IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v265y2023ics0360544222032637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergy evaluation of biogas production system in China from perspective of collection radius

Author

Listed:
  • Sun, Yufeng
  • Yang, Bin
  • Wang, Yapeng
  • Zheng, Zipeng
  • Wang, Jinwei
  • Yue, Yaping
  • Mu, Wenlong
  • Xu, Guangyin
  • Jilai Ying,

Abstract

Biogas production has become one of the main renewable energy utilization modes in Chinese rural areas. In this study, emergy theory was employed to assess the ecological sustainability of biogas production system based on the case of Weilai energy company. Emergy radius formulas derived from biogas production characteristics were constructed to illustrate the relationship between the degree of system development and biomass supply distance. The calculated emergy results showed that the biogas production system required an average of 1.98 E+14sej emergy inputs in the process of utilizing one-ton agricultural waste. And the emergy indicators implied that the system had a low degree of social resource input and environmental loading, indicating that the system could keep high output efficiency and ecological sustainability. The biomass recycling distance (9.93 km) which was calculated from emergy radius demonstrated better ecological performance and higher waste utilization degree than that of economic recycling distance (7.57 km). Biomass recycling distance based on emergy theory would provide a comprehensive understanding for the biogas production development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun, Yufeng & Yang, Bin & Wang, Yapeng & Zheng, Zipeng & Wang, Jinwei & Yue, Yaping & Mu, Wenlong & Xu, Guangyin & Jilai Ying,, 2023. "Emergy evaluation of biogas production system in China from perspective of collection radius," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:265:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222032637
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222032637
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stančin, H. & Mikulčić, H. & Wang, X. & Duić, N., 2020. "A review on alternative fuels in future energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Lovrak, Ana & Pukšec, Tomislav & Grozdek, Marino & Duić, Neven, 2022. "An integrated Geographical Information System (GIS) approach for assessing seasonal variation and spatial distribution of biogas potential from industrial residues and by-products," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    3. Brown, Mark T. & Protano, Gaetano & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2011. "Assessing geobiosphere work of generating global reserves of coal, crude oil, and natural gas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 879-887.
    4. Skovsgaard, Lise & Jacobsen, Henrik Klinge, 2017. "Economies of scale in biogas production and the significance of flexible regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 77-89.
    5. Brown, Mark T. & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2010. "Updated evaluation of exergy and emergy driving the geobiosphere: A review and refinement of the emergy baseline," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(20), pages 2501-2508.
    6. Aggarwal, R.K. & Chandel, Shyam Singh & Yadav, Priya & Khosla, Atul, 2021. "Perspective of new innovative biogas technology policy implementation for sustainable development in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Zhang, Dahai & Wang, Jiaqi & Lin, Yonggang & Si, Yulin & Huang, Can & Yang, Jing & Huang, Bin & Li, Wei, 2017. "Present situation and future prospect of renewable energy in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 865-871.
    8. Brown, Mark T. & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2016. "Emergy assessment of global renewable sources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 339(C), pages 148-156.
    9. Aravani, Vasiliki P. & Sun, Hangyu & Yang, Ziyi & Liu, Guangqing & Wang, Wen & Anagnostopoulos, George & Syriopoulos, George & Charisiou, Nikolaos D. & Goula, Maria A. & Kornaros, Michael & Papadakis,, 2022. "Agricultural and livestock sector's residues in Greece & China: Comparative qualitative and quantitative characterization for assessing their potential for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Zhang, Binyue & Chen, Bin, 2017. "Sustainability accounting of a household biogas project based on emergy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 819-831.
    11. Sun, Yufeng & Cai, Wenchao & Chen, Bo & Guo, Xueying & Hu, Jianjun & Jiao, Youzhou, 2017. "Economic analysis of fuel collection, storage, and transportation in straw power generation in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 194-203.
    12. Höhn, J. & Lehtonen, E. & Rasi, S. & Rintala, J., 2014. "A Geographical Information System (GIS) based methodology for determination of potential biomasses and sites for biogas plants in southern Finland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-10.
