IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v266y2018i1p16-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost allocation in rescheduling with machine unavailable period

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Zhixin
  • Lu, Liang
  • Qi, Xiangtong

Abstract

We study a rescheduling problem faced by multiple job owners sharing a single machine, where jobs need to be rescheduled when the machine becomes unavailable for a period of time. The disruption caused by any new schedule is restricted such that the difference between the completion times in the initial and the new schedules of any job is no more than a given threshold. A natural way to reschedule is to process the jobs in the initial sequence, each as early as possible. This defines a feasible schedule over which cost saving can potentially be achieved by optimal rescheduling as long as the cost saving can be fairly shared by job owners. We define a cooperative game for job owners accordingly, to share the cost saving. Given that the optimization problem is computationally intractable, we find several optimal properties and develop an optimal pseudopolynomial time dynamic programming algorithm for rescheduling. We provide a simple closed form core allocation of the total cost saving for all the jobs, and also provide the Shapley value of the game in a computable form. Then we computationally evaluate the extra cost caused by machine unavailability, the cost saving from optimization relative to the naturally constructed schedule, the likelihood for the Shapley value to be a core allocation, and how the Shapley value allocates cost saving among job owners. Managerial insights are derived from the computational studies. This work contributes to the literature by explicitly incorporating two classic scheduling topics: sequencing game and rescheduling.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Zhixin & Lu, Liang & Qi, Xiangtong, 2018. "Cost allocation in rescheduling with machine unavailable period," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 16-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:266:y:2018:i:1:p:16-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717308056
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borm, Peter & Fiestras-Janeiro, Gloria & Hamers, Herbert & Sanchez, Estela & Voorneveld, Mark, 2002. "On the convexity of games corresponding to sequencing situations with due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(3), pages 616-634, February.
    2. Curiel, I. & Potters, J.A.M. & Rajendra Prasad, V. & Tijs, S.H. & Veltman, B., 1994. "Sequencing and cooperation," Other publications TiSEM be67f9e9-7a4a-47f1-9fb9-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Yuan, Jinjiang & Mu, Yundong, 2007. "Rescheduling with release dates to minimize makespan under a limit on the maximum sequence disruption," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 936-944, October.
    4. Maniquet, Francois, 2003. "A characterization of the Shapley value in queueing problems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 90-103, March.
    5. James C. Bean & John R. Birge & John Mittenthal & Charles E. Noon, 1991. "Matchup Scheduling with Multiple Resources, Release Dates and Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 470-483, June.
    6. Qi, Xiangtong & Bard, Jonathan F. & Yu, Gang, 2006. "Disruption management for machine scheduling: The case of SPT schedules," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 166-184, September.
    7. Jinjiang Yuan & Yundong Mu & Lingfa Lu & Wenhua Li, 2007. "Rescheduling With Release Dates To Minimize Total Sequence Disruption Under A Limit On The Makespan," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(06), pages 789-796.
    8. Steven Thompson & Manuel Nunez & Robert Garfinkel & Matthew D. Dean, 2009. "OR Practice---Efficient Short-Term Allocation and Reallocation of Patients to Floors of a Hospital During Demand Surges," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 261-273, April.
    9. Chen Li & Xiangtong Qi & Chung-Yee Lee, 2015. "Disruption Recovery for a Vessel in Liner Shipping," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 900-921, November.
    10. Imma Curiel & Jos Potters & Rajendra Prasad & Stef Tijs & Bart Veltman, 1994. "Sequencing and Cooperation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 566-568, June.
    11. Gang Yu & Michael Argüello & Gao Song & Sandra M. McCowan & Anna White, 2003. "A New Era for Crew Recovery at Continental Airlines," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 5-22, February.
    12. Ali Tamer Unal & Reha Uzsoy & Ali Kiran, 1997. "Rescheduling on a single machine with part-type dependent setup times and deadlines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 70(0), pages 93-113, April.
    13. Gang Yu & Xiangtong Qi, 2004. "Disruption Management:Framework, Models and Applications," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 5632, August.
    14. Xiaoqiang Cai & George L. Vairaktarakis, 2012. "Coordination of Outsourced Operations at a Third-Party Facility Subject to Booking, Overtime, and Tardiness Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1436-1450, December.
    15. Nicholas G. Hall & Chris N. Potts, 2004. "Rescheduling for New Orders," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 440-453, June.
    16. Nicholas G. Hall & Marc E. Posner, 2001. "Generating Experimental Data for Computational Testing with Machine Scheduling Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 854-865, December.
    17. Kacem, Imed & Chu, Chengbin, 2008. "Worst-case analysis of the WSPT and MWSPT rules for single machine scheduling with one planned setup period," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1080-1089, June.
    18. Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu, 2010. "Capacity Allocation and Scheduling in Supply Chains," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1711-1725, December.
    19. Tolga Aydinliyim & George L. Vairaktarakis, 2010. "Coordination of Outsourced Operations to Minimize Weighted Flow Time and Capacity Booking Costs," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 236-255, January.
    20. U. Manoj & Jatinder Gupta & Sushil Gupta & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2008. "Supply chain scheduling: Just-in-time environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 53-86, July.
    21. Nicholas G. Hall & Chris N. Potts, 2010. "Rescheduling for Job Unavailability," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 746-755, June.
    22. Nicholas G. Hall & Chris N. Potts, 2003. "Supply chain scheduling: Batching and delivery," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 566-584, August.
    23. Tolga Aydinliyim & George L. Vairaktarakis, 2011. "Sequencing Strategies and Coordination Issues in Outsourcing and Subcontracting Operations," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Karl G. Kempf & Pınar Keskinocak & Reha Uzsoy (ed.), Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise, chapter 0, pages 269-319, Springer.
