IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v115y2020icp281-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring eco-label industry actors’ perceptions on the capabilities of a forthcoming multiple project management software – An fsQCA approach

Author

Listed:
  • Drăgan, George Bogdan
  • Vasilache, Raluca Oana
  • Schin, George Cristian

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to introduce fuzzy-sets Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) as the appropriate method in order to explore the causal configurations of capabilities related to future Multiple Project Management software, which is expected to be used by eco-label industry project managers as a testing tool in their forthcoming work. Results show that eight different configurations of MPM software capabilities affect the outcome, encouraging the eco-label industry actors’ interest of testing and using its features. We have also identified a necessary condition for the intention of testing and using the multiple project management software, represented by a combination of high capability in the provision of a shared resource pool to all project managers, high ability of leveling over-allocated resources identified within projects, and low capability of performing comparisons of target and real values for the assessment criteria of performance, costs and time, added to high capability of monitoring activities’ progress according to milestone deadlines.

Suggested Citation

  • Drăgan, George Bogdan & Vasilache, Raluca Oana & Schin, George Cristian, 2020. "Exploring eco-label industry actors’ perceptions on the capabilities of a forthcoming multiple project management software – An fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 281-288.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:115:y:2020:i:c:p:281-288
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319306447
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ragin, Charles C., 2000. "Fuzzy-Set Social Science," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226702773, October.
    2. Andrej Miklosik, 2015. "Improving project management performance through capability maturity measurement," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 2204288, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    3. Amacher, Gregory S. & Koskela, Erkki & Ollikainen, Markku, 2004. "Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 284-306, March.
    4. Mahmood Kasravi & Amin Mahmoudi & Mohammad Reza Feylizadeh, 2018. "A novel algorithm for solving resource-constrained project scheduling problems: a case study," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 194-215, November.
    5. Pappas, Ilias O. & Kourouthanassis, Panos E. & Giannakos, Michail N. & Chrissikopoulos, Vassilios, 2016. "Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 794-803.
    6. Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "The impact of applying effort to reduce activity variability on the project time and cost performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 442-453.
    7. Banerjee, Abhijit & Solomon, Barry D., 2003. "Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: a meta-evaluation of US programs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 109-123, January.
    8. Ragin, Charles C., 2006. "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 291-310, July.
    9. Woodside, Arch G., 2014. "Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2495-2503.
    10. Hadi Moradi & Shahram Shadrokh, 2019. "A robust scheduling for the multi-mode project scheduling problem with a given deadline under uncertainty of activity duration," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(10), pages 3138-3167, May.
    11. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226702766 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Bordley, Robert F. & Keisler, Jeffrey M. & Logan, Tom M., 2019. "Managing projects with uncertain deadlines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 291-302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Micu, Adrian & Capatina, Alexandru & Cristea, Dragos Sebastian & Munteanu, Dan & Micu, Angela-Eliza & Sarpe, Daniela Ancuta, 2022. "Assessing an on-site customer profiling and hyper-personalization system prototype based on a deep learning approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Boratynska, 2021. "Determinants of Economic Fragility in Central and Eastern European Countries FsQCA Approach," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 827-837.
    2. Ferguson, Graham & Megehee, Carol M. & Woodside, Arch G., 2017. "Culture, religiosity, and economic configural models explaining tipping-behavior prevalence across nations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 218-233.
    3. Katarzyna Boratyńska, 2021. "A New Approach for Risk of Corporate Bankruptcy Assessment during the COVID-19 Pandemic," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, December.
    4. López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & Quiñoá-Piñeiro, Lara & López-Pérez, M. Luisa, 2024. "Water and waste management strategies as drivers of the financial performance of food companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Olya, Hossein G.T. & Altinay, Levent, 2016. "Asymmetric modeling of intention to purchase tourism weather insurance and loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2791-2800.
    6. Ferguson, Graham & Megehee, Carol M. & Woodside, Arch G., 2018. "Applying asymmetric, case-based, forecasting modeling in service research: Cultures’ consequences on customers’ service gratuities," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 369-381.
    7. Souiden, Nizar & Amara, Nabil & Chaouali, Walid, 2020. "Optimal image mix cues and their impacts on consumers’ purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    8. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Arribas, Ivan, 2015. "Asymmetric modeling of organizational innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2654-2662.
    9. Bigerna, Simona & D'Errico, Maria Chiara & Polinori, Paolo, 2022. "Understanding the green-growth: which pathways cities undertake in their climate programs," MPRA Paper 114156, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Amara, Nabil & Rhaiem, Mehdi & Halilem, Norrin, 2020. "Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 296-306.
    11. Veríssimo, José Manuel Cristóvão, 2018. "Usage intensity of mobile medical apps: A tale of two methods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 442-447.
    12. Oana Daniela Lupoae & Riana Iren Radu & Mihaela-Carmen Muntean, 2022. "Capturing Entrepreneurial Opportunities in the Romanian Equine Sector: an Fs-Qca Approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 455-472, March.
    13. Xie, Xuemei & Fang, Liangxiu & Zeng, Saixing, 2016. "Collaborative innovation network and knowledge transfer performance: A fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5210-5215.
    14. Xue, Jinjie & Yuan, Hongping & Shi, Benshan, 2016. "Investigating partners' opportunistic behavior in joint ventures in China: The role of transaction costs and relational exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6067-6078.
    15. Bacon, Emily & Williams, Michael D. & Davies, Gareth, 2020. "Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 307-316.
    16. Alexander Leischnig & Arch G. Woodside, 2019. "Who Approves Fraudulence? Configurational Causes of Consumers’ Unethical Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 713-726, September.
    17. Foroudi, Pantea & Jin, Zhongqi & Gupta, Suraksha & Melewar, T.C. & Foroudi, Mohammad Mahdi, 2016. "Influence of innovation capability and customer experience on reputation and loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4882-4889.
    18. Boratyńska, Katarzyna & Grzegorzewska, Emilia, 2018. "Bankruptcy prediction in the agribusiness sector: Lessons from quantitative and qualitative approaches," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 175-181.
    19. Raïes, Karine & Mühlbacher, Hans & Gavard-Perret, Marie-Laure, 2015. "Consumption community commitment: Newbies' and longstanding members' brand engagement and loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2634-2644.
    20. Ren, Shengce & Tsai, Huei-Ting & Eisingerich, Andreas B., 2016. "Case-based asymmetric modeling of firms with high versus low outcomes in implementing changes in direction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 500-507.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:115:y:2020:i:c:p:281-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.