IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v44y2022i1d10.1007_s10878-022-00857-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tardiness-augmented approximation scheme for rejection-allowed multiprocessor rescheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Wenchang Luo

    (Ningbo University)

  • Rylan Chin

    (University of Alberta)

  • Alexander Cai

    (University of Alberta)

  • Guohui Lin

    (University of Alberta)

  • Bing Su

    (Xi’an Technological University)

  • An Zhang

    (Hangzhou Dianzi University)

Abstract

In the multiprocessor scheduling problem to minimize the total job completion time, an optimal schedule can be obtained by the shortest processing time rule and the completion time of each job in the schedule can be used as a guarantee for scheduling revenue. However, in practice, some jobs will not arrive at the beginning of the schedule but are delayed and their delayed arrival times are given to the decision-maker for possible rescheduling. The decision-maker can choose to reject some jobs in order to minimize the total operational cost that includes three cost components: the total rejection cost of the rejected jobs, the total completion time of the accepted jobs, and the penalty on the maximum tardiness for the accepted jobs, for which their completion times in the planned schedule are their virtual due dates. This novel rescheduling problem generalizes several classic NP-hard scheduling problems. We first design a pseudo-polynomial time dynamic programming exact algorithm and then, when the tardiness can be unbounded, we develop it into a fully polynomial time approximation scheme. The dynamic programming exact algorithm has a space complexity too high for truthful implementation; we propose an alternative to integrate the enumeration and the dynamic programming recurrences, followed by a depth-first-search walk in the reschedule space. We implemented the alternative exact algorithm in C and conducted numerical experiments to demonstrate its promising performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenchang Luo & Rylan Chin & Alexander Cai & Guohui Lin & Bing Su & An Zhang, 2022. "A tardiness-augmented approximation scheme for rejection-allowed multiprocessor rescheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 690-722, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:44:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-022-00857-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-022-00857-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-022-00857-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-022-00857-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James C. Bean & John R. Birge & John Mittenthal & Charles E. Noon, 1991. "Matchup Scheduling with Multiple Resources, Release Dates and Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 470-483, June.
    2. Dahal, Keshav & Al-Arfaj, Khalid & Paudyal, Krishna, 2015. "Modelling generator maintenance scheduling costs in deregulated power markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 551-561.
    3. Bernardetta Addis & Giuliana Carello & Andrea Grosso & Elena Tànfani, 2016. "Operating room scheduling and rescheduling: a rolling horizon approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 206-232, June.
    4. Wang, Dujuan & Yin, Yunqiang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Parallel-machine rescheduling with job unavailability and rejection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 246-260.
    5. Ali Tamer Unal & Reha Uzsoy & Ali Kiran, 1997. "Rescheduling on a single machine with part-type dependent setup times and deadlines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 70(0), pages 93-113, April.
    6. Wenchang Luo & Taibo Luo & Randy Goebel & Guohui Lin, 2018. "Rescheduling due to machine disruption to minimize the total weighted completion time," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 565-578, October.
    7. Yin, Yunqiang & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Du-Juan, 2016. "Rescheduling on identical parallel machines with machine disruptions to minimize total completion time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 737-749.
    8. Nicholas G. Hall & Chris N. Potts, 2010. "Rescheduling for Job Unavailability," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 746-755, June.
    9. Qiulan Zhao & Lingfa Lu & Jinjiang Yuan, 2016. "Rescheduling with new orders and general maximum allowable time disruptions," 4OR, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 261-280, September.
    10. Ou, Jinwen & Zhong, Xueling, 2017. "Bicriteria order acceptance and scheduling with consideration of fill rate," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 904-907.
    11. Jinwen Ou & Xueling Zhong, 2017. "Order acceptance and scheduling with consideration of service level," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 429-447, January.
    12. Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu & Chris N. Potts, 2007. "Rescheduling for Multiple New Orders," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 633-645, November.
    13. Liu, Zhixin & Lu, Liang & Qi, Xiangtong, 2018. "Cost allocation in rescheduling with machine unavailable period," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 16-28.
