IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v138y2015icp546-558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic assessment of novel amine based CO2 capture technologies integrated in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Manzolini, G.
  • Sanchez Fernandez, E.
  • Rezvani, S.
  • Macchi, E.
  • Goetheer, E.L.V.
  • Vlugt, T.J.H.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to assess the economic advantages of an innovative solvent for CO2 capture on state-of-the-art solvents. The CESAR-1 solvent, which is an aqueous solution of 2-amino-2-methyl-propanol (AMP) and piperazine (PZ), is applied both to advanced supercritical pulverised (ASC) coal and natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture units. The methodology includes process model developments using commercial simulation programs, which determine the thermodynamic properties of the selected power plants and the performance of the CO2 capture units. The results show that the techno-economic benefit of CESAR-1 versus MEA is more significant for ASC than that for NGCC due to a higher concentration of CO2 in the flue gas. This follows from the fact that the switch from MEA to CESAR-1 solvents reduces the electricity cost by 4.16€/MWh in the case of the ASC plant compared to 0.67€/MWh in connection with the proposed NGCC plant. Based on the above figures, we can conclude that CESAR-1 reduces the cost of CO2 avoided compared to MEA by 6€/t CO2 and 2€/t CO2 for the selected ASC and NGCC plants respectively. In view of that, the techno-economics can be improved if the CO2 capture plant is designed to operate using the CESAR-1 absorption technology due to a reduction in the regeneration energy and the solvent recirculation rate (considering its higher CO2 net capacity). However, the variable costs of running the capture plant are higher for the CESAR-1 solvent due to the higher cost of the amines.

Suggested Citation

  • Manzolini, G. & Sanchez Fernandez, E. & Rezvani, S. & Macchi, E. & Goetheer, E.L.V. & Vlugt, T.J.H., 2015. "Economic assessment of novel amine based CO2 capture technologies integrated in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 546-558.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:138:y:2015:i:c:p:546-558
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191400419X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Bin & Xu, Shisen & Gao, Shiwang & Liu, Lianbo & Tao, Jiye & Niu, Hongwei & Cai, Ming & Cheng, Jian, 2010. "Industrial test and techno-economic analysis of CO2 capture in Huaneng Beijing coal-fired power station," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3347-3354, November.
    2. Hoffmann, Bettina Susanne & Szklo, Alexandre, 2011. "Integrated gasification combined cycle and carbon capture: A risky option to mitigate CO2 emissions of coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3917-3929.
    3. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2012. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for a CCS power generation plant integrated with a sub-bituminous coal mine in Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 32-39.
    4. Viebahn, Peter & Daniel, Vallentin & Samuel, Höller, 2012. "Integrated assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the German power sector and comparison with the deployment of renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 238-248.
    5. Li, Bingyun & Duan, Yuhua & Luebke, David & Morreale, Bryan, 2013. "Advances in CO2 capture technology: A patent review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1439-1447.
    6. Rubin, Edward S. & Chen, Chao & Rao, Anand B., 2007. "Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 4444-4454, September.
    7. Herzog, Howard J., 2011. "Scaling up carbon dioxide capture and storage: From megatons to gigatons," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 597-604, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Weifeng & Xu, Yuanlong & Deng, Zhaoxiong & Wang, Qiuhua, 2022. "Experiments on continuous chemical desorption of CO2-rich solutions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    2. Nimmanterdwong, Prathana & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Piumsomboon, Pornpote, 2017. "Emergy analysis of three alternative carbon dioxide capture processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 101-108.
    3. Hagi, Hayato & Neveux, Thibaut & Le Moullec, Yann, 2015. "Efficiency evaluation procedure of coal-fired power plants with CO2 capture, cogeneration and hybridization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-323.
    4. Yu, Cheng-Hsiu & Chen, Ming-Tsz & Chen, Hao & Tan, Chung-Sung, 2016. "Effects of process configurations for combination of rotating packed bed and packed bed on CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 269-276.
    5. Tobiesen, Finn Andrew & Haugen, Geir & Hartono, Ardi, 2018. "A systematic procedure for process energy evaluation for post combustion CO2 capture: Case study of two novel strong bicarbonate-forming solvents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 161-173.