    13. Gao, Mingxue & Wang, Danmeng & Wang, Hui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Feng, Yongzhong, 2019. "Biogas potential, utilization and countermeasures in agricultural provinces: A case study of biogas development in Henan Province, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 191-200.
    14. Ramírez-Arpide, Félix Rafael & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro & Gallegos-Vázquez, Clemente & Santoyo-Cortés, Vinicio Horacio, 2019. "Bioenergy production from nopal cladodes and dairy cow manure on a farm-scale level: Challenges for its economic feasibility in Mexico," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 383-392.
    15. Gustafsson, M. & Anderberg, S., 2021. "Dimensions and characteristics of biogas policies – Modelling the European policy landscape," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    16. Sun, Yufeng & Wang, Yapeng & Yang, Bin & Zheng, Zipeng & Wang, Chun & Chen, Bo & Li, Suiliang & Ying, Jilai & Liu, Xinping & Chen, Liang & Mu, Wenlong, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of straw collection, transportation and storage system for power generation in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Mattias, Gaglio & Elena, Tamburini & Giuseppe, Castaldelli & Anna, Fano Elisa, 2021. "Modeling the ecosystem service of agricultural residues provision for bioenergy production: A potential application in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 451(C).
    18. Roni, Mohammad S. & Thompson, David N. & Hartley, Damon S., 2019. "Distributed biomass supply chain cost optimization to evaluate multiple feedstocks for a biorefinery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    19. Wang, Xiaolong & Li, Zhejin & Long, Pan & Yan, Lingling & Gao, Wangsheng & Chen, Yuanquan & Sui, Peng, 2017. "Sustainability evaluation of recycling in agricultural systems by emergy accounting," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 114-124.
    20. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    21. Ng, Rex T.L. & Maravelias, Christos T., 2017. "Economic and energetic analysis of biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1571-1582.
    22. Zhao, Xin-gang & Li, Ang, 2016. "A multi-objective sustainable location model for biomass power plants: Case of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1184-1193.
    23. Bertilsson, Göte O.B. & Kirchmann, Holger, 2021. "Sustainable N fertilizer production based on a loop: Straw - biogas – ‘Haber-Bosch’ process," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    24. Gital Durmaz, Yeşim & Bilgen, Bilge, 2020. "Multi-objective optimization of sustainable biomass supply chain network design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    25. Wu, Xihui & Wu, Faqi & Tong, Xiaogang & Wu, Jia & Sun, Lu & Peng, Xiaoyu, 2015. "Emergy and greenhouse gas assessment of a sustainable, integrated agricultural model (SIAM) for plant, animal and biogas production: Analysis of the ecological recycle of wastes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 40-50.
    26. Cooper, Nathanial & Panteli, Anna & Shah, Nilay, 2019. "Linear estimators of biomass yield maps for improved biomass supply chain optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    27. Lönnqvist, Tomas & Anderberg, Stefan & Ammenberg, Jonas & Sandberg, Thomas & Grönkvist, Stefan, 2019. "Stimulating biogas in the transport sector in a Swedish region – An actor and policy analysis with supply side focus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    28. Fernández-Puratich, Harald & Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo & Hernández, Diógenes & Gómez-Lagos, Javier E. & Armengot-Carbo, Bruno & Oliver-Villanueva, José Vicente, 2021. "Bi-objective optimization of multiple agro-industrial wastes supply to a cogeneration system promoting local circular bioeconomy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Jian-Xin & Tan, Xianchun & Gu, Baihe & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2022. "Integration of supply chain management of hybrid biomass power plant with carbon capture and storage operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1055-1065.