    14. Shabtay, Dvir, 2014. "The single machine serial batch scheduling problem with rejection to minimize total completion time and total rejection cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 64-74.
    15. J N D Gupta & A J Ruiz-torres & S Webster, 2003. "Minimizing maximum tardiness and number of tardy jobs on parallel machines subject to minimum flow-time," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(12), pages 1263-1274, December.
    16. Gang Yu & Michael Argüello & Gao Song & Sandra M. McCowan & Anna White, 2003. "A New Era for Crew Recovery at Continental Airlines," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 5-22, February.
    17. Nicholas G. Hall & Chris N. Potts, 2004. "Rescheduling for New Orders," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 440-453, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Dujuan & Yin, Yunqiang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Parallel-machine rescheduling with job unavailability and rejection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 246-260.
    2. Chen, Rubing & Cheng, T.C.E. & Ng, C.T. & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Wei, Hongjun & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2024. "Rescheduling to trade off between global disruption of original jobs with flexibility and scheduling cost of new jobs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Yin, Yunqiang & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Du-Juan, 2016. "Rescheduling on identical parallel machines with machine disruptions to minimize total completion time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 737-749.
    4. Liu, Zhixin & Lu, Liang & Qi, Xiangtong, 2018. "Cost allocation in rescheduling with machine unavailable period," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 16-28.
    5. Nicholas G. Hall & Chris N. Potts, 2010. "Rescheduling for Job Unavailability," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 746-755, June.
    6. Xingong Zhang & Win-Chin Lin & Chin-Chia Wu, 2022. "Rescheduling problems with allowing for the unexpected new jobs arrival," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 630-645, April.
    7. Li, Chung-Lun & Li, Feng, 2020. "Rescheduling production and outbound deliveries when transportation service is disrupted," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 138-148.
    8. Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu & Chris N. Potts, 2007. "Rescheduling for Multiple New Orders," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 633-645, November.
    9. Wenchang Luo & Taibo Luo & Randy Goebel & Guohui Lin, 2018. "Rescheduling due to machine disruption to minimize the total weighted completion time," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 565-578, October.
    10. Hoogeveen, H. & Lenté, C. & T’kindt, V., 2012. "Rescheduling for new orders on a single machine with setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 40-46.
    11. Qiulan Zhao & Jinjiang Yuan, 2017. "Rescheduling to Minimize the Maximum Lateness Under the Sequence Disruptions of Original Jobs," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(05), pages 1-12, October.
    12. Xiaofei Liu & Weidong Li & Yaoyu Zhu, 2021. "Single Machine Vector Scheduling with General Penalties," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-16, August.
    13. M Ozlen & M Azizoğlu, 2011. "Rescheduling unrelated parallel machines with total flow time and total disruption cost criteria," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(1), pages 152-164, January.
    14. Ulrich Pferschy & Julia Resch & Giovanni Righini, 2023. "Algorithms for rescheduling jobs with a LIFO buffer to minimize the weighted number of late jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 267-287, June.
    15. Jinwen Ou, 2020. "Near-linear-time approximation algorithms for scheduling a batch-processing machine with setups and job rejection," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 525-538, October.
    16. Qiulan Zhao & Lingfa Lu & Jinjiang Yuan, 2016. "Rescheduling with new orders and general maximum allowable time disruptions," 4OR, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 261-280, September.
    17. Mohamadreza Dabiri & Mehdi Yazdani & Bahman Naderi & Hassan Haleh, 2022. "Modeling and solution methods for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with job rejection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2721-2765, July.
    18. Qi, Xiangtong & Bard, Jonathan F. & Yu, Gang, 2006. "Disruption management for machine scheduling: The case of SPT schedules," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 166-184, September.
    19. Yin, Yunqiang & Wang, Yan & Cheng, T.C.E. & Liu, Wenqi & Li, Jinhai, 2017. "Parallel-machine scheduling of deteriorating jobs with potential machine disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 17-28.
    20. Jun-Qiang Wang & Guo-Qiang Fan & Zhixin Liu, 2020. "Mixed batch scheduling on identical machines," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 487-496, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:44:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-022-00857-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.