Jie Cheng & Zhenzhou Feng & Li Sun & Wei Mo & Degang Wang, 2022. "Emergy Synthesis of Two Oyster Aquaculture Systems in Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Agostinho, Feni & Bertaglia, Ana B.B. & Almeida, Cecília M.V.B. & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2015. "Influence of cellulase enzyme production on the energetic–environmental performance of lignocellulosic ethanol," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 46-56.
    18. Hamidreza Shahhoseini & Mahmoud Ramroudi & Hossein Kazemi, 2023. "Emergy analysis for sustainability assessment of potato agroecosystems (case study: Golestan province, Iran)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6393-6418, July.
    19. Miguel Angel Avalos-Rangel & Daniel E. Campbell & Delfino Reyes-López & Rolando Rueda-Luna & Ricardo Munguía-Pérez & Manuel Huerta-Lara, 2021. "The Environmental-Economic Performance of a Poblano Family Milpa System: An Emergy Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Jia He & Yi Li & Lianjun Zhang & Junyin Tan & Chuanhao Wen, 2021. "A County-Scale Spillover Ecological Value Compensation Standard of Ecological Barrier Area in China: Based on an Extended Emergy Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:128:y:2017:i:c:p:101-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.