IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v274y2019i1p291-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing projects with uncertain deadlines

Author

Listed:
  • Bordley, Robert F.
  • Keisler, Jeffrey M.
  • Logan, Tom M.

Abstract

In conventional project management, the project manager is given a deadline and is responsible for making decisions assuming this deadline will not change. But in reality, project deadlines frequently change. Conventional project management addresses unanticipated changes in the project deadline with external change control processes. If this external process changes the deadline, the manager will replace the original deadline with the modified deadline. The manager is still suppose to assume this modified deadline is fixed in making project decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bordley, Robert F. & Keisler, Jeffrey M. & Logan, Tom M., 2019. "Managing projects with uncertain deadlines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 291-302.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:274:y:2019:i:1:p:291-302
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221718308130
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cui, Nanfang & Demeulemeester, Erik & Bie, Li, 2016. "Incorporation of activity sensitivity measures into buffer management to manage project schedule riskAuthor-Name: Hu, Xuejun," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 717-727.
    2. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 289-306, September.
    3. Michael T. Pich & Christoph H. Loch & Arnoud De Meyer, 2002. "On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1008-1023, August.
    4. Jeffrey M. Keisler & Robert F. Bordley, 2015. "Project Management Decisions with Uncertain Targets," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 15-28, March.
    5. Neumann, K. & Zimmermann, J., 1999. "Resource levelling for projects with schedule-dependent time windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 591-605, September.
    6. Donald L. Keefer & William A. Verdini, 1993. "Better Estimation of PERT Activity Time Parameters," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(9), pages 1086-1091, September.
    7. Sculli, D, 1989. "A historical note on PERT times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 195-196.
    8. Hans, E.W. & Herroelen, W. & Leus, R. & Wullink, G., 2007. "A hierarchical approach to multi-project planning under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 563-577, October.
    9. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    10. M. Calhoun, Kevin & Deckro, Richard F. & Moore, James T. & Chrissis, James W. & Van Hove, John C., 2002. "Planning and re-planning in project and production scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 155-170, June.
    11. Stefan Creemers & Bert De Reyck & Roel Leus, 2015. "Project planning with alternative technologies in uncertain environments," Post-Print hal-01563008, HAL.
    12. Creemers, Stefan & De Reyck, Bert & Leus, Roel, 2015. "Project planning with alternative technologies in uncertain environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 465-476.
    13. Chunxiao Ding & Yuanguo Zhu, 2015. "Two empirical uncertain models for project scheduling problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(9), pages 1471-1480, September.
    14. Mario Vanhoucke, 2013. "Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling," Springer Books, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-642-40438-2, January.
    15. Elmaghraby, Salah E., 2005. "On the fallacy of averages in project risk management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 307-313, September.
    16. Golenko-Ginzburg, D, 1989. "PERT assumptions revisited," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 393-396.
    17. Erio Castagnoli & Marco LiCalzi, 2005. "Expected utility without utility," Game Theory and Information 0508004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Zafra-Cabeza, Ascensión & Ridao, Miguel A. & Camacho, Eduardo F., 2008. "Using a risk-based approach to project scheduling: A case illustration from semiconductor manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 708-723, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    2. Andrea C. Hupman, 2022. "Cutoff Threshold Decisions for Classification Algorithms with Risk Aversion," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 63-78, March.
    3. Kazuaki Okubo & Makoto Okumura, 2022. "Understanding Project Performance with Stochastic Interruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Drăgan, George Bogdan & Vasilache, Raluca Oana & Schin, George Cristian, 2020. "Exploring eco-label industry actors’ perceptions on the capabilities of a forthcoming multiple project management software – An fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 281-288.
    5. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    2. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    4. Kaut, Michal & Vaagen, Hajnalka & Wallace, Stein W., 2021. "The combined impact of stochastic and correlated activity durations and design uncertainty on project plans," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Kamburowski, J., 1997. "New validations of PERT times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 323-328, June.
    6. Verónica Morales-Sánchez & Antonio Hernández-Mendo & Pedro Sánchez-Algarra & Ángel Blanco-Villaseñor & María-Teresa Anguera-Argilaga, 2009. "Random PERT: application to physical activity/sports programs," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 225-236, March.
    7. Wiesemann, Wolfram & Kuhn, Daniel & Rustem, Berç, 2010. "Maximizing the net present value of a project under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 356-367, April.
    8. Servranckx, Tom & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "A tabu search procedure for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with alternative subgraphs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 841-860.
    9. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    10. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Ilkyeong Moon & Sanghyup Lee & Moonsoo Shin & Kwangyeol Ryu, 2016. "Evolutionary resource assignment for workload-based production scheduling," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 375-388, April.
    12. Junguang Zhang & Dan Wan, 2021. "Determination of early warning time window for bottleneck resource buffer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 289-305, May.
    13. Tao, Liangyan & Wu, Desheng & Liu, Sifeng & Lambert, James H., 2017. "Schedule risk analysis for new-product development: The GERT method extended by a characteristic function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 464-473.
    14. Indranil R. Bardhan & Vish V. Krishnan & Shu Lin, 2007. "Project Performance and the Enabling Role of Information Technology: An Exploratory Study on the Role of Alignment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 579-595, May.
    15. Liu Shu-Shun & Kuo-Chuan Shih, 2009. "A framework of critical resource chain for project schedule analysis," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9), pages 857-869.
    16. Trietsch, Dan & Mazmanyan, Lilit & Gevorgyan, Lilit & Baker, Kenneth R., 2012. "Modeling activity times by the Parkinson distribution with a lognormal core: Theory and validation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 386-396.
    17. Roland Braune & Karl F. Doerner, 2017. "Real-world flexible resource profile scheduling with multiple criteria: learning scalarization functions for MIP and heuristic approaches," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(8), pages 952-972, August.
    18. Siqian Shen & J. Cole Smith & Shabbir Ahmed, 2010. "Expectation and Chance-Constrained Models and Algorithms for Insuring Critical Paths," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(10), pages 1794-1814, October.
    19. Zaraket, Fadi A. & Olleik, Majd & Yassine, Ali A., 2014. "Skill-based framework for optimal software project selection and resource allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 308-318.
    20. Gutjahr, Walter J., 2015. "Bi-Objective Multi-Mode Project Scheduling Under Risk Aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 421-434.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:274:y:2019:i:1:p:291-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.