IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v263y2017i3p782-788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the approximation ratio of the Random Chinese Postman Tour for network search

Author

Listed:
  • Lidbetter, Thomas

Abstract

We consider a classic search problem first proposed by Gal in which a Searcher randomizes between unit speed paths on a network, aiming to find a hidden point in minimal expected time in the worst case. This can be viewed as a zero-sum game between the Searcher and a time maximizing Hider. It is a natural model for many search problems such as search and rescue operations; the search for an enemy, a bomb or weapons in a military context; or predator–prey search. A Chinese Postman Tour (CPT) is a minimal time tour of the network that searches all the arcs and a Random Chinese Postman Tour (RCPT) is an equiprobable choice of any given CPT and its reverse. The full class of networks for which a RCPT is optimal is known, but otherwise little is known about the solution of the game except in some special cases that have complicated optimal strategies that would be impractical to implement. The question of how well a RCPT or any other search strategy performs for general networks has never been analyzed. We show that a RCPT has an approximation ratio of 4/3: that is, the maximum expected time it takes to find a point on the network is no greater than 4/3 times that of the optimal search strategy. We then examine the performance of a RCPT in a related search game recently proposed by Alpern in which the Searcher must return to his starting point after finding the Hider.

Suggested Citation

  • Lidbetter, Thomas, 2017. "On the approximation ratio of the Random Chinese Postman Tour for network search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 782-788.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:263:y:2017:i:3:p:782-788
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717305222
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Alpern & Thomas Lidbetter, 2013. "Mining Coal or Finding Terrorists: The Expanding Search Paradigm," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 265-279, April.
    2. Alpern, Steven & Morton, Alec & Papadaki, Katerina, 2011. "Patrolling games," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 32210, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Steve Alpern, 2011. "A New Approach to Gal’s Theory of Search Games on Weakly Eulerian Networks," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 209-219, June.
    4. Steve Alpern & Thomas Lidbetter, 2015. "Optimal Trade-Off Between Speed and Acuity When Searching for a Small Object," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 122-133, February.
    5. Alpern, Steven & Lidbetter, Thomas, 2015. "Optimal trade-off between speed and acuity when searching for a small object," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61504, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Steve Alpern, 2011. "Find-and-Fetch Search on a Tree," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1258-1268, October.
    7. Steve Alpern & Vic Baston & Shmuel Gal, 2008. "Network search games with immobile hider, without a designated searcher starting point," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 37(2), pages 281-302, June.
    8. Steve Alpern & Alec Morton & Katerina Papadaki, 2011. "Patrolling Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1246-1257, October.
    9. Vic Baston & Kensaku Kikuta, 2015. "Search games on a network with travelling and search costs," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(2), pages 347-365, May.
    10. Shmuel Gal, 2001. "On the optimality of a simple strategy for searching graphs," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 29(4), pages 533-542.
    11. Reijnierse, J H & Potters, J A M, 1993. "Search Games with Immobile Hider," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 21(4), pages 385-394.
    12. Zoroa, N. & Fernández-Sáez, M.J. & Zoroa, P., 2012. "Patrolling a perimeter," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 571-582.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baston, Vic & Kikuta, Kensaku, 2019. "A search problem on a bipartite network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 227-237.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steve Alpern & Thomas Lidbetter, 2019. "Approximate solutions for expanding search games on general networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 259-279, April.
    2. Garrec, Tristan & Scarsini, Marco, 2020. "Search for an immobile hider on a stochastic network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 783-794.
    3. Yolmeh, Abdolmajid & Baykal-Gürsoy, Melike, 2021. "Weighted network search games with multiple hidden objects and multiple search teams," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 338-349.
    4. Lidbetter, Thomas, 2020. "Search and rescue in the face of uncertain threats," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1153-1160.
    5. Steve Alpern, 2017. "Hide-and-Seek Games on a Network, Using Combinatorial Search Paths," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1207-1214, October.
    6. Baston, Vic & Kikuta, Kensaku, 2019. "A search problem on a bipartite network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 227-237.
    7. Oléron Evans, Thomas P. & Bishop, Steven R., 2013. "Static search games played over graphs and general metric spaces," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 667-689.
    8. Steve Alpern & Thomas Lidbetter, 2014. "Searching a Variable Speed Network," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 697-711, August.
    9. Steve Alpern & Thomas Lidbetter, 2015. "Optimal Trade-Off Between Speed and Acuity When Searching for a Small Object," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 122-133, February.
    10. Alpern, Steve & Fokkink, Robbert & Simanjuntak, Martin, 2016. "Optimal search and ambush for a hider who can escape the search region," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 707-714.
    11. Lisa Hellerstein & Thomas Lidbetter & Daniel Pirutinsky, 2019. "Solving Zero-Sum Games Using Best-Response Oracles with Applications to Search Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 731-743, May.
    12. Laan, Corine M. & van der Mijden, Tom & Barros, Ana Isabel & Boucherie, Richard J. & Monsuur, Herman, 2017. "An interdiction game on a queueing network with multiple intruders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1069-1080.
    13. Vic Baston & Kensaku Kikuta, 2015. "Search games on a network with travelling and search costs," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(2), pages 347-365, May.
    14. Steve Alpern, 2011. "Find-and-Fetch Search on a Tree," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1258-1268, October.
    15. Jotshi, Arun & Batta, Rajan, 2008. "Search for an immobile entity on a network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 347-359, December.
    16. Ríos Insua, David & Cano, Javier & Pellot, Michael & Ortega, Ricardo, 2016. "Multithreat multisite protection: A security case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 888-899.
    17. Jake Clarkson & Kevin D. Glazebrook & Kyle Y. Lin, 2020. "Fast or Slow: Search in Discrete Locations with Two Search Modes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 552-571, March.
    18. Alpern, Steve & Lidbetter, Thomas, 2020. "Search and Delivery Man Problems: When are depth-first paths optimal?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 965-976.
    19. Bui, Thuy & Lidbetter, Thomas, 2023. "Optimal patrolling strategies for trees and complete networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 769-776.
    20. Garrec, Tristan, 2019. "Continuous patrolling and hiding games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 42-51.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:263:y:2017:i:3:p:782-788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.