    24. Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu & Chris N. Potts, 2007. "Rescheduling for Multiple New Orders," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 633-645, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Yu-Fang Wang, 2020. "Adaptive job shop scheduling strategy based on weighted Q-learning algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 417-432, February.
    3. Schouten, Jop, 2022. "Cooperation, allocation and strategy in interactive decision-making," Other publications TiSEM d5d41448-8033-4f6b-8ec0-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Schouten, Jop & Saavedra-Nieves, Alejandro & Fiestras-Janeiro, G., 2020. "Sequencing Situations and Games with Non-Linear Cost Functions," Discussion Paper 2020-006, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. Jun-Qiang Wang & Guo-Qiang Fan & Zhixin Liu, 2020. "Mixed batch scheduling on identical machines," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 487-496, August.
    6. Schouten, Jop & Saavedra-Nieves, Alejandro & Fiestras-Janeiro, G., 2020. "Sequencing Situations and Games with Non-Linear Cost Functions," Other publications TiSEM 3e1db5c9-0f77-4f91-a075-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Chen, Jian & Huang, George Q. & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Yang, Chen, 2019. "A cooperative approach to service booking and scheduling in cloud manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 861-873.
    8. Schouten, Jop & Saavedra-Nieves, Alejandro & Fiestras-Janeiro, M. Gloria, 2021. "Sequencing situations and games with non-linear cost functions under optimal order consistency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 734-745.
    9. Luo, Chunlin & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Lev, Benjamin, 2022. "Core, shapley value, nucleolus and nash bargaining solution: A Survey of recent developments and applications in operations management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Jaykrishnan, G. & Levin, Asaf, 2024. "Scheduling with cardinality dependent unavailability periods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 443-458.
    11. Wenchang Luo & Rylan Chin & Alexander Cai & Guohui Lin & Bing Su & An Zhang, 2022. "A tardiness-augmented approximation scheme for rejection-allowed multiprocessor rescheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 690-722, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, Yunqiang & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Du-Juan, 2016. "Rescheduling on identical parallel machines with machine disruptions to minimize total completion time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 737-749.
    2. Wenchang Luo & Rylan Chin & Alexander Cai & Guohui Lin & Bing Su & An Zhang, 2022. "A tardiness-augmented approximation scheme for rejection-allowed multiprocessor rescheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 690-722, August.
    3. Wang, Dujuan & Yin, Yunqiang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Parallel-machine rescheduling with job unavailability and rejection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 246-260.
    4. Nicholas G. Hall & Chris N. Potts, 2010. "Rescheduling for Job Unavailability," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 746-755, June.
    5. Wenchang Luo & Taibo Luo & Randy Goebel & Guohui Lin, 2018. "Rescheduling due to machine disruption to minimize the total weighted completion time," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 565-578, October.
    6. Chen, Jian & Huang, George Q. & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Yang, Chen, 2019. "A cooperative approach to service booking and scheduling in cloud manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 861-873.
    7. Gerichhausen, Marloes & Hamers, Herbert, 2009. "Partitioning sequencing situations and games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 207-216, July.
    8. Qiulan Zhao & Jinjiang Yuan, 2017. "Rescheduling to Minimize the Maximum Lateness Under the Sequence Disruptions of Original Jobs," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(05), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Herbert Hamers & Flip Klijn & Marco Slikker, 2013. "Price of Anarchy in Sequencing Situations and the Impossibility to Coordinate," Working Papers 709, Barcelona School of Economics.
    10. Qiulan Zhao & Lingfa Lu & Jinjiang Yuan, 2016. "Rescheduling with new orders and general maximum allowable time disruptions," 4OR, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 261-280, September.
    11. Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu & Chris N. Potts, 2007. "Rescheduling for Multiple New Orders," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 633-645, November.
    12. Gerichhausen, M. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2007. "Partitioning Sequencing Situations and Games," Other publications TiSEM 2bddbf5c-c56d-4b10-ba47-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Gerichhausen, M. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2007. "Partitioning Sequencing Situations and Games," Discussion Paper 2007-40, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    14. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2014. "A common framework and taxonomy for multicriteria scheduling problems with interfering and competing jobs: Multi-agent scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 1-16.
    15. Agnetis, Alessandro & Aloulou, Mohamed Ali & Fu, Liang-Liang, 2014. "Coordination of production and interstage batch delivery with outsourced distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 130-142.
    16. Xingong Zhang & Win-Chin Lin & Chin-Chia Wu, 2022. "Rescheduling problems with allowing for the unexpected new jobs arrival," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 630-645, April.
    17. Hoogeveen, H. & Lenté, C. & T’kindt, V., 2012. "Rescheduling for new orders on a single machine with setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 40-46.
    18. Li, Chung-Lun & Li, Feng, 2020. "Rescheduling production and outbound deliveries when transportation service is disrupted," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 138-148.
    19. M Ozlen & M Azizoğlu, 2011. "Rescheduling unrelated parallel machines with total flow time and total disruption cost criteria," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(1), pages 152-164, January.
    20. Agnetis, Alessandro & Aloulou, Mohamed Ali & Fu, Liang-Liang, 2016. "Production and interplant batch delivery scheduling: Dominance and cooperation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 38-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:266:y:2018:i:1:p:16-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.