    6. Li, Kangkang & Yu, Hai & Qi, Guojie & Feron, Paul & Tade, Moses & Yu, Jingwen & Wang, Shujuan, 2015. "Rate-based modelling of combined SO2 removal and NH3 recycling integrated with an aqueous NH3-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 66-77.
    7. Hanak, Dawid P. & Biliyok, Chechet & Manovic, Vasilije, 2015. "Efficiency improvements for the coal-fired power plant retrofit with CO2 capture plant using chilled ammonia process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 258-272.
    8. Xiao, Min & Liu, Helei & Idem, Raphael & Tontiwachwuthikul, Paitoon & Liang, Zhiwu, 2016. "A study of structure–activity relationships of commercial tertiary amines for post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 219-229.
    9. Zhang, Xiaowen & Zhang, Xin & Liu, Helei & Li, Wensheng & Xiao, Min & Gao, Hongxia & Liang, Zhiwu, 2017. "Reduction of energy requirement of CO2 desorption from a rich CO2-loaded MEA solution by using solid acid catalysts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 673-684.
    10. Manuele Gatti & Emanuele Martelli & Daniele Di Bona & Marco Gabba & Roberto Scaccabarozzi & Maurizio Spinelli & Federico Viganò & Stefano Consonni, 2020. "Preliminary Performance and Cost Evaluation of Four Alternative Technologies for Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture in Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    11. Barzagli, Francesco & Giorgi, Claudia & Mani, Fabrizio & Peruzzini, Maurizio, 2018. "Reversible carbon dioxide capture by aqueous and non-aqueous amine-based absorbents: A comparative analysis carried out by 13C NMR spectroscopy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 208-219.
    12. Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Kotowicz, Janusz, 2015. "An analysis of the investment risk related to the integration of a supercritical coal-fired combined heat and power plant with an absorption installation for CO2 separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 423-435.
    13. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    14. Sharifzadeh, Mahdi & Bumb, Prateek & Shah, Nilay, 2016. "Carbon capture from pulverized coal power plant (PCPP): Solvent performance comparison at an industrial scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 423-435.
    15. Wang, Peng & Guo, Yafei & Zhao, Chuanwen & Yan, Junjie & Lu, Ping, 2017. "Biomass derived wood ash with amine modification for post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 34-44.
    16. Halliday, Cameron & Hatton, T. Alan, 2020. "The potential of molten metal oxide sorbents for carbon capture at high temperature: Conceptual design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Otitoju, Olajide & Oko, Eni & Wang, Meihong, 2021. "Technical and economic performance assessment of post-combustion carbon capture using piperazine for large scale natural gas combined cycle power plants through process simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    18. Ali Saleh Bairq, Zain & Gao, Hongxia & Huang, Yufei & Zhang, Haiyan & Liang, Zhiwu, 2019. "Enhancing CO2 desorption performance in rich MEA solution by addition of SO42−/ZrO2/SiO2 bifunctional catalyst," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Khalilpour, Rajab & Milani, Dia & Qadir, Abdul & Chiesa, Matteo & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "A novel process for direct solvent regeneration via solar thermal energy for carbon capture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 60-75.
    20. Roussanaly, S. & Aasen, A. & Anantharaman, R. & Danielsen, B. & Jakobsen, J. & Heme-De-Lacotte, L. & Neji, G. & Sødal, A. & Wahl, P.E. & Vrana, T.K. & Dreux, R., 2019. "Offshore power generation with carbon capture and storage to decarbonise mainland electricity and offshore oil and gas installations: A techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 478-494.
    21. Zhang, Weidong & Jin, Xianhang & Tu, Weiwei & Ma, Qian & Mao, Menglin & Cui, Chunhua, 2017. "Development of MEA-based CO2 phase change absorbent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 316-323.
    22. Lausselet, Carine & Cherubini, Francesco & Oreggioni, Gabriel David & del Alamo Serrano, Gonzalo & Becidan, Michael & Hu, Xiangping & Rørstad, Per Kr. & Strømman, Anders Hammer, 2017. "Norwegian Waste-to-Energy: Climate change, circular economy and carbon capture and storage," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 50-61.
    23. Li, Kangkang & Leigh, Wardhaugh & Feron, Paul & Yu, Hai & Tade, Moses, 2016. "Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture process: Techno-economic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 648-659.