    2. Duian Lu & Jie Cheng & Zhenzhou Feng & Li Sun & Wei Mo & Degang Wang, 2022. "Emergy Synthesis of Two Oyster Aquaculture Systems in Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Lyu, Yanfeng & Raugei, Marco & Zhang, Xiaohong & Mellino, Salvatore & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2021. "Environmental cost and impacts of chemicals used in agriculture: An integration of emergy and Life Cycle Assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Lou, Bo & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2013. "Identifying the environmental support and constraints to the Chinese economic growth—An application of the Emergy Accounting method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 217-233.
    5. Wang, Saige & Cao, Tao & Chen, Bin, 2017. "Urban energy–water nexus based on modified input–output analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 208-217.
    6. Zhang, Shuai & Lei, Qingyu & Wu, Le & Wang, Yuqi & Zheng, Lan & Chen, Xi, 2022. "Supply chain design and integration for the Co-Processing of bio-oil and vacuum gas oil in a refinery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    7. Siegrist, Armin & Bowman, Gillianne & Burg, Vanessa, 2022. "Energy generation potentials from agricultural residues: The influence of techno-spatial restrictions on biomethane, electricity, and heat production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    8. Tan, Kangming & Li, Yuliang & Chen, Yun & Liu, Fangdan & Ou, Jingmin & Zhang, Yuhan & Wang, Xiaolong, 2022. "Modified framework to reflect contribution of soil storage in emergy synthesis under different agricultural practices at farm level," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    9. Maryam Roudneshin & Amanda Sosa, 2024. "Optimising Agricultural Waste Supply Chains for Sustainable Bioenergy Production: A Comprehensive Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Yu Zhao & Miao Yu & Yinghui Xiang & Chunguang Chang, 2023. "An approach to stimulate the sustainability of an eco-industrial park using coupled emergy and system dynamics," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11531-11556, October.
    11. Zhang, Zilong & Chen, Xingpeng & Heck, Peter & Xue, Bing & Liu, Ye, 2015. "Empirical study on the environmental pressure versus economic growth in China during 1991–2012," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 182-193.
    12. Nikodinoska, Natasha & Buonocore, Elvira & Paletto, Alessandro & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2017. "Wood-based bioenergy value chain in mountain urban districts: An integrated environmental accounting framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 197-210.
    13. Yue, Qiong & Guo, Ping & Wu, Hui & Wang, Youzhi & Zhang, Chenglong, 2022. "Towards sustainable circular agriculture: An integrated optimization framework for crop-livestock-biogas-crop recycling system management under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    14. Agostinho, Feni & Bertaglia, Ana B.B. & Almeida, Cecília M.V.B. & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2015. "Influence of cellulase enzyme production on the energetic–environmental performance of lignocellulosic ethanol," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 46-56.
    15. Kheybari, Siamak & Kazemi, Mostafa & Rezaei, Jafar, 2019. "Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 612-623.
    16. Ramos-Hernández, Rocío & Sánchez-Ramírez, Cuauhtémoc & Mota-López, Dulce Rocio & Sandoval-Salas, Fabiola & García-Alcaraz, Jorge Luis, 2021. "Evaluation of bioenergy potential from coffee pulp trough System Dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 863-877.
    17. Zhang, XiaoHong & Hu, He & Zhang, Rong & Deng, ShiHuai, 2014. "Interactions between China׳s economy, energy and the air emissions and their policy implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 624-638.
    18. Shahbazbegian, Vahid & Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi & Haeri, Abdorrahman, 2020. "Integrated forward/reverse logistics thin-film photovoltaic power plant supply chain network design with uncertain data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    19. Wang, Zhanwu & Wang, Zhenfeng & Tahir, Nadeem & Wang, Heng & Li, Jin & Xu, Guangyin, 2020. "Study of synergetic development in straw power supply chain: Straw price and government subsidy as incentive," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    20. Miguel Angel Avalos-Rangel & Daniel E. Campbell & Delfino Reyes-López & Rolando Rueda-Luna & Ricardo Munguía-Pérez & Manuel Huerta-Lara, 2021. "The Environmental-Economic Performance of a Poblano Family Milpa System: An Emergy Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:265:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222032637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.