    24. Oh, Se-Young & Yun, Seokwon & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2018. "Process integration and design for maximizing energy efficiency of a coal-fired power plant integrated with amine-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 311-322.
    25. Martin Haaf & Peter Ohlemüller & Jochen Ströhle & Bernd Epple, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of alternative fuels in second-generation carbon capture and storage processes," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 149-164, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rochedo, Pedro R.R. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2013. "Designing learning curves for carbon capture based on chemical absorption according to the minimum work of separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 383-391.
    2. Tola, Vittorio & Pettinau, Alberto, 2014. "Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1461-1474.
    3. Esmaili, Ehsan & Mostafavi, Ehsan & Mahinpey, Nader, 2016. "Economic assessment of integrated coal gasification combined cycle with sorbent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 341-352.
    4. Lee, Suh-Young & Lee, Jae-Uk & Lee, In-Beum & Han, Jeehoon, 2017. "Design under uncertainty of carbon capture and storage infrastructure considering cost, environmental impact, and preference on risk," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 725-738.
    5. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2013. "Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 160-169.
    6. Plaza, M.G. & González, A.S. & Pis, J.J. & Rubiera, F. & Pevida, C., 2014. "Production of microporous biochars by single-step oxidation: Effect of activation conditions on CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 551-562.
    7. Akbilgic, Oguz & Doluweera, Ganesh & Mahmoudkhani, Maryam & Bergerson, Joule, 2015. "A meta-analysis of carbon capture and storage technology assessments: Understanding the driving factors of variability in cost estimates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 11-18.
    8. Siefert, Nicholas S. & Litster, Shawn, 2013. "Exergy and economic analyses of advanced IGCC–CCS and IGFC–CCS power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 315-328.
    9. Moioli, Stefania & Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2016. "Assessment of MDEA absorption process for sequential H2S removal and CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1452-1470.
    10. Zhang, Minkai & Guo, Yincheng, 2013. "Rate based modeling of absorption and regeneration for CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia solution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 142-152.
    11. Walsh, D.M. & O'Sullivan, K. & Lee, W.T. & Devine, M.T., 2014. "When to invest in carbon capture and storage technology: A mathematical model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 219-225.
    12. Nasvi, M.C.M. & Ranjith, P.G. & Sanjayan, J., 2014. "Effect of different mix compositions on apparent carbon dioxide (CO2) permeability of geopolymer: Suitability as well cement for CO2 sequestration wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 939-948.
    13. Muratori, Matteo & Ledna, Catherine & McJeon, Haewon & Kyle, Page & Patel, Pralit & Kim, Son H. & Wise, Marshall & Kheshgi, Haroon S. & Clarke, Leon E. & Edmonds, Jae, 2017. "Cost of power or power of cost: A U.S. modeling perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 861-874.
    14. Njomza Ibrahimi & Alemayehu Gebremedhin & Alketa Sahiti, 2019. "Achieving a Flexible and Sustainable Energy System: The Case of Kosovo," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Luis Míguez, José & Porteiro, Jacobo & Pérez-Orozco, Raquel & Patiño, David & Rodríguez, Sandra, 2018. "Evolution of CO2 capture technology between 2007 and 2017 through the study of patent activity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1282-1296.
    16. Kobos, Peter H. & Malczynski, Leonard A. & Walker, La Tonya N. & Borns, David J. & Klise, Geoffrey T., 2018. "Timing is everything: A technology transition framework for regulatory and market readiness levels," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 211-225.
    17. Zhang, Shuwei & Bauer, Nico & Luderer, Gunnar & Kriegler, Elmar, 2014. "Role of technologies in energy-related CO2 mitigation in China within a climate-protection world: A scenarios analysis using REMIND," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 445-455.
    18. Udayan Singh & Erica M. Loudermilk & Lisa M. Colosi, 2021. "Accounting for the role of transport and storage infrastructure costs in carbon negative bioenergy deployment," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 144-164, February.
    19. Raugei, Marco & Leccisi, Enrica, 2016. "A comprehensive assessment of the energy performance of the full range of electricity generation technologies deployed in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 46-59.
    20. Zhihua Zhang, 2015. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage Facilities Coupled to Coal-Fired Power Plants," Energy & Environment, , vol. 26(6-7), pages 1069-1080, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:138:y:2015:i:c:p:546-558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.